• Fleur_@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hi, I have some questions about this. I’m interested in storing movies and tv shows on Blu ray discs. If I burn video formats onto discs how hard is it to get those to play back on various different Blu ray players. I imagine it’s simple when it’s connected to a PC but what about through typical Blu ray players you might plug into your tv or a gaming console like a PS4?

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        As long as they are the right region format for the DVD player they should be fine. Ripped files don’t really have region formats anymore, but you can add the appropriate one in most burners.

        You can also get region agnostic players but that’s probably harder to do now than just making all your media in the right format.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Okay so I’ve just tested it. I took a DVD that was in PAL format and ripped it, when I burn it to another disc It now doesn’t have any region protection at all so I guess the readers just totally remove it, so you probably don’t even need to add a region.

            I only have a PS5 to test it on and it worked okay on the PS5 I don’t know about random crappy DVD players you got from the supermarket they might not work.

            Also that was a DVD not a Blu-ray because I have literally no idea how you would even burn blu-rays, is it even a thing, regardless I don’t think I can do it.

  • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I still burn discs every now and then. Definitely glad to see I don’t have to panic buy stockpiles of them now.

  • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Unfortunately I don’t think Verbatim manufactures any quad-layer discs, so Sony was the only real option for 128GB disks.

    Furthermore, M-Disc is still very pricey per-GB, and their non M-Disc BD disks aren’t priced that much better. I’ve also recently got a spindle of Verbatim BDXLs that every single one would fail to either write or read at the layer transitions, so having a single option here is already proving to be painful.

    • downhomechunk@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Disc failure is the verbatim I remember, but I’m glad they’re still around. My 2008 car has a 6 disc CD changer, and I have a few retro PCs which rely on CDs too. Yes, I know I can get adapters for CF cards and the like, but doing things the old way is the whole point.

  • philpo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    M-Disc/Archive Blue ray discs are currently pretty much unrivaled if one needs WORM(write once read many) storage for important data.

    Anything cloud is an issue in that regards, while a few options exist that somewhat imitate WORM to comply with regulations they are often expensive, harder to maintain and, if long term storage is required, prohibitivly expensive.

    The next option, Tandberg RDX needs a far less popular writer, it’s WORM media is far more expensive, far more sensitive towards exterior influences and it’s much harder to make sure you will be able to read the data in 20 years.

    LTO is nice, the tapes are somewhat cheap but the drives are extremely expensive - far to expensive for smaller businesses or consumers.

    (And please for the love of god, normal exterior HDs,etc. are NOT backup media for long term storage, especially not WORM- which is important in times of ransomware attacks)

    So in the end verbatim would be an absolute idiot to destroy this market. I work with a lot of smaller healthcare facilities and they all exclusively work with them - they routinely burn their data on a M-Disc that is then stored in a secure location, as they all need to provide their patient records for at least 10, mostly for 15, in some cases for 30 or more years. The doctors can literally go to jail if they do not comply with that.(And getting hacked or your building burning down is not an excuse)

    As a CEO of a small company we also need to retain certain tax and accounting data for 10 years, some for 20 years. And even as a individual I have some stuff I legally must retain for 10 years.

    And of course photos of important life events and some documents (insurance, mortgage) are also something I don’t want to loose if the house burns down. Therefore the important stuff gets burned to a M-Disc three times a year and then locked into a bank vault quite a bit away.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      How are external HDs not a backup? Sure if it’s left attached 24/7 it would also get caught by ransomware potentially but otherwise surely that is what external media is good for?

      Most of my data isn’t that important, but have a script that can sync a live copy to several locations over the LAN and create a timestamped compressed folder of it, usually keep a few of the timestamped copies on external media.

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        External HDs are good for short term backup - I do use them for that myself.

        But they are not suitable for long term backup, they are susceptible to damage, sector errors,bit rod and interference.

        If you leave them unpowered for longer times the chances that the mechanical components are gonna fail are actually increased.

        Some of these issues can be reduced,but never fully.

        Additionally there are ransomware viruses that directly attack them - they intentionally encrypt the backups first when the drives are connected before they attack the live data. And in at least one case I know of the attackers bricked the HD firmware.

        Therefore for long term storage of really important things WORM (write once read many) media is to be preferred - even if the attackers can access the disk for some reason they cannot alter the once written data.

    • slinkyjelly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      What do people normally store one write one mediums I feel like I’d have a hard time working with write once items except for like maybe just music storage

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Personally I store all “Very important data” on it - things I really don’t want to loose even if my data storage at home and my cloud storage gets compromised. Among them:

        • Photos of life events. Wedding, photos of the kids, photos of relatives that are now deceased, etc.

