• 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Imagine watching YouTube. Your kid, spouse, grandparent, whatever falls and gets badly hurt. You pause the video (out of habit, instead of shutting off the TV) to tend to them. You toss the remote as you rush off the couch, the remote is lost. Instead of silence so you can hear whether they’re breathing and be able to hear and talk to the emergency services dispatcher, you hear an unskippable ad. They parish, because the dispatcher couldn’t hear you and get the ambulance truck to your door in time.

    Imagine watching YouTube. You’re alone in your house. You hear something at the window behind you. You pause the video, since it’s probably nothing, to listen more intently. Instead of silence to allow you hear the burglar, you hear an ad for something you would never buy, as the burglar breaks into your house and attacks you for that sweet, sweet PS5. You parish, because you couldn’t react in time.

    Edge cases? Maybe. Possible? Yes. Will YouTube/google be charged with accessory to murder? I highly doubt that.

    Pause ads are a very bad, and very dangerous, idea.

    • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      When I see you perish all I can think of is:

      You are watching TV and hear a noise in a nearby room

      PAUSE TV_

      you pause the TV but to your dismay the TV plays an ad by a political candidate!! The sounds of the shadowy figure are drowned out

      SHUT TV OFF_

      whoops! Unfortunately for you this is a smart TV! And you need your phone to shut it off, it’s in the same room that the noise is coming from

      RUN AWAY

      You hear glass break.

      Unable to pinpoint the location of your adversary, you are caught by surprise and bludgeoned by a steel bar and lay in a pool of your own blood. As your vitality seeps away through the hole in your fractured skull, you wonder the many outcomes that will never come to pass had you had YouTube Premium

      You perish

      START OVER? Y/N

  • li10@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The bastards are cracking down on getting cheap YT premium with a VPN. Now requires a payment method from the region you’re purchasing via :/

    I’ve uninstalled it off the smart TV, started playing videos on laptop. On mobile I use YT via safari with ad blocker, on IOS and not willing to jailbreak or anything like that.

  • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am not a content creator and do not upload anything. My use would just be as a consumer.

    As a consumer, I will not use YT simply because of ads and the way they have made removing ads without a premium subscription so ridiculously difficult and time consuming.

    Imo, having ads thrown in your face when you pause it, is reason enough not to use again.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I experienced this crazy onslaught of advertising to the point of reducing how much I watched YouTube. I was pretty upset and not at all inclined to pay, especially since YouTube was even putting ads on my own videos without me seeing a single cent, because my channel is too small.

    Then my partner bought me a few months of a Premium Subscription as a Christmas gift.

    It was pointed out to me that I watched more YouTube than any other streaming service which I was paying for.

    Combined with background music on mobile, it’s changed my life.

    I’m still unimpressed with the business model, but the alternative is so far worse.

    Find me a self publishing video platform with the reach of YouTube that doesn’t require self hosting and I’ll happily move my content there.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Find me a self publishing video platform with the reach of YouTube that doesn’t require self hosting and I’ll happily move my content there.

      Nebula is the next best thing to YouTube, but not enough content creators have moved their stuff there, so it’s easy to run out of interesting videos to watch after a while. Some of the bigger folks I follow share their content on both platforms, and the incentive to watch on Nebula instead of YouTube is that content creators have more freedom with their videos on Nebula. They can post bonus/extra footage that would be automatically flagged and blocked by YouTube normally. Don’t need to dance around the censors on Nebula.

      Nebula is subscription-based, so they don’t show ads anywhere on their site. But if you don’t want to pay for another subscription service, you can also do a one-time payment to have lifetime access to their site. It’s $300, which is the cost of just over 4 years of their subscription service ($6/mo). Considering I’ve had an account for over 3 years now, it’s almost paid for itself.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The lifetime access option shouldn’t exist for an app like that, not unless they have another primary form of income (usually ads). That type of service costs a lot of money to host and if you have a user base that does a one off purchase you stop having a good chunk of that income relatively fast

        That’s just the main red flag I see from that, I would be super hesient starting on a platform that isn’t self sustaining and doesn’t have a parent company willing to chuck money at it “till it works” like Google did

        • cobysev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think it’s great for a ground-floor investment in a YouTube competitor. It draws more people to the platform, gets a chunk of money flowing up front to help boost the service, and they can always sunset the lifetime option if the site gets popular and revenue starts to get tight. As long as they continue to honor it for everyone who paid initially.

