cross-posted from: https://midwest.social/post/14304762

Over the course of several months in 2024, TIME spoke to more than 40 people in the Granbury area who reported a medical ailment that they believe is connected to the arrival of the Bitcoin mine: hypertension, heart palpitations, chest pain, vertigo, tinnitus, migraines, panic attacks. At least 10 people went to urgent care or the emergency room with these symptoms. The development of large-scale Bitcoin mines and data centers is quite new, and most of them are housed in extremely remote places. There have been no major medical studies on the impacts of living near one. But there is an increasing body of scientific studies linking prolonged exposure to noise pollution with cardiovascular damage.

  • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Technically there is federal mandate to regulate noise, which stems from the 1972 Noise Control Act—but it was essentially de-funded during the Reagan administration.”

    Of course it was. It’s always fucking Reagan (or Thatcher)

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The root cause issue could be power plants used to supply energy to the datacenters running the computers (there are many things a power plant can do to harm its environment), or if we consider electromagnetic hypersensitivity not being a pseudoscientific term but an actual thing; electromagnetic waves coming from all the computers at the same time in a concentrated space could have triggered this whole ordeal.

    I can’t really think of any other possibilities, and I highly believe first one is the case.

    • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah but how is this any different than living next to ANY data center? Bitcoin mining is just racks of servers doing what servers do- sucking power, venting heat. A GPU farm for ai training or an AWS data center wouldn’t be any different, and this isn’t being widely reported as an issue. I wonder how the leap from chest pain to “it’s the bitcoins!!” happened.

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I wonder how the leap from chest pain to “it’s the bitcoins!!” happened.

        CryptoFUD or clickbait or both.

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Didn’t claim otherwise, but the title is clear clickbait. It’s a matter of a crap “datacenter” regardless of the data being processed. Could be AI of your tax returns, it just so happens to be cryptocurrency so let’s put that in the title.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Normal datacenters aren’t constructed out if metal shipping containers with external fans blowing through them. Most just look like big warehouses and don’t emit 90db of noise (between a lawnmower and a chainsaw as noted in the article).

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Data centers are normally built with good security, and solid walls that keeps the roar of the fans inside. It seems like this mining outfit took the cheap road, and just set up shipping containers with servers inside them instead of building an actual building.

        Still, these people shouldn’t be mad at the bitcoiners, they should be mad at the state laws that allow these machines to be as loud as they are with no real penalty. Maybe they should write their State Legislature and tell them the bitcoin mines are killing innocent child processes in broad daylight, since abortion is all they seem to care about.

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Didn’t you listen to the other old man in the debate? Liberals advocate for termination of child processes even after they have spawned!

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            But this has nothing to do with bitcoin, other than the pop-up datacenter’s purpose is to mine it. They could have popped up a datacenter for any other purpose, and it would have the same issues.

            OTOH, the State can solve this today, either by instituting regulations or allowing the county to. Heck, just putting walls and a ceiling around the thing will help. But the mining outfit, like any good Capitalist, will not spend a dime unless it is forced to, and this state thinks regulations are a tool of the devil herself.

            • Ioughttamow@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I think it’s fair to be mad at the data center. Whether that nuisance is legal or not, and the lawmakers as well

    • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well there is not really any reason to speculate if you read the article. They say it’s the sound. It reaches 90 decibels right outside of people’s homes. Some people are literally losing their hearing, and doctors in the article say that exposure to loud sounds can cause all of these heart issues.

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    A question that comes to mind: Is there a power plant nearby that’s been running at a higher level since the Bitcoin mine settled there? The issue might not be just noise pollution.

  • asap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    🙄 Sounds a lot like this classic example where residents complained about headaches, rashes, nausea, tinnitus, etc from a cell tower, only for it to be revealed that it was not powered up:

    https://mybroadband.co.za/news/wireless/11099-massive-revelation-in-iburst-tower-battle.html

    “Headaches, nausea, tinnitus, dry burning itchy skins, gastric imbalances and totally disrupted sleep patterns…”

    At the meeting Van Zyl agreed to turn off the tower with immediate effect to assess whether the health problems described by some of the residents subsided. What Craigavon residents were unaware of is that the tower had already been switched off in early October – six weeks before the November meeting where residents confirmed the continued ailments they experienced.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      '[The Constable measures the sound level at 91dB, the max that his decibel metre can record]

      This level of noise, the CDC writes, can cause hearing damage after two hours of exposure. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration advises that employees can only work in 90-decibel settings for eight hours a day and are required to wear ear protection. And Texas state penal code deems any noise above 85 decibels unreasonable. Over the course of 2024, [the Constable] has recorded a noise above 85 decibels coming from the plant more than 35 times. "

      Whilst the health concerns reported are the thing that would make these complaints more serious (if true), this level of noise is also just insanely high from a nuisance perspective, even if the health problems of the town are unrelated.

    • mrpants@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It could be but also datacenters are ridiculously loud and the sound is very high pitched. Would drive anyone nuts if they could hear it.

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        On the inside, yeah maybe; but a properly designed data center shouldn’t be louder than any typical building on the outside. But hey, this is in a rural Texas town, so I won’t be surprised if the building is not up to code.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Huh? That makes no sense. High pitched sounds are attenuated VERY easily and the only sound you could ever hear outside the dozen or so I’ve worked in/around you could only hear the HVAC gear outside. There’s a reason why when you go see a concert outside there’s a linear array of horns facing the audience while the subs are under the stage.

        • mrpants@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I agree. So if people are hearing it and demonstrating it with decibel readers then there’s probably little to no sound dampening.

      • Fuzzypyro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        They are deafening but usually they are very well insulated seeing as keeping servers cool is very expensive and extremely important.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m no bitcoin mining apologist for sure but this is just crap journalism. There’s a story like this for all kinds of industries in small towns with poor health. There are lots of industries that noise pollute (a lot of people live near airports) and I’m all for reasonable regulations to limit noise pollution, but this has boogeyman tinfoil hat nonsense all over it.