        • Important documents. Birth certificates, copies of IDs, passports, insurance documents, degrees and certificates, banking/taxation/accounting documents, bills for the important stuff like major renovations, the expensive IT stuff, etc.*

        • Backup of important files (for me Uni files for my lectures, some work files, backup of the password DBs, plans for the house, a tutorial how to receive files from the cloud storage, decryption keys, etc.)

        (*: This is more a theoretical choice - as I can get 100GB media for the same price as the 50GB I currently simply copy the full paperless file storage. But the script normally only copies these. They are flagged with a custom field in paperless)

        I do not use addition to the storage,so no “these files are new since the last copy” but I simply make a full backup of these files every time (usually three times a year). This reduces the risk of one backup being compromised - very likely I only fall back 4 month which is tolerable. The discs itself are stored in a locked box in a bank vault a bit further away. I have to go there a few times a year anyway,so it’s not hassle. (And they have great coffee). The box costs me 50€ a year and has enough room for 50 years of M Disks and a few extra items.

        Anything taxation related must be stored for 10 years even by private individuals here,so there is that.

        My customers (smaller health care organisations, e.g. your fellow neighbourhood dentist or GP) usually store patient data and accounting data on them. They need to store them long term (up to 30 years) for legal reasons, additionally they don’t want a opposing lawyer to later tell them “you have manipulated the data”. Having multiple copies that cannot be manipulated reduces that claim to “you manipulated before you stored it” and we have other ways to fight that.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Could you store a checksum of the backup with an NFT? Think I just threw up a little bit there, but perhaps there is actually a use case for them them. At least it proves the backup remains since it was created regardless of how many copies you have

  • dan69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I did get a ~128 micro sdxc (micro center branded) for free, so, im kinda on the fence, but wont mind rocking a cd player again!

    • Exec@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      ~128 micro sdxc (micro center branded) for free

      How bad is it, Class 4 perhaps?

      • Tavi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        SDs are cheap these days, 128 class 10 for 9$. Just don’t buy them for OS level writes, logging is ok.

        • dan69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          My goal was to just use it as media storage, smol formats and minimal use cases

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I only have an estimated 96 remaining years on this planet. Why would I care about my data after that?

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        We regularly look at photographs taken at the dawn of photography, and read documents created hundreds or even thousands of years ago.

        There is a use case for this tech.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      If only they weren’t so expensive.

      Edit: OK not terrible for AU dollars. Missed that.

      But still, a 20TB backup would be $4K USD. Too hefty compared to even redundant magnetic storage.

    • burgersc12@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      500gb for $150 is a little bit pricy for me tbh. I don’t think I’d ever need something quite so long lasting and will we even watch or interact with media the same way in like 40 years? Movies and screens may get phased out for holo or something no ones even dreamed of yet.

      • overload@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Not sure where you’re from, but that website link is Australian and $150 AUD is about $94 USD at the moment.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        If the burner is cheap enough, or you can borrow one, backing up family photos in a way that will be viewable in hundreds of years time would be worth it to me.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I would not even be confident that the disc would be readable in 50 years’ time except by certain archivists or hobbyists.

          There are so many hours of music people wrote on Amigas or Atari STs that are just floating around out there on floppy discs that are still readable, but only by a very small number of people, so they will never be heard again, and it’s been only 30 years.

          Another example- right now I have family movies my parents took back in the 60s on Super-8 films. Super-8 isn’t exactly impossible to play, but why would I get a Super-8 projector and a screen just to watch those even though they’re watchable? That would be both cost- and space-prohibitive. Thankfully, I had them digitized a long time ago.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Not without a disk drive that runs scrambled data decoding (BD+) in a VM on top of decryption (AACS), according to the (reverse engineered) DRM spec of bluray.

          https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Blu-ray

          Sorry, but, if nothing else, the DRM makes Bluray and DVD as long-term archive unsuitable.

        • burgersc12@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I have like 3 pictures I actually care about anymore I’d be more than willing to delete the rest. My parents have always taken like at least a dozen pictures every time we “do something” and I always have to ask… Why drop everything you are doing for a picture that you will, in all likelihood, never look at again. I’d much rather just enjoy the moment tbh

          • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            lol I don’t think you’re the target demographic if you can’t imagine any scenario of this having a good purpose to exist. It’s apparently rated by the Department of Defense, definitely has some applications people are interested in. Hell, you could recoup costs on harddrive failures alone over your child’s lifetime, just need a reader. Would be a pretty neat present to give someone as well filled like a photo album with personal media/ favorite games/ music/ whatever you want backed up for your kids. People spend a lot of money on multiple backup options so this is just another ace in your deck along with other safeguards.

            • burgersc12@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              True, I’m no data hoarder. Just seems like it’s a very small niche that this fits into. Never had a hard drive fail on me, but I’ll give it a couple more decades lol

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I have a stack of Verbatim blanks I bought years ago just in case they ever stopped being sold; I’ve actually used quite a few to create daisy disks and audio CDs.