By Jeremy Hsu on September 24, 2024


Popular smart TV models made by Samsung and LG can take multiple snapshots of what you are watching every second – even when they are being used as external displays for your laptop or video game console.

Smart TV manufacturers use these frequent screenshots, as well as audio recordings, in their automatic content recognition systems, which track viewing habits in order to target people with specific advertising. But researchers showed this tracking by some of the world’s most popular smart TV brands – Samsung TVs can take screenshots every 500 milliseconds and LG TVs every 10 milliseconds – can occur when people least expect it.

“When a user connects their laptop via HDMI just to browse stuff on their laptop on a bigger screen by using the TV as a ‘dumb’ display, they are unsuspecting of their activity being screenshotted,” says Yash Vekaria at the University of California, Davis. Samsung and LG did not respond to a request for comment.

Vekaria and his colleagues connected smart TVs from Samsung and LG to their own computer server. Their server, which was equipped with software for analysing network traffic, acted as a middleman to see what visual snapshots or audio data the TVs were uploading.

They found the smart TVs did not appear to upload any screenshots or audio data when streaming from Netflix or other third-party apps, mirroring YouTube content streamed on a separate phone or laptop or when sitting idle. But the smart TVs did upload snapshots when showing broadcasts from the TV antenna or content from an HDMI-connected device.

The researchers also discovered country-specific differences when users streamed the free ad-supported TV channel provided by Samsung or LG platforms. Such user activities were uploaded when the TV was operating in the US but not in the UK.

By recording user activity even when it’s coming from connected laptops, smart TVs might capture sensitive data, says Vekaria. For example, it might record if people are browsing for baby products or other personal items.

Customers can opt out of such tracking for Samsung and LG TVs. But the process requires customers to either enable or disable between six and 11 different options in the TV settings.

“This is the sort of privacy-intrusive technology that should require people to opt into sharing their data with clear language explaining exactly what they’re agreeing to, not baked into initial setup agreements that people tend to speed through,” says Thorin Klosowski at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital privacy non-profit based in California.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2449198-smart-tvs-take-snapshots-of-what-you-watch-multiple-times-per-second/ (paywall!!)

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The only sensible way to operate these TVs is with no internet connection. We run our entertainment through an AppleTV. If that ever starts showing ads at rest, I’ll replace it with a Mac mini or a NUC. Fuck these companies and their race to the bottom.

    • woodenskewer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Buy a commercial TV. It’s a plain jane TV. I put one in as a SCADA, but it’s just a tv with no frills. When I saw what it was, I knew when I’d need to purchase a tv this would be the type I wanted.

    • Blxter@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would love to able to able to put a different OS that does nothing but what I actually tell it to so on my smart TV…

    • ConsistentAlgae@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes there is, believe it or not. It just depends on the kind of TV you have.

      I setup my LG to be “jailbroken” so I could have it inject a python script into a PS4 to mod that.

      https://youtu.be/zYoesrUsIj8?feature=shared

      Interesting stuff.

      The other option is to setup a PiHole and find the telemetry they are using to send the info off and blocking that.

  • Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Something doesn’t add up. How can a TV take 100 Screenshots of 4k content per second? No wifi has that bandwidth. No embedded processor has that capacity.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      360p is probably enough. And that’s “up to” per second, average is probably far far far less.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It doesn’t need a 4K screenshot. It needs enough data/metrics from any given single frame to run it through analytics and an algorithm to tailor ads. Backend surveillance like this isn’t interested in fidelity to the human viewing experience. It needs identifying data. That can be had through a combination of low quality data scrapes done numerous times.

      “Screenshot” is more like a metaphor here. Sort of like how your Apple or Google photos are “private,” but the data and analytics taken from them you’ve given away. It’s like if you told me I could look at all the photos on your phone and take as many notes and subject them to as much analysis as I wanted, but I promised not to actually physically keep your phone/photos. Probably makes you feel like your photos are securely still in your possession, but I got what I wanted. Your data is technically private, but my data about your data is mine.

