A lot of the things we do on a daily or weekly basis have ways of doing them that can either be private or communal, some of these which we do not think to consider as having that characteristic.

For example, bathing in the Roman Empire used to be communal, but then Rome fell and citizens in the splinter countries began taking baths privately.

Receiving mail is another example. There are countries which don’t have mailboxes and everyone gets their mail at the post office in the PO boxes. It was the United States which pioneered the idea of the modern mail system, which is why we associate it as a private act.

There are activities as well which don’t have any history as jumping between one or the other that might benefit from it, for example I think towns might benefit if internet was free and freely accessible but only at the local library.

What’s a non-communal aspect of life you think should be communal?

  • jerkface@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    We should be using neighbourhood food co-ops to purchase and distribute food from farmers and wholesalers rather than from retailers.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    … Why should private internet be banned or discouraged? What benefits would that being?

    It’s a bit of a cop out, but maybe talking about and dealing with feelings. At best people usually only talk privately with a professional for money. Normalise just having regular group therapy for everyone that they can just drop in and out of.

    Or if we want to really push boundaries: Orgies and kink parties. Sex is a natural part of life, no need to keep it secret.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m not sure that something like a public orgy would be a good idea, not because of “morals” (I tend to think modern society is far too repressed about sexual stuff), but because of the health implications that would come of encouraging sexual contact between large groups of strangers. That sounds like a recipe for STI spread unless you were very strict and thorough with testing, vetting participants, and enforcing protective measures, which inevitably not every instance would be.

      • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        However, if talking and partaking in sexual acts is less stigmatised, people will hopefully feel a lot more comfortable about getting tested and talking about it.

        And honestly, if it does turn out to be that big a problem, vetting and requiring regular testing seems a reasonable thing to require before people are allowed in.

  • Oka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Clothes being optional

    Im not saying we should be nude all the time. Clothes have their purpose.I think we should have the option to be nude in public, without making it sexual

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Most places in the US legally allow nudity, with the main barrier being people calling the police and making a big deal out of doing something legal.

      • Oka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        In my area, you can be nude on private property as long as a neighbor has to make an effort to see you. My back yard allows it.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I never feel inconvenienced by having to wear clothing. I suppose part of that is because as a man, I can go shirtless without getting stares and I wouldn’t want to be without underwear (for support) even if I were on a deserted island. I wonder what the circumstances you have in mind are in which you would like to have the option of being nude in public.

      Edit: Now that I think about it, there have been a few times when I wanted to go swimming and just swimming in my underwear wasn’t an option because I would have to walk while wearing it later and that would be uncomfortable.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Generally think private homes are a giant waste, both in terms of wasted physical space and energy lost due to poor insulation.

    Living should be communal. No residential construction should hold less than eight housing units.

    After you do this, you can consolidate a bunch of an amenities - washing machines, parking, central heating/AC, pools, gardens, outdoor grills, wet and dry bars, basements, rumpace rooms, home theaters.

    It all gets so much nicer when it’s a communal living space.

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      washing machines, parking, central heating/AC, pools, gardens, outdoor grills, wet and dry bars, basements, rumpace rooms, home theaters.

      Aw hell naw. Tell me you’ve never been poor enough to have to use a shared washing machine or even a laundromat without telling me you never had to. Those things are absolutely disgusting.

      I used to believe in dense housing in cities until I had two sets of psycho upstairs neighbours and no thanks, I want to be as far away from another human being as reasonably feasible at all times, nevermind not share a fucking pool with one.

    • funkajunk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s a nice idea, but how do we decide on who gets to live in the communal space?