• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s finally time to hold the people hiding behind the companies accountable!!

    woohoo!

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Do it. The crimes are almost entirely by him personally, and had unprecedented damage. He should be responsible with all his money - a Twitter-sized blow would be a slap on the wrist as the platform is worth just $5B or thereabouts.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    fine the fucker for 20% of his net “worth”, that should give him some pause

  • Skvlp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    It’s easy to support when Elon is the recipient, but is this a good precedent to set?

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Shipping companies setup separate LLC’s for their ships so of they have an accident the ship goes bankrupt and they keep their profits shielded… that kind of stuff is bullshit

      • tekato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yes. Like every system, there are those who abuse it. But you must be careful so that while trying to punish those abusers, you don’t end up creating avenues to also punish those who don’t abuse the system, but simply make a mistake. This sets a precedent so that the government can target the assets of the owner of the company if they’re not satisfied the company punishment, which doesn’t sound as cool when the company in question is your family’s bakery or your neighbor’s paralegal office.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I don’t know if this will be a big issue for small businesses. But in any case where there is construction of multiple companies in a structure to separate profits and losses for fuckery with taxes and fines, I think I would also be OK with that whole structure being seen as one entity and treated as such.

          The billionaire class however is uniquely adept at this kind of fuckery and wield an ungodly level of power, only surpassed by governments. And I think governments need to be careful that these assholes don’t get too much power… so it’s high time they take them down a peg… or 10.

          • tekato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            It will be an issue because your average citizen won’t be so willing to start a new business if they know the government can come after their personal funds as a consequence of something that was done at the company level.

    • toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Why not? Which person owning multiple companies would be disadvantaged in a way that could be considered unfair in this way?

    • GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Unironically, yes. You shouldn’t be able to shield your actions under a different corporate umbrella.

      “Oh, guess we can’t fine them much because Twitter is a money pit, so they’ll get to continue breaking the law for cheap”

      Nah, make the fine off of his entire net worth, make him cash in some of that stock so he can finally pay taxes and fines. Make it hurt enough for him to consider not breaking the laws of countries he wants to do business in.

      • tekato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Sounds good in principle, but isn’t the one of the main purposes of creating an LLC or Corporation to shield your personal assets from the company’s finances? Everyone cheers for these policies until you’re the one they’re coming for. I hope you’re as cheerful when the government wipes your personal bank account as consequence of your company’s affairs.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          LLCs shouldn’t exist in the first place.

          A companys owner should always be liable for the laws its company breaks.