• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      The winner was the guy who could successfully exert power over the judiciary, while the loser was the guy without a committed vanguard ready to storm an election counting office to guarantee victory.

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 days ago

    We were almost done with the Harambe timeline. But some dumbasses in NY had to kidnap and kill an internet famous squirrel named P’Nut…Now we’re an openly fascist country.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    Killing Hitler right now would be a mistake. No nuclear arms race means no nuclear power, no cold war (which was better than a hot war), and far less advancements (kiss computers bye bye!).

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I feel like no Hitler would potentially change so many things that it’d be hard to make a concrete prediction on what the world would look like today.

    • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      You’re being downvoted, yet evidence is outer clear that a great many technology advancements have directly derived from conflict pressures. We’d get the same effect if it weren’t for fucking small-government, low tax shit-for-brains, but we don’t. When vast, collective resources are poured into a field, it generates a lot of waste but also a lot of progress. Progress isn’t impossible without war, but historically we see far more advancement during times of war than during times of peace.

      If we ever cure cancer, it’ll be because we had a war and, during the development of some weapon, the huge concentration of resources resulted in discoveries that someone noticed - as a side effect - happened to cure cancer. It’ll never happen without a war because there’s no private sector motivation to cure cancer: there’s too much money and industry invested in treating cancer.

      You’re essentially right.

    • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Real solution is sending a nuke through time to kill Hitler at the start of the war.

      • Ardyssian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        This is the premise for the Red Alert series in Command and Conquer - Stalin becomes the aggressor when Hitler was wiped