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m the OP, but not the author of this article posted.

        After I dove deep into the study, the study said it records data at 500ms. And then it batches the data together, and only sent data once per minute back to Samsung. Between 8kB and 9kB of data per minute. So definitely not 4K screenshots.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      1. it doesn’t necessarily take full resolution images

      2. just because it can capture images a few hundred milliseconds apart doesn’t mean it’s continuously capturing images. It could be several in short bursts with a delay between groups of images.

      • flappy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You know when people say “I’ve only talked about this once, never searched for it, and then I got ads a few days later”?

        What if it hasn’t been phones that were listening (despite Siri/Google Assistant/Alexa mis-identifying something as a wake-word being the most sensible explanation), but TVs?

    • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not mentioning taking 100 screenshots each second with what - 25 frames per second? - is kinda overkill…

    • travysh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’m pretty familiar with how one particular brand of TV works, and you’re right, it’s absolutely not screenshots. It’s a handful of single pixels across the screen. By matching these pixels against known content it’s possible to identify what was being watched. Not too different than how Shazam can identify a song.

      That’s not to say all TV manufacturers work that way.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It doesn’t say the screenshot must be full resolution and it doesn’t say the screenshot is immediately uploaded. A couple seconds to downscale and compress would work the same as far as content identification is concerned

  • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    “When a user connects their laptop via HDMI just to browse stuff on their laptop on a bigger screen by using the TV as a ‘dumb’ display, they are unsuspecting of their activity being screenshotted,”

    But if you never connected the TV to the internet, it’s not able to upload anything right?

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Friendly reminder that gaming console monitors, computer monitors, projectors, dumb TVs, and commercial displays exist.

    Yes, I could hack a smart TV to disable its networking capabilities. (Merely withholding my wifi password is not reliable.) But that would still be showing the manufacturers that I find spyware TVs acceptable, and supporting the production of those models.

    Also, this would be a good time to pressure our legislators into criminalizing this nonsense.

    • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why is withholding the WiFi password not enough? Could they somehow piggyback off a different device or something?

      • tmcgh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve heard that some of them will connect to any wifi available. So if your neighbor does not have a password on their network. The tv will connect and upload the data.

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    this is why you get a separate apple tv/android box and not connect your tv to the internet

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        anythings capable of it, but the companies behind the (premium) boxes have less of an incentive. While theyre all capable, its a matter if you have trust in them. At least for the Shield TV for example, go download a shield tv rom if you really don’t trust Nvidia. If you are paranoid that they all can do it, than any smart device can do it because its connected to the internet.

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Again, Samsung and LG is sniffing the HDMI port… So especially if you use another device like an Apple TV or Android or HTPC running Linux, only then Samsung & LG will record this data and sent back to HQ.

        • parpol@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you use a PC, there is no need to connect the TV to your WiFi, which means it won’t send any data.

          • melroy@kbin.melroy.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Correct. Assuming your TV doesn’t connect to open wifi access points.

            And assuming you never want to use any of the smart features or apps.

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    So what do we do when smart TVs force us to connect to the Internet, and refuse to work until we do?

    This is exhausting. We’re speeding towards a horrible, privacy-less future.

  • InternetPerson@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    For example, it might record if people are browsing for baby products or other personal items.

    Don’t mind baby products and dildos or whatever.

    They could see bank activity and even login credentials when someone is temporarily displaying their own passwords.

    This basically ignores all security measures regarding everything. Sensitive communication, company secrets and so on.

    That’s fucking seriously huge. What the fuck?!

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well there are no non smart TVs anymore as far as I can tell, except the “monitor” version of TVs for 30% more money and maybe some antique 32" TVs with resolution of 1366x768

  • dumbass@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Hahah my friends made fun of me for buying some cheap as fuck “smart” TV instead of an expensive LG one like them, my TV can barely run a web browser, no chance in hell that things spying on me.

    • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe it can barely run a web browser because it’s working so hard spying on you?

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Exactly. Since this comment doesn’t make sense. It’s most likely not only Samsung and LG doing it