• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Nintendo sues OpenAI after determining it infringes on its patent (JP2002-905518) for a “dystopian AI assistant” used in Metroid Fusion.

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      They already do that. I think it was Did You Know Gaming channel’s video about Pókemon ROM hacks and they mentioned that few of them were likely taken down because they were targeted by an AI crawler.

    • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Oh, If love it if their lawyers tore a big strip out of Open AI (not that OpenAI need any help operating their massive money furnace.)

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s cool now could you tell your lawyers to go in a different direction with respect to mods and fan games?

    • Xanis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Pokemon effectively makes them all the money they need and all they need to do is sick one of the rabid lawyers they keep in the basement on anyone even remotely infringing upon what they think they own.

      They’re like a litigation equivalent to McDonald’s land ownership twist to company financial equivalency.

    • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nintendo militantly protecting their IP, to the detriment of pirates, is their prerogative. Inside the dev culture, they’re one of the best and most respected AAA shops in the business. Their games speak for themselves.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean morally good, if Disney didn’t suck total dogshit now, I’d call Nintendo the Disney of Gaming

  • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s too early. In 10 years Nintendo will, it’s the Nintendo rhythm.

    You don’t have to shove AI into everything but it allows for a lot of amazing and crazy things. Gameplay first and I don’t think we need AI for this, but a lot of side elements can be handled by AI. Be it sounds, dialogues, voices, randomness in monster or level design etc. In general, AI could be good with filling games with content without it being generic. It will help to elevate content past obviously identifiable “random” content. Same way an AI image doesn’t look AI if it’s well made. However, we’ll get a lot of shovelware stuff of lazy companies, no one needs those.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I mean, look at No Man’s Sky. It’s not Ai but some algorithm creating the world and it looks really generic and the same everywhere.

      I hope using AI can make worlds like that feel actually different.

      • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah that semi randomness of NMS is what I had in mind. AI could improve that a lot.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is already a lot of work in generative game design that doesn’t involve AI, including a lot of procedurally generated items. There is also a lot of bad generated designs as the inputs allowed to be changed are not sufficient enough to create enough variance.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I know it was funky in its initial release, but I miss when openAI had free api access so a bunch of games temporarily had chat with NPCs. It was really cool.

      Spacebourne 2 had an AI ship computer you could ask questions or whatever. Craftopia had all NPCs and monsters with chat capabilities which was kinda hilarious because a goblin that’s attacking you would tell you it’s peaceful and would never hurt anyone lol

      It’s one thing I’ve wanted forever to be in a video game, the ability to communicate what I want to communicate and to get dynamic responses, not just some dialogue wheel or whatever

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The different direction;

    No more original IP, and 99% of profits come from litigating against end users.

    (It’s the same direction as before, just not including AI yet)

  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good for them. I’d love to see ALL industries do this but that’s going to be impossible. We’d need greed eradicated before that happens.

  • Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Nintendo noticed ai exists just now and thus dodged the hype cycle

  • roteradler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Nintendo can’t even do games on a technical standard higher than 2012, how should they use AI? And their hardware is way to weak as well BTW.

    They’re just lucky that the current AI Models are crap, otherwise this would be the next standard they’re missing in their “more of the same since 1980” games.

    They should use more energy and money for developing innovative games than suing every fart on the planet.