• amio@kbin.social
    5·
    3 months ago

    Specifically what is your problem with those? You haven’t really explained anywhere in the thread. It’s kinda relevant for knowing what to recommend.

    • VanHalbgott@lemmus.orgOPEnglish
      17·
      3 months ago

      They aren’t really good at giving facts and information compared to what I want to believe.

      I read the Bible for a living and would like to believe in that or anything about the Bible rather than go down a Internet rabbit-hole.

      GotQuestions.org is a ministry I trust that deals with appropriate information based on the Bible itself whereas on Wikipedia or TV Tropes people can put and believe anything they want whereas I want some form of authority to have.

      They say you shouldn’t believe everything you see on the Internet and I would rather follow a religious text that benefits me more.

      Unfortunately, some people tend to abuse their own humanity at the expense of their own kind.

      • Susaga@ttrpg.networkEnglish
        6·
        3 months ago

        I was afraid of that, but given some of your previous posts, I’m not all that surprised.

        Since both those sites are just descriptions of things that exist, it sounds like you want an echo chamber where you don’t need to acknowledge that certain things exist. I think it’s better to try and figure out why you’re so offended by reality.

  • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
    4·
    3 months ago

    I think the next step down from Wikipedia is an actual encyclopedia. Also news websites for archives.

    What are your concerns with these sites?

  • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.socialEnglish
    2·
    3 months ago

    I don’t know if it’s good yet, but I think one of the Lemmy devs is trying to make a federated Wikipedia. I honestly don’t see the need for it, but it’s his time and if he wants to work on it, great. I wish him well.