I’m pretty sure no part of this is a good thing
I enjoyed what little of it there was too, but there just wasn’t anything substantial to it. What was there was mechanics FO4 did better 8 years earlier supporting a non existent story and a largely empty world. I was willing to overlook that snapping/building ships/outposts was FO4’s settlement building but somehow worse. I was prepared to accept that individual clothing pieces were no longer a thing in favor of monolithic outfits even though it felt like a step backwards. I was even willing to accept that I couldn’t walk from one side of a settlement to the other without 3 load screens but by the time it got to the “ending” and my own gorram character just chuckles at me for thinking anything whatsoever would be explained it was obvious that I’d been taken for a ride. I liked what was there, or maybe I just really wanted to, but I was much more disappointed by what wasn’t there.
Bethesda’s Starfield was generally a well-regarded RPG,
According to whom? It was a hollow shell of a game with a main storyline that can be summed up as “there is none.”
The entire rest of the world: air travel is a serious ecological issue, and maybe we should reexamine how we use it, especially private flights.
This company: lolol private planes for dogs!
It would hilarious if it weren’t so tragic.
I mean, they might if they just fucking fired Todd Howard. He’s rapidly turning into Peter Molyneux and he needs to just go away.
“This thing they announced for last year, then pushed back to this year and released to coincide with a massively hyped TV show was a complete surprise to us.” Is that really FO:London’s stance? I mean, I feel for them that it sucks, but to call it a surprise feels straight up disingenuous.
Subscription to a cell carrier maybe? I’ve used Android Auto in particular a bunch. It connects to my phone and uses Google maps, which is non subscription. Admittedly it’s been a bit, I suppose Google could have crippled it since I last used it, but I have my doubts. My mother uses it regularly and I guarantee she’d be throwing a fit if she needed to pay to do so.
Car makers don’t give you that option.
Except they do if you have Android Auto. Literally none of that has any bearing whatsoever on subscriptions for cruise control though.
Pics or it didn’t happen
Is this whole issue just “we told an algorithm to do a thing and we’re shocked that it did it?” The ‘prompt’ is basically telling it to do this behaviour, including giving it the new name but the article treats it as if it’s spontaneous.
You’re not but it sure seems like OP is.
Honestly, I’d play as Tina if they did the game right. I could see her having an ability like Moze’s Iron Cub but a rabbit, and more explosive.
Wait, Tiny Tina is a playable character in BL3? I must have missed that part.
Does Harold from Fallout count?
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I’m the better for it.
I’ve just opened Lemmy and this is the first thing I see. I’ve clearly made a mistake.
Thank you and goodnight.
And they’ll say “aww Topsy” at my autopsy!