Laser Beams Deflected Off of Nothing but Air for First Time Ever in Breakthrough Patent Pending Process - The Debrief::An international team of scientists report that they have successfully used acoustics to deflect laser beams in an engineering first.

  • Subverb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    140 decibels. I’m sure some applications exist but it won’t be a 3D TV soon.

    • Slowy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In an ultrasonic frequency we can’t hear. But your pets and any nearby bats or rodents etc may be upset by it…

        • Slowy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          55
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t know the answer to this so I looked it up - yes. Over 120 Db can cause damage even if it’s ultrasonic and you can’t hear it. Apparently at 155Db the heat created by the sound wave can be dangerous as well.

          • Kazumara@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            40
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Just a small note, it’s written dB, small “d”, big “B”.

            “B” is the unit symbol for bel and “d” is the symbol for the SI prefix deci, a tenth.

              • Kazumara@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh yes, sure you can, 140 dB is 0.000014 MB. The confusing thing is just that the non-SI unit byte also uses the symbol “B” and uses the SI prefix “M” quite often.

                Sometimes when I calculate optical power levels I actually use B in between. For example:

                How much signal is 88 optical channels at 1.6 dBm of power each?

                0 dBm = 1 mW by definition

                1.6 dB = 0.16 B = log10 ( x ) --> x = 10 ^ 0.16 = 1.45

                So 1.6 dBm is 1.45 * 1 mW = 1.45 mW

                Then 88 channels is 88 * 1.45 mW = 127.60 mW = 127.60 * 1 mW

                log10(127.60) = 2.11 B = 21.1 dB

                So 127.20 mW is 21.1 dBm, just below the output specification of our amplifier, good, nothing should melt.

        • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes. Industrial grade ultrasonic sensors are harmful to your health. They can be used, for example, to measure the water level in a tank. If you need to enter a place like that, you should physically disconnect the sensor first. You might not hear much of the noise, but you may feel it in your teeth or some other places.

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fun fact, if sound travelled through space, the sun would be as loud as a jackhammer everywhere on earth. Second fun fact, due to the fact that we evolved on earth you wouldve evolved to not be able to hear that frequency.

      • evranch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Luke!

        WHAT?

        LUKE! I AM YOUR…

        WHAAAT? TURN YOUR LIGHTSABER OFF IF YOU GOT SOMETHING TO SAY

        HELL NO YOU TURN OFF YOUR LIGHTSABER BOY

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Horseshit. Don’t piss on my head and tell me it’s raining.

    Edit: this is more horseshit like the “room temperature superconductor” that was instantly debunked as a horseshit scheme recently.

    Sound pressure waves cannot distort spacetime

    • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      considering the lab experiment with just one laser required a sound level of about 140 decibels that consume 20 gigawatts, I don’t think holodecks are going to be a practical device.

      • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Great points, but you know how things go. Proof of concept is a bloated laboratory implementation, then the tech gets smaller and more efficient over time. Next thing you know the sound is outside of human hearing range and the laser projector is fitted to a drone.

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          More realisticly how things go, experimental research only works in lab conditions, clickbait article suggests it’s coming next year, people make giant assumptions, people lose faith in science because the promised thing doesn’t arrive

          • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lol probably, we are definitely more on track for cyberpunk or idiocracy than star trek post scarcity socialist utopia

      • ThoGot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It may be interesting to see how humidity and temperature influence the laser (or even other gases as mentioned in the article)

      • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was the laser that’s 20 gigawatts, according to the article, which is notable because such a laser is hard to redirect.

        As for the viability of holodecks… Obviously the rest of your points are still valid, but one can only hope that someday we’ll figure something out, the technology being impossible/unviable right now doesn’t mean it’ll stay that way. And this seems to show a theoretical possibility of manipulating light mid-air in the necessary way.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Space battles would be so much cooler if every now and then the phaser gets split around the ship instead of hitting the shields.

    Would also work even when shields are down.

        • LinuxSBC@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A mirror? Light won’t reflect off of nothing. The closest you’ll get is gravitational lensing, but that requires about a galaxy’s worth of mass to make any noticeable difference.

    • Brokkr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would happen regardless of the power of the laser, but it would likely be undetectable at significantly lower power.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Green laser beams have been deflecting off nothing but air since we invented green lasers. That’s why they are visible without adding smoke.