• andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I use TikTok routinely. I actually spend time on Chinese parts of TikTok, because I know a little Chinese. I’ve seen content that the CCP would be very much opposed to - including discussions of the Tank Man from Tiananmen Square and homosexuality in Chinese history.

      TikTok has censorship certainly, but it’s more targeted towards the Gaza conflict.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I use TikTok routinely.

        Your experience is different from other experience. That’s the main issue. They are and can target specific people in specific groups and in specific regions. You seeing this content just means you’re not important enough for them to target.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          As can/do Facebook and every other social media platform. But I find it hard to take this idea that TikTok is an arm of the CCP seriously when I routinely discuss Ughyur Muslims and Tiananmen square with folks, and see depictions of Chairman Mao as Pooh Bear.

          The more shady shit is the shop and how every third video is an unlabeled ad. TikTok wants to make money first and foremost. I don’t think TikTok is some force for good in the world, but what they are doing is no different from what Meta and Google are doing.

          • jaschen@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Tiktok has one of the worse/non existent monetization programs. Its clearly not important to them how bad it is.

            My extended family in Taiwan would routinely see fake news on Tiktok during the Taiwan elections.

            That’s the thing. You don’t know. Nobody knows except the CCP. That’s the problem.

            • pop@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              That’s the thing. You don’t know. Nobody knows except the CCP. That’s the problem.

              But you do about every other social media platform?

              Fake news is not exclusive to a single platform. Teach your family about reputable news sources and stop trying to shoehorn US propaganda down everyone’s throats like it makes you look smart. Tiktok learned everything it does by the likes of facebook, Google and Twitter.

              Why do you think US social media is everywhere all over the world with near instant or sometimes even get higher bandwidth preference in some countries? If you don’t think the US government has nothing to do with the level of complexities that entails dealing with local governments/infrastructure and planning, then I guess “ignorance is a bliss”, and I hope the US government will bring you peace and much freedumb. Don’t complain when they come in blasting tho.

              • jaschen@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s one thing to have fake news that is uncontrolled. It’s another thing when a literal adversary uses fake news as a tool to create discourse.

                A social media company has one thing in mind. Profits. Even if it means that a byproduct of profits is discourse. But TikTok sole purpose is discourse. They literally don’t care about profits.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I doubt it, parents will just move them to YouTube, Instagram, or some other platform. The TikTok ban is intended to limit misinformation by the CCP, and that doesn’t really matter for this age of kids.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The more important thing to me is building habits. I care less about how much they’re watching vs how they’re spending their time generally.

              We have a rule where our kids need to read to be able to watch/play games, and we cap at 2hr/day. If they read 1hr, they can watch/play for 30min. My kids seem to have a pretty good mix of reading, watching/playing, and playing outside w/ friends, so I think it works.

              • GladiusB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yea. We do something similar. It’s an electronic allowance. If you use it it’s done for the day. I change it for rainy days and vacations if we are traveling in the car or whatever. But it’s easy to set up with Google family. And then you can see what they are doing. Not to be snoopy. Just to teach them the right way to protect themselves online. I don’t want them to turn 18 and be completely lost.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I give my kids 30 min “free” on Saturdays, which gets doubled if they spend it in a game with a sibling. For trips, I make my kids all do the same thing, so either watch the same show, listen to the same audiobook, etc.

                  I personally don’t digitally track what my kids do at all, I instead rely on trust and keeping devices in a public space. I tell them what’s acceptable, and occasionally hang out with them while they’re doing whatever. As they follow the rules, I give them more autonomy (e.g. my oldest may get their own PC soon-ish), but if they break the rules, they lose access. The only parental controls I use is for my 4yo, because she keeps getting into my Steam Deck and Switch w/o asking, but my other kids know the passcode on the Switch (not my Steam Deck, that’s mine).

                  It’s a bit bumpy, but I’m hopeful that having rules but no actual walls teaches them to learn to self-regulate and will help them in the long-run. It worked for me as a kid.

                  • GladiusB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    My oldest is a gamer just like me. We hang out in discords. That’s why I monitor him. It’s not necessarily him or the friends I know about that worry me. It’s the random pedo like people that can come from many games and many interactions.

                    The youngest just watches silly videos and doesn’t have a gaming bone in her body. So I just try to make it fair. Since they both need time away.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wait, is there another psyops software the CCP has deployed in the US?

