Last week, Microsoft mentioned in a support document that it was formally deprecating Windows’ 39-year-old Control Panel applets. But following widespread reporting of the change, Microsoft has either backtracked or clarified its language to remove the note about Control Panel being deprecated in favor of the Settings app. Here’s what the original post said, as also preserved by the Internet Wayback Machine (emphasis ours):

“The Control Panel is a feature that’s been part of Windows for a long time. It provides a centralized location to view and manipulate system settings and controls,” the support page explains. “Through a series of applets, you can adjust various options ranging from system time and date to hardware settings, network configurations, and more. The Control Panel is in the process of being deprecated in favor of the Settings app, which offers a more modern and streamlined experience.

The current version of the page has changed that last sentence considerably. It now says that “many of the settings in Control Panel are in the process of being migrated to the Settings app, which offers a more modern and streamlined experience.

It’s not clear whether this reflects a policy change or just a clarification of language. We’ve asked Microsoft whether it has changed plans to deprecate the Control Pane or if the original version of the support page was just incorrect in the first place, and we’ll update if we receive a response.

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Knew it. They won’t dare invalidate the 35-year-old government PDFs instructing people on how to enable their firewall or whatever.

  • John_CalebBradberton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If they just move the functionality of control panel to settings, I fail to see why this is such an issue.

    The only way this’d be a big deal is if they removed control panel without moving those functions to the settings app. Then it’d be annoying at least. Is that the case here?

    • BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Barely any of the functions actually moved, I’d rather the control panel stay just in case regardless, because i still find old fixes to problems i have on old forums and such.

      Which is also why my system language is set to english, so everything on the control panel will have a searchable name instead of a half assed translation that I’ll have to translate back.

  • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    the Settings app, which offers a more modern and streamlined experience.

    tl: “modern” means “less usable UI” and “streamlined” means “less functionality”

    • breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Less functionality as in “unable to open more than one panel at a time”

      I stg Windows, every new UI is aggravating half-baked drivel.

      (obligatory remark about the fact I mostly use Linux here)

      • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d classify that as under “less usable UI”. There’s two different concepts in interface design: utility (i.e. can it do what you need it to) and usability (i.e. how easy and effective to use is it).

        With utility/“less functionality” I was thinking about people saying they have to still open Control Panel because the “new” Settings still can’t do everything Control Panel can do after what, 12 years?

    • ThisIsNotHim@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s somewhat bizarre to me that the settings menu isn’t just a reskinned control panel that either launches the new or old items depending on what they’ve finished so far.

      I can’t imagine what they’ve done is easier than rewriting control panel items in full one by one.

      You can do a halfway decent job of modernizing just by having an “advanced” toggle that shows the more arcane/less used settings.

      I understand the desire to race towards a minimum viable product and get the core functionality into the glossy new thing, but they already had a minimum viable product in the control panel.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Someone found something that still depends on the control panel that will not be easily moved or done away with I bet.

    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      More like, the devs already knew but some middle manager promised they would remove it without understanding the ramifications, and now they’ve been schooled.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    lol they’re all like “oh the control panel is old and broken, we’re totally taking it to modern streamlined -ville”

    MSFT deveolper: “Uh, that modern streamlined -ville is the control panel. It’s the same code. It even has the same name. People will check you know.”

    “Upon further reflection, what we meant was . . . “

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Streamlined”

    What a fucking load of steaming bullshit. The Settings app is complete dogshit compared to Control Panel. If I want to click through 6 pages of nested settings pages for Networking, or 1 screen of all the settings in one place, I think I know which one I would call “streamlined”.

    Jackasses.

  • ben@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think this is likely to be what I saw others mention on earlier posts. Lots of enterprise or business software that hooks into the control panel.

    So even if Microsoft does migrate all the Windows options over to settings there’s still going to be software that uses control panel to manage their own settings.

    Unless Microsoft is going to make it possible to hook into the new settings app just as easily then they’re going to have to keep the old one around even though they keep crippling it.

    • FierySpectre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re probably just going to disable it for manual access and add a regkey that you can add to regain access. (They’ve done the same for other ‘deprecated’ features)

      • ben@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah it’s annoying as hell, wish they’d stop killing their own OS. I honestly think the first few builds of Windows 11 were a decent step in the right direction in terms of actually getting everything feeling relatively cohesive again. But the AI push and everything that happened right after release has started to let the rot creep back in again.

        Next GPU I get I’m just going to run Linux as my main OS and have a VM with a GPU pass through so I can stop losing my mind.

        • bizarroland@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve been thinking about testing that myself. There’s a few things that are just a little more intuitive for me on Windows versus Linux, and for the handful of games that prefer Windows configuration or makes it easier to game on Windows might be handy to have a way to access Windows without it being my daily driver.

          Then again, I have multiple computers and I already run Linux on my laptop which is the primary device that I use, I’m just talking about my game / audio workstation.

  • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The updated language is what they’ve been saying since a couple years after Windows 10 came out. This story just went back to not being news lol

  • underthesign@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why not just enable both? Have the control panel be available but more of a power user kind of thing, where the new Settings page is what gets pushed to the average user. Of course it’s more work to maintain both but last time I checked MS were doing alright for themselves and could probably afford it.

  • daggermoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t even use Windows anymore and I cringe at the thought of being forced to use the Settings app over Control Panel.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      As an occasional windows user I was trying to come up with a counter-example for you but I couldn’t think of one lol.

  • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Haven’t many settings in the control panel been in the process of being migrated to the settings app for the last uh, 15 years?

    I mean good for ya’ll at Microsoft, but

      • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It really feels like it shouldn’t be THAT hard of a thing to do: I mean shit, we’re 4 major releases into this, and they somehow managed to put all the features in the original control panel in uh, one release.

        • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          you need to keep in mind that microsoft is a small business, so they don’t have a lot of resorces to assign to this

          • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Honestly I’m waiting for Settings AI now with CoPilot which changes your configuration based on what you’re doing, and only sometimes does stupid shit that you have to stop and sort out.

            And then they’d have 3 control panel apps.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You need to keep in mind that Microsoft developers are only allowed to do what the marketing department wants to sell. Unglamorous fixes and improvements are left untouched for years or decades.

            • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              It will be driven my minimal viable product and running to a release at the end of every x sprints.

              They don’t have the time or structure to build long term plans and well considered features.

          • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            True, I was forgetting about the Shareholder Value™.

            Which is silly of me, because it’s basically the only innovative thing Microsoft has done in the last oh, 20 years?