Children will be taught how to spot extremist content and misinformation online under planned changes to the school curriculum, the education secretary said.

Bridget Phillipson said she was launching a review of the curriculum in primary and secondary schools to embed critical thinking across multiple subjects and arm children against “putrid conspiracy theories”.

One example may include pupils analysing newspaper articles in English lessons in a way that would help differentiate fabricated stories from true reporting.

In computer lessons, they could be taught how to spot fake news websites by their design, and maths lessons may include analysing statistics in context.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m an oldish dude with fairly conservative liberal views and I think it’s absolutely essential that our children get taught this. The risk that this is Orwell’s 1984ish is minimal and the benefits far outweigh it.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Can someone teach the boomer generation too? They are vastly more susceptible to believing anything they read online

  • Konis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Extremist content” == “not wanting Palestinians to be dehumanized, dispossessed and murdered by Israel”

      • li10@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hopefully it tries to be as neutral as possible, and just gives kids the general tools to spot when something’s fake/exaggerated.

        Introducing this sort of thing without trying to be strictly impartial sounds like a slippery slope.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Hopefully it tries to be as neutral as possible

          No. Forcing a neutral perspective between absurdity and objectively true claims is how we got here.

          When one party says that scientific evidence is real and the other says it’s a Marxist conspiracy, forced neutralized lends undue credence to the latter.

          Similarly, forcibly neutral newsrooms and the neoliberal Starmer government consider it extremist to acknowledge that the fascist apartheid regime of Israel is committing genocide and to call for your country to not supply them with arms, funds, and political cover.

          It should try to be as FACTUAL and OBJECTIVE as possible, not chase neutrality when neutrality flies in the face of evidence and the most basic accountability and human rights.

          Introducing this sort of thing without trying to be strictly impartial sounds like a slippery slope.

          Yeah, they’re GOING to consider extremism as anything too far from the interests of the neoliberal and capitalist elite in either direction rather than pursue an evidence-based curriculum of critical thinking like they’re pretending.

        • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Obviously. But I’m referring to why this was planned, ie. some events led to this being deemed necessary. I’m guessing it’s alt-right radicalisation and post-truth politics, and not the recent Israeli Invasion of Gaza.

            • cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              sure, but now they have a reason to talk about this. If a teacher randomly talks about media bias kids are gonna think its weird as fuck and maybe tell parents, but now in this class

  • tiramichu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is great, honestly.

    If you go back to antiquity, education was about philosophy. It was about learning how to observe, and think critically, and see the world for what it is.

    And then in modern times, education became about memorisation - learning facts and figures and how to do this and that. And that way of teaching and learning just doesn’t fit any longer with what our digital age has become.

    In my opinion, we are heavily overdue for a revamp of what education should be, and what skills are most important to society in this post-truth world. Critical thinking is an important foundation to real knowledge that we don’t teach enough.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Critical thinking” was a buzzword when I was at school in the 80s.

      Memorisation is a component of learning, but the vast majority of any learning I’ve done has been understanding.

      Certainly children need to learn to be skeptical, but I hope we can do better than showing them biased articles from newspapers.

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Is it a buzzword though? I always took it as the ability to understand AND question in order to prove/disprove/ build upon said understanding.

        • FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think they mean that it was a buzzword because although it was mentioned, it wasn’t a substantial part of state education at the time. They’re saying that it “was” a buzzword, rather than that it is one.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The difference between intelligence and wisdom. We have been prioritizing the former at the detriment of the latter.

        This is how you end up with people like Elon Musk who I will give the benefit of the doubt and say he isn’t dumb, but Christ he’s a moron.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not sure you mean intelligence and wisdom.

          Intelligence is the capability to apply your brain to problems. Wisdom is the lessons you learn through experience.

          Maybe “knowledge Vs wisdom” is a better way of putting it.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If you go back to antiquity, education was about philosophy.

      Well, formal education was. I’m pretty sure ancient Greeks Athenians still had to be taught to do things like read, write, and follow instructions, at least if they were part of the upper or middle classes.

      Of course we should be doing a better job teaching students critical thinking skills, but let’s not fool ourselves into thinking ancient Greek children all spent their days having deep conversations with Aristotle in a park. Plato is even on record against reading because he thought it interfered with students’ ability to memorize things!

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is supposed to be happening everywhere. In the US, librarians mostly lead this initiative.

  • absquatulate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is rich, coming from the government that labels pro-palestine protestors as extremists and antisemites ( yes I’m aware that the government changed, but looks like the new ones are more than happy to continue the policies ).

    • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are many people in a government, and different people pull in different directions.

      Regardless of other policies, this is a step in the right direction.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        This is the UK: whatever New Labour or Tory politicians say should be presumed to be complete total crowd-pleasing bollocks until proven otherwise (by it actually being done, in the way it was promised and properly funded and supported, which is a pretty rare outcome over there).

      • absquatulate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s admittedly some potential in there, like teaching them to analyse statistics and ‘teaching critical thinking’ whatever that implies.

        Conspiracy theory belief however is emotional rather than rational. You cannot ‘teach’ people to not do it. I worry that they will condition kids to dismiss any news that deviates from official propaganda by just labelling them as conspiracies. And frankly with the UK being the police state that it is, that might just be the end goal.

  • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    and maths lessons may include analysing statistics in context.

    It always depresses me when people around can’t even do a crude estimation that would debunk unteuthful information. And this isn’t just about news - when you do any sort of math or experiment you should be able to make a crude estimation to eliminate mistakes.

    I can easily tell when I’m two orders of magnitude away from the correct result. It seems to be a rare skill apparently

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      All information has a bias, so teach that it all has a bias and ways to figure out the biases. Also include that we all have biases in everything we think.

  • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I learned critical thinking and news analysis when I was in school. No wonder England is doing so poorly if their kids aren’t

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I learned critical thinking and news analysis when I was in school.

      It wasn’t part of the curriculum when I was in school, but our physics teacher went above and beyond to make sure we got some lessons in critical thinking and skeptical media consumption.

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    One example may include pupils analysing newspaper articles in English lessons in a way that would help differentiate fabricated stories from true reporting.

    In computer lessons, they could be taught how to spot fake news websites by their design…

    and maths lessons may include analysing statistics in context.

    That these lessons haven’t been at the core of those subjects since forever is horrific.

    We have the same problem in NZ. Several generations of citizens generally lacking basic information processing skills. I suppose they make better consumers.