• variants@possumpat.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I was just reading up on bluesky yesterday and you can self host and also have a bridge to link with the fediverse so maybe there is some hope to communicate

  • Foni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yesterday I read on mastodon that leaving Twitter to go to Bluesky is like quitting smoking to start vaping. Changing a centralized place that lives off your data for another one. Right now Bluesky does not have hate speech like Twitter just because it does not suit the current accounts of its shareholders

    • Iapar@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      How is mastodon not just a bunch of centralized platforms?

      Sure the servers communicate with each other but the content is still just on one of them. Goes the server, so goes the content.

      Or am I mistaking?

      If it is like I say I feel it is more trading Hitler in for, potentially, a bunch of smaller Hitlers.

      • Lanthanae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        a bunch of centralized platforms?

        This is what decentralized means. If your home instance goes to shit, you can just move your account to another one.

    • NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The fediverse is considered ‘over’ when parasitic leeches like Musk and Spez come knocking on Lemmy’s and BlueSky’s doors like “we want growth…please sell to us”.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Hardly. The Fediverse spans multiple apps and services, and it existed before Elon bought Twitter and it will continue existing regardless of what the billionaires do, because it’s not run by just one person.

      The whole point is decentralization, not growth, so unless the billionaires can take out every server hosting an instance, the Fediverse isn’t going anywhere.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        This.

        Back in the day this is how the internet worked. Every forum host was just some guy or girl hosting a platform so they coukd build a community with the people and hobbies they love.

        We need to go back closer to that world. The fediverse bridges the gap between the centralized experience, and decentralized management.

        Optimistically, it’s the best of both worlds.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I know I can’t ever go back. I donate to my instance, and I actually feel good about it, because I know it’s not going into the pocket of some faceless corporation who’s beholden to its shareholders instead of its customers.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I don’t think it’s the worst outcome or the Fediverse needing to be written off because of this. At least for now BridgyFed is a thing, and it’s not like we have to capture every refugee, Mastodon has thriving and tight-knit communities.