        • BlueJayOakerson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Probably plenty. Tik tok is just the biggest owned by a foreign government that also is showing pretty immediate extreme negative effects on children’s attention spans and learning capabilities.

          But people are still gonna whine because they’re 25 year olds who need to watch 80 videos of unboxing shoes in 4 minutes . That’s really the only pro tik tok argument there is.

          • neo (he/him)@lemmy.comfysnug.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It sets a pretty chilling precedent that non-American competition can be forced to sell to Americans for (insert arbitrary reason here).

            I am in favor of TikTok at least becoming restricted to adults only if not outright banned, just warning about the consequences of doing it this way.

            • jaschen@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s owned by the CCP who is currently trying to undermine our election. It tried to do it in Taiwan where I currently live.

            • BlueJayOakerson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              It really doesn’t set a bad precedent forcing a foreign adversary to have less control over the US population. We should really force the sale of a lot of Chinese properties in the US as well. A foreign government should not have so much control over rental and housing prices in the US.

              Why are you pro foreign adversary controlling the daily lives of Americans? It’s a very odd stance to take and openly say unless you’re not American obviously.

      • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        People love to repeat this, but US companies aren’t coming from a place of hostile intent like china’s special brand of tik tok for the states.

        • endhits@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They’re both focused on profit. The only reason you see the other one as scary is because it’s owned by the scary scary Chinese. Red scare all over again.

          • jaschen@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            No tiktok is not focused on profit. It literally has one of the worst/non existent monetization systems.

              • jaschen@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Case in point. Vine literally can’t survive and so shouldn’t TikTok. Unless of course it’s getting propped up by a government with endless funds and not focused on profits.

                • jorp@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  What’s the connection between Uber and China, then? I thought it was somewhat common for tech companies to be unprofitable for very long periods of time backed only by capital, but it may be China. Has anyone looked into this? Does Xi know what I like to order on weekends? Why haven’t we banned this yet

          • jumjummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You say “red scare” as if China isn’t a hostile nation state to the US. Go look at western company penetration in China if you want. Are you calling it “western scare” when China blocks yet another western company? I didn’t think so.

            • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Because the USA strong armed them into giving their platform handling to Oracle Corp, a top tier US govt contractor.

              But since pro-palestine cries can’t be silenced on TikTok as easily as Zio media, taking control of the platform is no longer enough

          • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s not the same. China wants to fuck up the American youth. That’s why their version of tiktok is so different from ours. But you already knew that I’m sure

            • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Nah, I don’t use tiktok, Chinese or otherwise so I wouldn’t know the difference. But you’re missing the point.

              • USA organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
              • Chinese organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.

              And yet, you claim one is inheritly worse than the other or should be preferered. To me, they are equally bad. If anything, the USA manipulation is worse - they can use that knowledge more easily and to greater effect than an attacker on the other side of the world.

              • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago
                • USA organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
                • Chinese organisationsgenocidal dictatorship abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
              • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Are the American companies doing it in pursuit of destabilizing the United States population for the betterment of the CCP and its interests?

                Is the Chinese company doing it in pursuit of destabilizing the United States population for the betterment of the CCP and its interests?

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hmm, here’s what Zuckerberg said when he launched Facebook:

          According to SAI sources, the following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:

          Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

          Zuck: Just ask.

          Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

          [Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

          Zuck: People just submitted it.

          Zuck: I don’t know why.

          Zuck: They “trust me”

          Zuck: Dumb fucks.

          Brutal.

          Could Mark have been completely joking? Sure. But the exchange does reveal that Facebook’s aggressive attitude toward privacy may have begun early on.

          They may not be trying to control elections (they certainly have their fingers in that pie too), but they’re still hostile to users.

      • ealoe@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Unironically yes, at least the US government is something we can openly criticize and attempt to change while living within its borders. Try criticizing the Chinese government from within China, let me know how that works out for you. I’ll take homegrown American spyware any day.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not in American businesses best interest overthrow a government. Can’t say the same for the CCP tho. Fuck the CCP.

          • jaschen@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Wow, that is literally 1 example of an obscure time in the early 19th century.

            A mass majority of an American company has zero interest to hurt the community it is based in. The stability of a government and the strength of it’s community determines if people would buy/use a product. It also supplies a competent workforce and a network of security that helps a company prosper.