Many EU countries have a “VAT” and like feel like this is kinda targeting poor people. Like, for the rich, this is insignificant, for poorer people, a (example) 20% tax would be a huge burden. Why do they do this?

🤔

  • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because fuck the poor and working class. Don’t forget that they’re double dipping since income is often taken out of your earnings before you even get your money then every single purchase is taxed too.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Don’t forget that they’re double dipping since income is often taken out of your earnings before you even get your money then every single purchase is taxed too.

      😭

      Because fuck the poor and working class.

      I thought EU was very progressive since they often have stuff (like healthcare) much better than the US. Is their “progressiveism” a myth? Am I over-estimating how progressive they are? 🤔

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The EU is one of the most progressive regions on Earth, if not the most. That said they’re definitely nowhere close to perfect, as seen from the encrypted messaging fiasco.

      • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        There’s another factor that nobody mentioned: the sales tax in EU countries is different for different products. This allows countries to incentive or disincentivize different classes of products by ramping the sales tax up or down. Higher tax on junk food, cigarettes and/or alcohol, low or nonexistent sales tax for basic ingredients and medicine.

        Interestingly, France and the Czech republic tax wine and beer respectively like basic food.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Taxing at point of sale is a weird way to do it.

          A better way (in my opinion) is by income, the higher, the higher your tax rate.

          A VAT is essentially like a “flat tax” rate, that some politicians in the US are proposing.

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Depends how you look at it. Out of my wage, I lose ~50% after taxes and the healthcare system’s “fair share” and, depending on the country, the health system is so under-funded anyway that there’s a heavy incentive to give in and pay private if you want certain operations or some such done anytime in the foreseeable future.

    • philluminati@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      In what way does VAT hurt the poor more than the rich? Considering it’s on each item you buy it clearly impacts the rich more than the poor.

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Because VAT is proportional to the item, not the person’s income. From one perspective, yes it’s a fair system but from another, the cost of living is significantly greater for a poor person than a wealthy person. Many are barely scraping by while others are out wining and dining and still getting plenty for free.