What happened in the vegan community?

I hadn’t heard about any of this until seeing that ToS post.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    22 days ago

    The long and short of it is, One of the lemmy.world admins demoted a mod of the vegan community over a comment about how cat can be fed a 100% vegan diet with supplements and the cat will be fine.

    • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      Wtf is happening in the comments. Why are people getting so insane over this topic over and over again? If there’s cat food out there that’s nutritional complete, cats like it, and it happens to be plant based - so what? The only two reasons to object are if someone is 100% convinced such a product doesn’t and cannot exist or if they’re entirely ideological about it. And if we have to apply the naturalistic fallacy that only the natural way can be morally okay, why of all things argue about pet food? I really, really don’t get it why people get so intensely emotional about it.

      • ngwoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        If there’s cat food out there that’s nutritional complete, cats like it, and it happens to be plant based - so what?

        Because the vegan cat food that claims to be nutritionally complete isn’t. Whenever these brands have their products studied they turn out to not be nutritionally complete. Feeding them to a cat is abuse.

        • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 days ago

          So they should simply start producing one that is. Problem solved. No law of nature prevents us from supplementing the right amount of taurine and b12, so there is no reason to be irrational about it.

          • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            20 days ago

            It’s actually more complicated than that. Of the like 6 studies done since the 90s, several found that cats didn’t absorb supplements in the same way, ie with a supplemented diet for taurine they would not find taurine in the cats plasmas after 6 weeks

            And that’s the problem with this whole “but it CAN be done! I’m special!” Attitude. It leads to comments like yours that boil down to “the magic capitalism machine should just make it happen cause of course it’s possible” when the tiny amount of research done found that it’s only questionably possible, and is mostly a shitty idea.

            It’s this pushing shitty ideas because someone feels like a moral superior I’m tired of.

            • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              20 days ago

              Taurine should be the easiest to supplement, since it’s already widely synthesized to supplement traditional pet food with. Three decades old studies really shouldn’t be the only thing we’re looking at before we’re going at each others necks about something.

              It’s this shitting on new ideas because someone feels like a moral superior I’m tired of.

              And ironically this is exactly what vegans are often blamed for btw. People turn off their brain, get all emotional, and feel justified on hating someone for muder, abuse, and torture (all claims from this very comment section) without the slightest bit of nuance. I just searched for “vegan cat food nutrition study” and very randomly picked the first search result, which brought me to a study from 2023 showing that cats fed a vegan diet were overall even healthier. So at the very least we have to agree that this isn’t as clear cut as many here claim with utmost confidence.

              • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                20 days ago

                You found a study where they asked cat owners to self report all the data. As demonstrated in this thread and others, vegans are divorced from reality when it comes to what cats actually need to eat, so I’d say that’s not the most reliable source.

                Additionally:

                “This research and its publication open access was funded by food awareness organisation ProVeg International (https://proveg.com). AK received this award ID: Oct2019-0000000286”

                Riiiiiiiight….

                • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  Then look for a recent study yourself. I certainly won’t waste my time, since I hardly believe you would chance your mind even with the most robust data available. You’ve made up your mind.

                  There’s no reason why supplementation shouldn’t be possible. After all we’re already doing that. Obviously we can test for it (since so many people in this comment claimed that vegan brands were tested and found to be insufficient), so nothing stops us from putting taurine into the cat food to the point where it reaches the required amounts. It’s that simple. If you need to stay offended than for all means keep going. Just know that you behave just like the vegans you’re so annoyed about, and it’s showing.

        • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 days ago

          What should stop a company from supplementing the right amount of all the nutrients listed? The article simply claims it’s not nutritionally complete, but that would only be an argument against the brands currently available and tested, not against the idea in principle.

  • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    22 days ago

    Vegans do a better job of pissing everyone off about a pretty sensible topic than any community I’ve ever seen

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      22 days ago

      their vitriol is…weird. if they just said “i prefer…” not many would be bothered.

      “you’re a murderer.” does tend to ruffle feathers.

      • itsgoodtobeawake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        22 days ago

        Forreal, longtime vegan here… Vegans (online mostly) annoy me more than most people. I swear we aren’t all jerks! I’m probably a major sell out, I don’t even have a problem with hunters.

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          21 days ago

          Honestly as a linux nerd sometimes I feel like us open source folks have a similar problem

          You do a bunch of work and make sacrifices to accomplish living in a way you feel proud of! Wonderful! And then you turn around and antagonize people who don’t invest all their time and energy in the issue that you personally really connect with…! Oh… Wonderful… 🙃

          • Taleya@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            21 days ago

            As someone who’s been working tech for two decades, the more assbaggy the linux user the less they actually know.

      • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        21 days ago

        Almost like ruffling feathers is the point when you truly believe most people are being murderers. You don’t change society by being polite.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          Activism isn’t about being polite as much as effecting change, which vegans are doing the opposite of through much of their online presence.

          Lots of activists change society by passing legislation, organizing political action and peaceful protests.

          Irritating other people with half-baked personal invective won’t get you anywhere productive.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          You don’t change society by making yourself look like a dick and making everyone just want to ignore you either

      • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        21 days ago

        A lot of us are murderers in that way. Or accomplices, whatever. The thing about vegans specifically is that there’s not any moral need for it. The goodness to animals would make you vegetarian. Not having cheese or eggs is not the slightest bit morally better.

        • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Well now I’m wondering if you ever had an actual conversation with a vegan, because they actually have good reasons for this. A vegan diet is simply the most consequential idea if you want to minimize the necessity for animals to die, at the very least (even if we ignore the various ways of exploitation) because male chickens and calves obviously have to be killed in order for these industries to function.

          • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            21 days ago

            I’ve had conversations with vegans, and when one said that honey isn’t vegan because it’s produced by an insect (they said animal, but that’s incorrect), I stopped pretending that (at least some) vegans have any logic to their arguments.

            • Hagdos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              21 days ago

              Wait, why is there no logic in there? Insects are animals, and honey is made by bees, which are insects and thus animals.

              If you believe you shouldn’t use animals for your food production, which is a reasonable definition of veganism, then you shouldn’t eat honey.

              I mean, fine if you do eat honey too, but I don’t really see your point here.

                • Hagdos@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  You might be mixing up vegetarianism and veganism. Vegans also don’t drink milk or eat eggs. You don’t need to kill a cow or a chicken to get either.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              Some vegans feel any animal explotation is wrong, even down to taking the honey the hive created for their colony. Bees are in the animal kingdom, beside plants and fungus category. Also, over harvesting, moving hives to rent out pollinators is creating hive stress and together with nicotine seems to account for a lot of hive collapse/death. We have a growing hive collapse problem, that will end badly for the world if it continues

            • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              But aren’t you the one advocating that this is okay? Why do I need a trigger warning for something so deeply and obviously ethical?

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                20 days ago

                your deeply biased YouTube video is notoriously traumatizing, with the production house that made it providing aftercare tips. viewers report sleeplessness, nightmares, vomiting, lack of appetite and depression.

                you are acting irresponsibly

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                20 days ago

                I don’t have a problem with openheart surgery, but I don’t link videos of it without a tag

                • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 days ago

                  I feel like I’m being trolled right now. It’s a documentary which is expressly about the extensive, systemic animal abuse that happens in the industry, and the first instance of that is over 5 minutes in. Did you not expect gore? Is this not like the most fundamentally obvious thing you could possibly expect from such a documentary?

                  Edit: oh, comment history tells me that I am being trolled. Interesting. Have a nice day.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      21 days ago

      It’s because they don’t actually give a shit about animals, they just want to feel morally superior.

      Same as anyone wanting to ban x, y, or z “for the children”.

      Same as people who want to stop using a perfectly good term because they think it might be offensive to such-and-such group, despite never actually consulting any members of such-and-such group.

      • weastie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        This is an absurd take. Vegans have to sacrifice a lot. I absolutely love animals and it’s insane to me that someone can’t see the amount of torture and murder of animals there is out there.

        I decided to cut out, as much as is reasonably possible, anything that was made by or is these animals. I don’t do this because I want to feel superior, I do it for the animals. Most vegans don’t do this for attention. Just because you see some vegans shouting online doesn’t mean we’re all like that.

  • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    22 days ago

    Based on the post they were spreading misinformation and being really unsightly, calling not vegans things akin to slurs like “meaties” or some shit. I don’t know the full story though.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 days ago

      Vegans have hilarious nicknames, they seem to spend quite a bit of time on it

    • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      Is “meatie” or “carnist” really a slur though? Those seem benign at worst and mildly accurate at best. Who is throwing a fit over that?

      “No no, you have to protect the feelings of “meat eaters” and “carnivores” by using the full word.” ??? Like… why is this the hill people die on?

      I agree that feeding a cat a vegan or vegetarian diet is still animal abuse, though. They’re not omnivores like us. They’re obligate carnivores, and pretending they’re not is abusive.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      They’re still doing it, being That Arsehole in other threads as well. Baity troll either terminally online or fifteen.

  • Blackout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    22 days ago

    Vegan 2.0 was released recently and the attention it received led to a private equity buyout. Vegan® is now a trademark term and you need that ® or it’s in violation. I hear they are about to release a line of fake-vegan® meat for people who want to look vegan but like the taste of cow.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Sometimes I’d like to see civilization collapse just so I can watch the smug ones starve when they refuse to hunt or fish when there’s not enough vegetables to survive on. Not so high and might when survival is on the line, are you, Jerry.

    • Fosheze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      22 days ago

      Not yet. Growing cells in a lab still requires fetal bovine serum which is obviously an animal product. There is work going into replacing it with a synthetic alternative but, to my knowledge, noone has been successful yet.

      • batmaniam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        You seem knowledgeable, is the FBS clonal? Like can it grow more undifferentiated or does it need to be continually harvested?

        • Fosheze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          FBS doesn’t contain cells. It’s a chemical/protein mixture used to grow various cell cultures. On It’s own it doesn’t do anything. It just contains most of the things that growing cells need.

          I actually know very little about it though. Check out The Thought Emporium on youtube if you want a better look at how it is all done. They do all sorts of fun stuff like engineering yeast to produce spider silk, growing neurons and using them for basic computation, making a meat berry, and using a genetically engineered virus to cure their lactose intolerance for a while.

          Edit: Also that youtuber did some testing on replacing FBS and the growth medium with other substances with some sucess. If I remember correctly, they found that for growing regular muscle cells they could replace like 60% of the FBS needed with egg yolk without harming the cells. But that’s still an animal product so it’s still not exactly vegan.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Depends who you ask:

      some would say that it’s vegan as long as no animal has suffered or been deprived for your meal, meaning that lab grown qualifies.

      Others, such as the crazies in the vegan circle jerk community, believe that as long as it’s ever been in the same zip code as a leather belt, it can never be vegan.

      That last one is exaggerated, of course, but nowhere near as much as you’d hope…

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      “a person who does not eat any food derived from animals and who typically does not use other animal products”.

      not by that definition