• ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nah, as soon as I saw the ruling actually protects the safety of women seeking assistance with terminating pregnancies, I knew it had nothing to do with the US. But that was very courteous and welcome just the same.

  • tygerprints@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Thank GOD for this. Such anti-humane behavior should be criminalized, anywhere and everywhere in the world. I think the punishment is a little lenient - only six months in prison? I think such dirty filth as would so something like this should be jailed for up to 60 years, minimum. The intention of these sick folks is to make people seeking valid healthcare feel horrible and dirty about themselves. And there’s no way to legitimize such disgusting behavior in any way.

    • kellyaster@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      make people seeking valid healthcare feel horrible

      Exactly, and you’re right, it is inhumane. This isn’t the expression of free speech or religion, it’s fuckin’ harassment. Good on the UK for the ruling, people deserve to get the healthcare they need without being intimidated and deterred by toxic assholes.

      • tygerprints@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I agree and thanks for supporting my view. It’s ridiculous anybody should be harrassed for seeking any kind of medical treatment. And these people think they’re doing “God’s” work? Guess again. Bible thumping to scare people ought to be considered exactly what is is, which is fascist terrorism.

  • Efwis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    There is no evidence whatsoever to show that anyone is being harassed outside abortion clinics.

    Is t it harassment to try to convince someone that they are wrong for doing something they have clearly thought about and decided to do? These women have looked at all angles before making their decision, do these nuts actually think that their alternatives are the only viable answer? Also are these nuts going to pay the costs to raise and clothe these unwanted births?

    The answer to the last two questions are a resounding no, because it’s not their problem.

    Pro-life is now pro-birth and be damned the consequences to anyone else.

    • SharkAttak@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I bet they wouldn’t like it, if someone tried to convince them to renounce their faith outside their churches…

      • Efwis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Most of them are Sunday Christian’s that are only “helping” because they are worried about what their friends from church might think about them. Believe it or not about 60% of Christian’s are Sunday only Christian’s. They would just as soon ignore you then help you.

        • Maeve@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Where I live, churches actively harp on certain biblical sins like lgbtq and women not submitting to men, but blatantly ignore others, like greed and adultery (on the men’s side).

  • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    “Everyone must have the freedom to pray quietly in a public place,” she said.

    “Everyone must have the freedom to give and to receive information. I, and my group of volunteers, would never dream of doing something that causes intimidation and harassment and I find it extremely concerning that unfounded accusations of such reprehensible behaviour have been used for ideological gains to discredit genuine humanitarian endeavours.”

    Oh look, it’s a miracle! Anti-abortion protesters protesting quietly! LOL

    Maybe it’s just me, but I feel pretty certain that “quiet” is her code for getting up in a woman’s personal space, grouping around and physically hounding her from car to clinic door, waving bibles and loudly praying at the lady the whole way in as though they think Jesus himself is standing over them with a baseball bat ready to drop down if they don’t, and then repeating the performance on her way back out.

    Bitch, if you’d been even a FRACTION as quiet as you’d like everyone to believe, no one would have sought a 150-meter exclusion zone around the clinic to begin with, nor would it have been granted under an act that has “Anti-Social Behaviour” in its name. “Humanitarian endeavour,” lol.

    If these freaks were to give as much attention to themselves and their own actions and deeds as they do to the entrance spaces of abortion clinics, it would be a better world. Instead, they settle for performative religion and temper tantrums and every possible shitty behavior toward others they can think of – in the name of Jesus. (Glory.)

  • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    This post is funny because it has a source of the people advocating to violate other people’s protections, but reports the opposite.

  • Maeve@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Good. There people stared into the abyss so long, the abyss started back.