YouTube wants me to watch a 4m30s ad for middle-aged men who want to stay healthy. I won’t watch it. Hence, it never goes away.

I suppose this makes sense… I won’t play almost any video that has an ad that doesn’t have a 5s timeout button. I even skip those, most of the time.

I download videos using Downie, youtube-dl, or yt-dlp, and I watch them offline. So, the result is that I never complete the super long ad that YouTube wants me to watch, hence, it never stops being offered. I think that’s what’s going on here.

I just wanted to run a sanity-check to see if others agree that this is why this extreme garbage is being served. It can’t be that YouTube is serving ~5m ads to lots of people on a regular basis and people let them play, right? I think people would be outraged if this was common. But I’m not sure.

Background (unnecessary info to provide context):

I live in a nearly ad-free world because I deliberately cut them out with software. Thus I don’t really have a good sense of what average people tolerate. I haven’t tolerated ads for over 20 years. That’s when I cut the cord on television and switched to pirating content, later buying from iTunes, then streaming when that became available.

I live in a bubble and was offended at the idiocy of TV ads when I’d visit family for the holidays back when the iPod was on every single ad-break (and I’m an Apple / Mac user). I been un-desensitized for so long that TV ads have seemed alien and offensive for a long time.

It has to be that I keep getting this ad because I won’t complete YouTube’s stupid challenge-quest of “watch a super long ad one time,” right? I won’t complete the challenge to confirm that it goes away, so I need others to tell me if they think I’m right that this is why I keep seeing it. If I let it play, do you think they’d serve short ads again and it would be rare for such a long ad to be served? I’m not going to do so either way. Fuck YouTube and fuck ads.

Aside: when I can no longer download videos to avoid ads, I’ll stop watching YouTube videos. Spare me your lectures on them needing monetization to pay for servers. We won’t agree for reasons beyond the scope of this question.

Thanks in advance for your feedback!

  • BlueJayOakerson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Just pay the $10 for ad free. It’s a shitty answer, but one of the only services that’s still worth it if you use it enough.

    YouTube is the only streaming service I pay for at all and haven’t had to deal with ads in years

    $10-14 (whatever it is) per month for music, podcasts, informational vids/diy, etc. Then just pirating any shows is the only way to do it nowadays. No ads and still exponentially cheaper than tv 20 years ago which was pretty much 50% ads.

    • Usually_Lurker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s like $15 a month now. I paid for premium when it was $10 and included music streaming. When the raised the price 50% I immediately cancelled. I use Smart Tube Next on my Sheild and have Firefox focus on iOS. + PiHole, + unlock Origin. Ads can go screw themselves.

        • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          Google data mines the fuck out of me, even with all my blocking of ads. So yeah I think YouTube without ads is fair trade for all the money they’ve made off my data. They don’t get my money as well as being able to do whatever they want with my data.

          • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Decent rebuttal. I like it and can even accept it.

            You are the very first person to have a reasonable answer, other than the guys that are like me and just say that I’m too cheap to pay for it, I can totally at least respect the honesty therein.

            I mean nowadays I just use ad supported versions.

            Other than the Hulu Disney combo, but I think that’s worth the money with Fox, Marvel, and Disney movies on it.

            I used to have prime, Netflix, and Hulu but then they got greedy as fuck

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          No but I don’t think I must enrich billion dollar corporations with my valuable attention span either so they can continue to exploit and extract labour value from the working class if you want to get philosophical about it.

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, it’s a shitty answer, when there are multiple free options that eliminate the problem.

    • Demonmariner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Totally agree. For-profit platforms won’t exist if they can’t generate revenue, either from ads or subscriptions. If I use a commercial offering I expect to pay for it.

      If you use the platform and sidestep paying, you’re just foisting the expense off on paying customers.