• Fermion@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    Step 1: clean out the lint from the charging port

    Step 2: make sure you actually got all the lint out and there isn’t any hiding to the side.

    The sim ejector pin that used to come with phones can sometimes just barely fit between the center blade and connector housing. Otherwise a paperclip with a slight hook bent into the end can work well. Flosspicks work well to dig out the lint.

    Also consider getting a wireless charger for nightly charging if your phone supports it.

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      26 days ago

      I prefer a toothpick. Wood won’t scratch the metal or cause a short, but it’s still stiff enough to scrape any lint that’s stuck. And lint sticks a bit to the toothpick, so that helps get it out.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Wireless charging WILL wear out your battery faster.

      For longevity, use a slow wired charger. This will put the least thermal strain on the battery.

      • Wolf314159@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        How exactly?

        Also, my phone charges slower with a wireless charger.

        Lots of hand wavy theories and generalizations in the answers below, some of them sound very convincing. None of them actually cite any sources or backup those theories with data.

        Here’s my own acedotal experience. I’ve put my phone down on a seemingly well designed wireless charging pad every night for almost 4 years and this phones battery has shown zero sign of deterioration that I can see. This is the first phone I’ve ever owned with wireless charging and also the first with a battery that hasn’t given up the ghost in 2 years or less. The same pad also charges my smart watch every night, which doesn’t even have any other option for charging.

        Next they’ll be telling you to avoid using cruise control on the highway because it will wear out the transmission. Use your phone as it was designed to be used and stop worrying.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          The problem is heat, not charging speed. A wired charger heats the phone less than a wireless charger, and a slow charger heats it less than a fast one.

          It’s not like wireless charging will literally destroy your battery instantly, but it WILL do so faster than wired charging at the same speed.

          You could offset the heat by charging even slower via wireless (easy with something that has a small battery to begin with, like a watch) but no matter what method is used, the one that runs the battery the coolest WILL last the longest, whether the difference is just one year out five, more, or less.

    • Draces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      I ended up having to use an actual sewing needle since the lint was compacted and the ejector pin was too wide

    • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      A comment like this one saved me from giving up on my aging phone.

      No matter how convinced you are you definitely cleaned it, there still could be a little bit more stuck in there.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      Everyone raves about usb-c but despite my hating everything Apple, the lightning port’s physical design is so much better.

      Who thought putting a thin circuit board projection inside the port was a good idea?

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          26 days ago

          That’s the signal interface like the number of pins and active termination circuitry.

          Physically there’s no reason for USB c to have a male nub inside a larger female jack and the reverse for the male end. It makes it more fragile and harder to keep clean.