Modern cars have MASSIVE digital displays, loads of computers systems monitoring every subsystem and internal diagnostics running to the OBDII ports.

Why the hell can’t we get diagnostic feeds on our console or infotainment center?

I’m not aware of any car manufacturers selling their own diagnostic ASICs, so it’s not an extra margin to squeeze afaik…

What gives? Any insight into this beyond the usual muh corporate profits conjecture?

  • LemoineFairclough@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Car manufacturers aren’t required to document how to repair “infotainment centers” because they aren’t critical to the operation of a car. Making them more useful might require a car manufacturer to spend more money by allowing more requirements to be imposed upon them.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    They don’t want to maintain the software for it.

    Also, they simply don’t want you to know. Especially if the whole setup is already a patchwork of sensors that barely work together in the first place. It might cause unnecessary questions, concerns or even liabilities.

    A lot of it is useless anyway as long as the car is not broken, and if it is broken, the sensor might be broken too. It’s meant for diagnostics only.

    • recreationalcatheter@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      They don’t want to maintain the software for it.

      That’s fine, I just want the error codes displayed on the existing screens. No software necessary for that. Maybe a simple script at worst…

      Also, they simply don’t want you to know.

      They want it to be known, otherwise there wouldn’t be fail codes output to the OBDII port…

      It’s meant for diagnostics only.

      Yes. Why don’t they display diagnostics error codes on the existing displays? I’m fine with special display modes and “secret” menu options.

  • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    What I’ve learned with 15 years in the DIY repair sphere is that (obviously to me) the codes don’t tell you what’s at fault, only what’s not reading correctly and (to my surprise) the general public will just replace what the code says is off. A MAF code doesn’t tell you if it’s the sensor, the wiring, or the PCM.

    While I’d certainly appreciate a simple code readout because I’m pretty knowledgeable about which are actually concerning this moment vs this year vs never, diagnosis typically takes more equipment and time. The cost and hassle of the reader is negligible in the repair. I use a Bluetooth dongle and Torque app to read all kinds of stats when diagnosing. An integrated interface would be convenient in some ways, but the portability of a phone/tablet probably has an equal amount of convenience once hard diag is needed

  • radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The same reason they won’t let you buy the dealership scan software for under 10k. Almost every maker has an in house scanner and due to standards they only need to provide certain data to non dealer level tools and I believe the standard only exists for gas powered vehicles that need to provide OBD2 data. Plenty of makers (BMW is horrible about this) stuff away data where a normal obd scanner just won’t access and it’s gotten much worse with the overuse of CANBus (I sure love when my trunk lid sensor prevents my fucking car from starting).

    Thats where your snapon and other third party scanners start bringing a gap, but even those are extremely pricey and need to be updated constantly and even those usually won’t do EVERYTHING.

    Fwiw the cheapest and best way I’ve found is basically to pirate the dealer software and get a compatible knockoff scanner (vxdiag for example). I have Ford IDS and a couple others this way but assume that the software is gonna install something malicious and dedicate an old Thinkpad or something to it.

    Depending on the age of your vehicle something like Torque Pro is extremely useful. I have mine monitoring transmission temp, long and short term fuel trims, O2 sensor signals, voltage, mass air speed, intake temp. It’s more than enough data to see something coming long before it becomes an issue.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    As other mentioned cheap ODB2 readers, but some brands offer a lot of diagnostic data over the infotainment system, they just won’t display them to you - for BMW I use AAIdrive (is foss, github/AAIdrive) and it displays some of the data on the main screen without a physical ODB2 reader inserted.
    (And ofc custom navigation, VLC, etc)

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    We could have had readable diagnostics since they started showing multiple items on the in-dash LCDs. It’s always money.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not aware of any car manufacturers selling their own diagnostic ASICs, so it’s not an extra margin to squeeze afaik…

    What? The errors are intentionally vague so the drivers are forced to go to a dealer, giving them a chance to lie and pretend that’s something very serious and very expensive, while all they’re going to do is a reseat of a cable and a error reset

    Btw Car scanner supports showing obd data on Android auto. It’s a game changer for hypermilers

    • recreationalcatheter@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I disagree… Error codes from the OBD port are usually system-specific. They make troubleshooting very easy if you use online resources… I just want a quick readout on the included hardware.

      Not a fan of dongles and such. I own a few different ‘Amazon specials’ and the UI feels like hot garbage (given I use them maybe 1-2x a year at most).

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m guessing government regulation.

      This feature is a no-brainer. Whenever there’s a feature the market would love (and hence pay for) the reason it isn’t there is the government doesn’t allow it.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It’s almost always the reverse.

        Regulation is what forced manufacturers to provide standard error codes over a standard protocol using a standard socket, so that people could self diagnose their car problems without getting locked into their dealership mechanic

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The sad answer is that those displays exist to cut costs, not to make your ownership experience better.

    Also the dealers want you to come to them for that CEL, and the companies don’t want to piss off the dealers.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why don’t the companies want to piss off the dealers? Is some Toyota dealership really gonna stop selling Toyotas because a Toyota comes out with a self-diagnosis feature?

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some cars do! Mine shows diagnostic info for the can bus and GPS by holding down a “secret” button combination. I’m sure other manufacturers do that too.

    • recreationalcatheter@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can’t even get my manufacturer to give me a fuse box diagram… what make do you drive if you don’t mind me being nosy?

      • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        2004 Honda Accord Coupe. Yup, screens even back then. (On the fancy models)

        It’s… a trooper. First thing I did after I bought the car was purchase the service manuals for $400. It’s so easy to maintain.

        I looked that up for my partners newer car. Annual subscription to a service manuals is $1500+.

        • recreationalcatheter@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Eish, that’s horrible. Knowledge about the tech you paid thousands for should NEVER be a live service.

          I’m about to go back to horse and buggy.