• UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Assuming you begin investing at the age of 20 and invest $554 per month for 45 years at a 6% growth rate, you would yield 1.4 million. Definitely not MILLIONS.

    • Thorry84@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      And then you add the inflation and you actually just owe money. Got to get that third job at 65

  • Flamekebab@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m actually looking to move from owning to leasing a car because it’s been false economy. The maintenance costs and stress have been so high as to make it cheaper to pay a few hundred quid each month.

      • Flamekebab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Not inherently. I have the option of having the lease company handle insurance, but it’s much more cost effective not to.

  • Goun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Sorry, the best “for you and your future”?? OUR future

  • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    In this land of legalised extortion in the form of insurance my friend who is in his mid 30s and been driving over a decade with no claims has to pay £700 per month.

    My mum wanted to add my sister (again mid thirties and driving for nearly 20 years now with no claims) to her policy so she could borrow her car for a week and then maybe use the car once a month if that and they wanted an additional £1000 a month for the privaledge.

    Fucking scum.

    • marble@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Per month?! Wtf are you driving? (Late 40s here, paying around £400 per year for my electric mini insurance)

      • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        My bad, i wrote per month but i meant per year, that was my mistake. He is driving a 1.4 turbo new shape VW Scirocco (sp). My mothers car is a 1.3 Citroen C3 so hardly expensive, luxury or even quick cars. Even £400 is disgustingly over priced in my opinion though, the way this country does insurance is vile.

        Australia’s system of buying registration which then covers your basic insurance (third party cover) which is like a tax and insurance cost combined for the car is much more logical, then if you want to you can buy additional fully comp cover for the car none of this insuring per driver per car bullshit.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Car insurance is expensive because cars are both risky and highly destructive. Hence, making a market for them involves high prices.

      Regardless of what you think of insurance companies, there’s just no way around this - you could nationalize car insurance and it would still either be really expensive, either on the policy level or else born by taxes.

        • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          They’re not, they’re complaining about the problems inherent to cars.

          • ysjet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Which is ignoring the problems inherant to auto insurance, which is fundamentally a greater force in the price/cost of car insurance than the danger of cars.

            Yes, cars can be dangerous, but that’s not why car insurance is expensive, it’s expensive because car insurance companies have a completely captive market in the US- one that must pay whatever the insurance comapny dictates.

            As a result, they set the price as high as they can get away with, and then refuse to actually pay it out anyway.

            Don’t make excuses for the insurance companies. The risk is the whole point, and certainly does not excuse their gouging.

            You’ll notice other countries do not, in fact, have to deal with this level of price gouging, which implies it’s nothing to do with the cars themselves- it’s just the insurance companies, and it always has been.

            • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              The risk is the whole point, and certainly does not excuse their gouging.

              The risk is the point though. High risk activities will cost more to insure because they’ll need to be paid out more often. Couple that with the high destruction possible, and you have frequent accidents that can all cause very expensive damage, necessitating a high base price for insurance.

              The price gouging is just capitalism, and I doubt anyone here is going to argue that capitalism isn’t bad.

      • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’m not trying to argue against the fact that they are both risky and highly destructive, it is definitely necessary. My issue is more with the way that it works in the UK. I think the system in somewhere like Australia is a lot fairer and isnt inherently designed to bleed people of the maximum amount of money like it is in the UK.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      yeah of fucking course. you guys are forced to buy insurance in the US, they have a big juicy captive market.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Insurance varies a lot with what you drive, where, amount of coverage, and history of driving.

    Mine is around $800/year and I drive nothing to brag about. (Well, except cost of ownership and safety record. Knock on wood). But my partner pays more because they have more coverage and a newer car worth covering.

    But if you think $350/month is high, let me introduce you to private health insurance. 😂

  • ddplf@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Oh come on, Lemmy. I know I’m on c/fuckcars; but seriously - $600 a month for a new car sounds really good to me, I’m from Eastern Europe.

    It’s good because new cars are significantly more reliable, fuel efficient, safe and comfortable than 10+ year old cars. If you drive a lot and can’t afford to pay $15k up front for a decent ~6yo car, then it’s really not that bad. Much better than buying $600 rolling wreckage, I can tell you that much.

    Yes people, I know you only use bikes and trains and whatnot. But some people neee cars, and you have to respect that. