Google 1970s Iran vs now. It’s an interesting contrast of how quickly societies can change; and some would argue, not towards the future but backwards.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    160
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    “how could they have let this happen!”

    -people in a country where people are making it happen

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also, if you know any Iranians, they don’t wear hijab in the house there.

      So yes, this photo would still be possible.

      (And of course I am strongly against the theocracy in Iran)

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        one of my closest friends from high school has an iranian mom. mom and sister never wore hijabs, though only in the states. when they visited iran they did. but at the end of they day, they’re people just like anyone else who has fanatical religious psychos trying to control everything

    • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      America helped

      The beginning

      U.S. and British intelligence agencies help elements in the Iranian military overthrow Iran’s prime minister, Mohammed Mossadeq. This follows Mossadeq’s nationalization of the Britain-owned Anglo-Persian Oil Company, which led London to impose an oil embargo on Iran. The coup brings back to power the Western-friendly monarchy, headed by Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Deeply unpopular among much of the population, the shah relies on U.S. support to remain in power until his overthrow in 1979.

      Then

      The shah flees amid widespread civil unrest and eventually travels to the United States for cancer treatment. Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, a Shiite cleric who opposed the shah’s Westernization of Iran, returns to the country after fourteen years in exile. Khomeini takes power as the supreme leader in December, turning Iran from a pro-West monarchy to a vehemently anti-West Islamic theocracy. Khomeini says Iran will try to “export” its revolution to its neighbors. In 1985, the militant group Hezbollah emerges in Lebanon and pledges allegiance to Khomeini.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        america also helped the taliban come to power. twice. but they don’t like to talk about that

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    YSK: Iran’s new incoming president, Masoud Pezeshkian, on the campaign trail presented as a moderate and said he would abolish Iran’s morality police, so the era of enforced Hijab might be coming to an end. He assumes office on the 30th and I expect there will be an internal struggle between his admin and established power over the issue, but since the morality police were a focal point of the last major protests there’s a lot of popular support for abolishing or at least reforming them.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Nobody ever posts the “Here’s a teenage boy who has been beaten bloody by the Shah’s secret police” photo from the 1970s

      Neither do we get the “Meet the PhD student who graduated without a penny of debt” from the 2020s.

      But the sepia photograph of a hot girl in a short dress? Literally the only evidence we have that Iran even exists.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh ok, then let me tell you that I’ve known a refugee from Iran. Or we could talk about the fact that they murder women for demanding rights.

        You seem to be defending a theocracy that stole participation in the public sphere from half its population. Rethink your life

    • Styxia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      (Sincere) are you implying that these pictures are the elite/upper class and the counter narrative is more the norm of the time?

      Edit: nvm, other comments in the feed seem to add further context.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I met this older, cool hippie lady at my old apartment building. She was always wearing the cool hippy style and was a very free spirit. She told me that she got the F out of Iran during the revolution. She hates going back to visit Iran cause she has to wear the head covering and be accompanied by a man, etc. She used to show me a bunch of pics similar to this one, of her and her young friends partying and enjoying life before the religious assholes ruined it all.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Note that she was able to get

      the F out of Iran during the revolution

      . People living like on this photo were not the majority by any measure. Those crowds of poor ignorant religious people yelling “ya hossein” were.

      People posting such photos say, of course, what they wanted to say. But westernization of Iran was not too different from what MBS is doing in Saudi Arabia. A monarch’s hobby.

      He even was self-confident enough to say in interviews that his oil-powered kingdom with the majority of population still living in middle ages is the future and the western nations are the past.

      Idealizing Shah’s Iran is one of the stupid things people do today all the time. I dunno why - to forget that the revolution was supported by the West? Only somehow mojaheds and others such forces turned out to be weaker than Homeini.

        • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'état

          It would not have happened without operation Ajax, which lead to the Islamic Revolution. The US backed the Shah because he wasn’t Mossaddegh or however you spell his name. The US simply did not want a socialist in power, and backing the Shah is part of what destroyed Iran. They gave not one shit about the Iranian people son.

