Windows 10 EoL is fast approaching, so I thought I’d give Linux a try on some equipment that won’t be able to upgrade to Windows 11. I wanted to see if I will be able to recommend an option to anyone that asks me what they should do with their old PC.

Many years ago I switched to Gentoo Linux to get through collage. I was very anti-MS at the time. I also currently interact with Linux systems regularly although they don’t have a DE and aren’t for general workstation use.

Ubuntu: easy install. Working desktop. Had issues with getting GPU drivers. App Store had apps that would install but not work. The App Store itself kept failing to update itself with an error that it was still running. It couldn’t clear this hurdle after a reboot so I finally killed the process and manually updated from terminal. Overall, can’t recommend this to a normal user.

Mint: easy install. Switching to nvidia drivers worked without issue. App Store had issues with installing some apps due to missing dependencies that it couldn’t install. Some popular apps would install but wouldn’t run. Shutting the laptop closed results in a prompt to shutdown, but never really shuts off. Update process asks me to pick a fast source (why can’t it do this itself?)

Both: installing apps outside of their respective stores is an adventure in terminal instead of a GUI double-click. Secure boot issues. Constant prompt for password instead of a simple PIN or other form of identity verification.

Search results for basic operations require understanding that what works for Ubuntu might not work for Mint.

While I personally could work with either, I don’t see Linux taking any market share from MS or Apple when windows 10 is retired.

  • s_s@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Non-FOSS operating systems treat me like a product.

    That’s not good enough.

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Linux is plenty ready for “most users.” I recently saw a meme that applies here, about experts/enthusiasts overestimating the “average normie” in their field even when they’re trying to account for most people not being on their level.

    GPU Drivers, app stores

    “Most users” scroll Facebook or Twitter and watch Netflix. Distro comes with firefox? GG. 🤷‍♂️ While I don’t think its widespread (and hope lol,) ever since the Facebook app integrated a web browser there are people (usually younger iirc) who think Facebook IS the internet. Loads of people almost wouldn’t notice if you switched their os overnight, if they have a desktop/laptop at all.

    As for people looking to change to Linux due to MS business decisions, let’s be real - they’re by and large already techies. Its also not the 90s anymore, there are resources abound and SOOOO many users to have your problem before you do.

    Personal nitpick for me, nothing to do with OP but the overall sentiment - Using the terminal is NOT THAT BALL CRUSHINGLY HARD as people still make it out to be, certainly not for stuff you may need it for in modern times. I have fedora, I need spotify. “sudo dnf install Spotify” “y” ta da. Certainly not an adventure, IMO.

    • hedidwot@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Your post misses the entire point.

      While us nerds can work out problems and use a terminal, it doesn’t mean we’re happy to spend our time trouble shooting instead of actually getting shit done.

      And the fact that so many of these basic issues should exist in the first place leaves one with the sour taste that they have to hold the OS’s hand forever.

    • ji17br@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You really have no clue how inept “most users” are. I’d be extremely surprised if even 20% of the population would be able to use Linux without getting extremely frustrated at the first error, and unable to fix anything themselves.

  • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t think this is an unpopular opinion in general. (If you ignore the Lemmy Linux echo chamber).

  • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I also currently interact with Linux systems regularly although they don’t have a DE and aren’t for general workstation use.

    🚩🚩🚩

    A line used by every concern troll.

  • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I switched over a year ago and have had zero issues. The lemmings will surely stick with and defend w11, while the people that are tired of being spied on for their data to be better advertised to will move to Linux and realize how bad it was on windows and not believe they didn’t switch sooner.

  • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sorry but most of those points can easily be applied to Windows too. But yes, if you cannot even do simple configuration options, which there’s GUIs for too, or differentiate between distros / Windows versions, then I’m afraid even Windows is not ready to replace Windows.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Poor take. 3.1, NT4, 95, 98SE, 2000, xp, 10. All were widely considered to be a considerable improvement over the OS they replaced.

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        sure good old fashioned stuff from when I was a baby or something excluding 10 which really didn’t offer much apart from more telemetry than ever and even more convoluted system settings menus. I’ll let the pre-10 releases that weren’t total garbage slide but any widely considered improvement going forward at least will be shills, bots, and ai articles, calling it now.

        • Brkdncr@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I suspect with MS pushing their products to be based on webview2 (teams, new outlook, etc) that the next OS they release will be designed for a more efficient cpu architecture, similar to what Apple is doing. Like vista, it will probably suck until it gains more mainstream support.

        • Brkdncr@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Vista was a sacrifice. They needed vista to be awful so 8+ could fly.

          ME was designed by the marketing team.

          • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I really liked Vista, it was the first stable Windows for me that I didn’t have to reinstall once in a while.

            Never used 8, I hated it.

            Millennium wasn’t just a stunt, but it got bad reputation bcs of not-really compatible drivers with W98.

  • folkrav@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Honestly… I love Linux with all my heart. I can firsthand say that the Linux Desktop is 20 thousand times better than when I got into it around the first Ubuntu betas, but it’s still quite a mess in certain areas. It often boils down to the hardware and software you expect to run on it (or viable alternatives, if they exist) being compatible or not.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Most people don’t install anything beyond office tools (and even those are switching to various cloud systems).

    Also, I know it is was a thing, but I never had driver issues (ok, one wifi card in like 2005), I think drivers aren’t really an issue anymore, maybe some proprietary stuff (fingerprint readers?).
    (As a funny side note, I have a wired laptop I can’t get good Win drivers, but works perfectly out of the box with at least a few distros (openSUSE, Fedora, Debian).)

    I manage 3 computers for my family, all run Linux for 10+ years. And I upgrade them frequently (with my old components most of the time :)). As I don’t live with any of them I don’t really want issues that would prevent their use. And beyond some bigger updates (versions or largely change from X11 to Wayland) over the years there is like an issue every few years. And now they all run Tumbleweed, so so no versions (set to upade monthly for their convenience).

    Oh, and the og reason for Linux was because there were always constant issues with Windows. Im not gonna install XPs every few months.

  • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I need to disagree on pretty much all points. I switched both my mother and an old friend of mine to linux and neither of them had any major issues. They’re not technical people, but they understood the basics needed for everyday use without problem.

    I swear, half the issues people report after trying out linux are entirely related to the nvidia drivers and nothing else.