For anyone wondering if Threads and Facebook at large will be a fine neighbor in the space and compatible with other apps/services in the fediverse: they’re already automatically hiding comments that mention Pixelfed https://mastodon.social/@dansup/112126250737482807

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Huh, well look at that. Meta being exactly as bad a corporate citizen as one would expect. This is why defederation is wise. I have no patience for the folks who think we’re somehow not being fair to poor old Meta.

    Support the fedipact.

    Push your instance to defederate.

    They are not and will never be a positive contributor to the fediverse. It’s another thing to exploit, enshittify, and ruin for them, that’s all.

    https://wedistribute.org/2023/06/fedipact-blocking-meta/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook#Criticisms_and_controversies

    Edit: I’ll be one more guy posting this link so interested folks can easily check if their instance has defederated, and make a decision from there. https://fedipact.veganism.social/

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t jump right to EEE because more and more folks who weren’t alive (or aware) for the early examples of it don’t seem to believe it’s possible or could happen again. However, I agree with you entirely.

        • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Unfortunately some people do not want to acknowledge that our large businesses are downright evil. For those who doubt this, consider the pharmaceutical companies that raised insulin prices up to hundreds of dollars a month. They did not give a single shit that people would die, so long as they increased profit from their captive audience. If big business doesn’t even care whether you live or die, why would they care about the much smaller stakes involved in the federated ActivityPub space?

      • balancedchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Oh no, it was everywhere, and I got into some decent arguments with those lovely people who ask you to show them how it’s going to have any effect on the fediverse at all, complete with citations.

        WeLl hOw Do YoU KnOw?

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Let’s just give them a chance guys. They haven’t done anything bad yet. It will help the fediverse grow. We need their content

      wE cAn AlwAyS dEfeDeraTe lAtEr. It dEfinIteLy WoN’T bE tOo LaTe tHeN

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Behold unfettered capitalism in all its glory.

    “We only stay successful if we hide evidence of alternatives”

  • wagesj45@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I thought @dansup already committed to blocking federation with Meta. Why does he care if they’re shutting him out, too?

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The only thing that saved Meta/Web3 from creating a special hell where digital rent seeking pervades all social interaction is that capitalism is too advanced at this point to create a market before trying to squeeze every last drop of blood out of it.

  • wagoner@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I followed the link to the mastodon post and saw this edit

    “Edit: As mentioned below, it appears to be a bug, not intentional!”

  • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’d be a damn shame if everyone started putting pixelfed at the end of every message to both deny threads content and create a Streisand effect.

  • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wish I could go back to a Lemmy thread showing how Mastodon and other Fediverse instances were blocking Meta ahead of it’s integration, where people went “Oh you’re just being paranoid, why would they do that?” And when given examples of companies taking open standards and either making themselves the biggest source of users or killing it (Microsoft, Google, Apple) they either went “Well that happened in 2006, it’s 2023!”

    I know the bootlickers wouldn’t actually change their mind, but jesus christ. It’s frustrating for groups of advocates to be ignored and proven right each time. Cassandra syndrome is real.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I just feel like this strategy won’t work for activitypub. The whole idea is to make interoperable web platforms. If meta tries to damage that then I don’t see why activitypub developers would cooperate when it’s against the whole purpose of the project.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I don’t think you have to know how the poison works to know the snake bite will kill you.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook#Criticisms_and_controversies

            They will come here (edit: They HAVE come here) with a goal of exploiting and controlling the fediverse. You and I don’t have to know how they will do that in order for it to be true. Scrubbing links to a product that competes with Instagram from threads seems like a decent start though.

            • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I mean I am completely unsurprised by their misbehavior, I’m just slightly more optimistic about our ability to resist them.

              That said, the one danger I can see is Meta gaining more authority over the activitypub developers. That is probably something worth being vigilant about.

              • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’m just slightly more optimistic about our ability to resist them.

                What form would such resistance take if not advocating loudly for defederation?

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I was one of those people that said “let’s see if they will be acceptable neighbors” and well, it seems we have an answer.

    If it’s true then I now favor defederation.

    Edit: it sounds like this wasn’t true.

    • Forbo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      So something changed between then and now. Wish the picture had absolute timestamps instead of the relative ones. I’m on mobile so I’m not about to try to dive into EXIF to find out when that was happening.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I just…

    I just do not get the twitter framework for social media. Like I appreciate you mastodon bros, but what the hell is actually going on over there. I had the same issue with twitter. What the hell even is this?

    • Moderator@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I never really got the Twitter model either. Following a specific individual is a weird one for me; I’d rather follow an idea or a topic instead (Reddit/lemmy/forums). I honestly don’t care enough about any individual user to the point where I want to know what they have to say about… anything, really.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        twitter was made for famous people to spew short thoughts at the masses in a long term plan of selling advertising.

    • ggwithgg@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s an convenient way to post about some trending topic, without creating a whole new community for something temporary. For example the eurovision sing festival, or some natural disaster that happened.

      And on the other hand, it works for expressing some personal thoughts or memes without having to adhere to a specific topic. But with random strangers instead of only your facebook friends.

      I think for these kind of needs, no other social media framework would comply better.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I guess I get it, but like, sorting by all or new kind of does the same thing…

        I do see that it is popular, but the ‘feel’ is just that its a bunch of people shouting at each other across a cafeteria.

        • dustycups@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          You don’t like a bunch of people shouting at each other across a cafeteria? It kind of explains why I never got twitter either.

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          This is basically how I feel about Instagram. I just can’t understand why people use the platform, or even how they do.

          Every time I try to use the app, I just end up closing it in frustration a couple of minutes later. What’s the point in following people when the algorithm is just going to show me a randomized assortment of their posts from the past week where every one is followed by a “suggested” post from somebody I don’t follow and then a “sponsored” post (ad). And then it stops after like 20 posts and refuses to load any more because “You’re all caught up from the past 3 days!”, even if I haven’t opened it in 5 months.

          I guess following people whose content you’re interested in has gone out of style in favor of consuming whatever the algorithm vomits up in front of you. I feel like even Tik Tok does a better job of letting you see content from people you’re following, and that thing is basically all algorithm.

          And now I sound like my parents in the 2010s trying to figure out why people use Facebook…