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes, of course the US (and UK) essentially installed the Shah in Iran in 1953. That was not the Islamic Revolution.

            The CIA backed Islamic Revolution*

            The Islamic Revolution happened in 1979, and was by no means “CIA backed.”

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You have misunderstood the person you’re replying to. The Islamic revolution happened in 1979, 26 years after the separate CIA-backed coup. The CIA-backed one overthrew Mossadegh for a more monarchist rule under the Shah, Pahlavi. The Islamic one, which was not backed by the CIA, overthrew the Pahlavi dynasty and replaced it with a theocracy under Ayatollah Khomeini

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The people of Iran still struggle against theocratic oppression. They are occupied. Especially the women of Iran.

    Liberty, equality, sisterhood! Here, there, and everywhere!

  • lulztard@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Thanks, Murica. World’s biggest terrorist nation for over a hundred years.

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Totally uninformed atheist here but curious… does the jihad hijab requirement also persist indoors in ones own home? Are women required to wear it even when they are in their own homes? When is it acceptable to remove it?

    • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Assuming you’re asking for real, the hijab isn’t a requirement. And before I get too much shit, I’m an atheist that spends a lot of time in a Muslim country and sees first hand how it is nothing like most of the West is taught.

      To break it down simply: If you want to be a good Muslim, you need to be modest. For a women to be modest, covering their hair after puberty around men is common. Some take it further and dress in the niqab, the beekeeper style suit.

      Note that while some are “forced” to wear it, most are not. Socially it is the same as you’re allowed to wear a itsy bitsy teeny weeny yellow polka dot bikini, but most women would find that uncomfortable in the super market or Applebee’s. So they dress more modestly. The definition of what is modest just changes slightly.

      In your own home most do not wear the hijab since there’s no expectation of modesty around husbands and no need around kids or immediate family. But this is also true of public spaces where there aren’t men. Many places will have women’s only beach days or gyms or cafe days, etc and you’ll find women in there that are total strangers without coverings.

      The super strict places with morality police are not common. But thanks to US intervention, it is more common in Iran. Kind of like how if you wear a drag outfit downtown in Alabama, you’re going to have a bad time and in many US states, now get arrested.

      One of the modern things that has been an issue with West and middle East mixing is when hijabis (women who wear the hijab) go to like a bachelorette party or a women’s party and then take off their hijab. Then they do what they do and take a bunch of photos. The hijabis don’t post any of those on social media, they only post while covered because some reasoning is “you don’t know who or why someone is looking at a public photo”. But western women will just post them all. And this has been an issue for the past decade+. Back with film you “posed” and it was explicit it was to be shared. You wouldn’t waste 1/18th of your roll for nothing! But now it isn’t.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Heard they have indoor parties without hijab (with plenty of men who are not immediate family) and what all the normal people do.

        It’s mandatory only in public places, I think.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        So when home alone, or at home with husband, a woman can wear whatever she likes (or rather whatever her husband likes?)

        • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Whatever that husband wants, always. Women are not here to think. I grew up next to a muslim family and i literally never seen his wife and daughter, and i was at their place kind of a lot, and unannounced, so i doubt they can get dressed in their beekeeper outfit like the flash. Also thinking about it, i don’t think i heard them talk ever. I don’t even think they learned the language. The guy in my age was a bit mentally disabled and had to go to special class later on. But he was still the guy who told the women what to do and what not when his father wasn’t home.

          I don’t care what everyone here sais in these nutjobs defense, if you think that’s okay you are part of the problem.

  • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Actually, she would be able to dress like that today, because she appears to be in a private home.

    Unless there are unrelated men around, she doesn’t have to wear hijab.

      • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’m just trying to correct misinformation. I’m not giving an opinion.

        And unless you’re an Iranian woman, it doesn’t really matter what your opinion is. Very rarely has a Westerner giving their opinion on a foreign culture been helpful. Usually the opposite.