          Like I said in my original comment, a Nebula subscription is only $6/mo. A lifetime access payment is over 4 years of subscriptions up front. That’s a nice chunk of change to help get them established.

          I saw someone’s video about how Nebula works (I think Legal Eagle? He was advertising it hardcore on YouTube for a while) and the subscription service is how they pay content creators. He said it’s a more stable income than YouTube, where your videos earn advertising money based on trends and visibility. If you’re not YouTube famous (and the algorithm doesn’t make you visible), you’re not going to make any money on the platform. But Nebula gives you a more solid income, plus the freedom to make the content you want. No AI moderators flagging videos because it thought it detected the word “suicide” or something. No forcing you to include key words or pushing regular videos on a tight schedule to ensure the algorithm keeps recommending your channel.

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        No offense to nebula (I’m rooting for them) but unless you exclusively watch news and educational content it basically has nothing to offer. I tried it for a year and I ended up barely using it because I don’t watch that type of content.

        • cobysev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, like I said, it needs more content creators to dump their libraries there. It could be a fantastic competitor to YouTube if only more people knew about it and used it.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It was pointed out to me that I watched more YouTube than any other streaming service which I was paying for.

      Yeah, I think that YouTube provides a lot of value.

      My problem is that I don’t really want Google – a company who makes a lot of their money via profiling and data-mining – logging and data-mining everything I watch.

      YouTube Premium lets someone avoid ads. But as best I can tell, it’s not buying any kind of no-log service – in fact, it’s just linking your activity to your financial information, which makes logging and profiling easier. That’s not the service that I want to buy from Google.

      What I’d be willing to get from Google is a “no log” service.

      I pay for Kagi, for search engine service. I pay for commercial email service. I’m fine with giving money to online service providers and entrusting them with (some) of my data…but I want part of that service to be that they aren’t logging what I do and data-mining my data.

      I don’t like the model of “we don’t charge up front but we make our money by extracting all the information about you that we can” model. I’m fine with that existing, because some people are more comfortable with that. But it isn’t what I want for myself.

      • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think that every single provider tracks your activity and the vast majority of them use it to optimise their service income from you, either by giving you better engagement, ie. making you use the service more - endless searching for content for example, or by selling the captured tracking data to the highest bidder.

  • toynbee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not only is this true and annoying, but other things about the ads are getting worse, too.

    I recently had to factory reset my TV and, after the first time I opened the YouTube app, immediately had to find the “don’t play video preview” option. It worked, except for the huge banner ad at the top of the list of videos, which still saw fit to play with deafening sound when I didn’t immediately change the video selection. I can’t find a setting to disable this.

    Also, I’ve noticed the “fewer ads for this long video” message popping up during videos longer than thirty minutes (and now it seems like longer than twenty minutes). Not only is that message condescending like they’re doing me a favor, but I’m pretty sure it’s not true, at least not by much; and the ads are definitely longer and mostly unskippable.

    Like someone else says in this thread, it feels like extortion.

    • Retiring@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Try this, if your TV can run it: https://smarttubeapp.github.io/ No ads, and there is even sponsor block included, so you don’t have to hear the annoying „segue to our sponsor“ and „please like and subscribe“ nonsense.

  • dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I also noticed that they started showing ads upon opening YouTube on Android TV.

    Google sucks so bad.

  • xploit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Tubular fork of newpipe works on AndroidTV, don’t know if newpipe itself does but last time I checked it didn’t. So I use it on both tv and phone.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I have rabbit ears hooked into my Plex server so I can record the few shows left on linear broadcast tv

  • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m going to show this real quick and then we’re going to move on, so pause the video if you want to take a closer look…

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Phone: rings
      Me: “better pause Youtube so that I can answer without noise in the background”
      Youtube: plays ad with even louder audio
      Me:

      • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Better switch to some horror film murder compilation video before answering the phone. At least I know it’s going to be all screams and blood splattering on the walls while I’m talking on the phone.

  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    A bit of a PSA for LG owners running webOS:

    https://www.webosbrew.org/

    I rooted my tv and now have adless youtube, but apparently root is not a prerequisite - there also installation using dev mode. Admitedly, haven’t tried it and it’s probably less convenient to get it set up, but then it should be a one time thing.

    • Zadhu@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve got an LG C1 and have been using homebrew with Dev mode for a while now.

      Can confirm it is very easy to do if you have a basic tech knowledge base.

      The only inconvenience is sometimes after updates it will delete the homebrew apps but its a 5 minute job to get them back and ive only had it happen probably 3 times over a year.

      “Youtube no ads” - the homebrew app, works flawlessly as if it were the original app with all of your subs etc but every now and then a tiny banner comes up begging me to subscribe to premium which I actually love because I can keep telling them to fuck off. The frequency of the little banner is probably once every few times you open the app and its non-intrusive.

      Overall the LG dev mode trick with the Youtube No Ads app has been the cleanest and most enjoyable out of the box experience compared to alternative frontends etc.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s funny because I only hear about ads now from you guys. I never see them myself.

    Using freetube on a Linux media player connected to my TV and Newpipe on the phone.

    • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      How did you get newpipe to work? It’s been broken for me for like the past 3 weeks.

      • TeutonenThrasher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Latest NewPipe 0.27.2 installed from F-Droid is able to play videos for me. But you might also try PipePipe or Tubular, which I mostly use these days.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It was broken for a day but there was an update on f Droid. Just installed that and it’s been fine.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    They’ve even started having “next” instead of “skip” so it just goes to another ad. But the worst is when it gives you an unstoppable 90 second ad roll, comes back to the video for all of 2 seconds and starts yet another 90 second ad roll.

    If I want to watch YouTube on the bigger screen now, I just open it in Firefox on my VR headset.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve had it return from ads, make the video playback stutter. I refresh/reload or whatever, jump back in, get more ads, video playback stutter. It’s annoying as fuck

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I have that issue when watching on Firefox (no matter the device). Always have to reload the video to get the frame rate back in sync otherwise it looks like it’s playing at sub 24fps making even a live action video look like the Spider-Verse movie animation.

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh, this is on android yt app.
          Pixel 8pro, so Google & Google.
          There isn’t any variable that they don’t have control of.
          Video playback after ads skips 500ms, plays 500ms, skips 500ms etc. Changing quality doesn’t fixing it. Play/pause doesn’t fix it, skipping doesn’t fix it. I have to fully quit YT app and restart it to get playback again, and chances are it starts the ads again.
          Never had an issue on FF, w10 or Linux.

          I get that streaming video is expensive for bandwidth. And creators need an incentive to create.
          I don’t expect it for free. I don’t YT enough to warrant a premium subscription.
          The ads literally break the platform for me.
          Makes sense to me to get into one of the alternative clients… But I don’t want to not pay my dues… It’s just not worth the £13 a month: there is no way I’m consuming that much content.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This presents a good demonstration of what we can expect Alphabet / Google / Youtube to do if ever it should win its war on adblockers, or convince people to watch YouTube without vetting. Any time it promises to compromise and make a tolerable user experience, it will ratchet up advertisement plugs until it becomes intolerable.

    This is why we can’t relent, ever.

  • tracer_ca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I just pay for YouTube premium family. We all get add free YouTube. Plus music which we all use. It’s a great value and no hastle. More money goes to creators this way as well.

    • explodes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is the right answer. If more people subscribed… Well, it wouldn’t have to be this way.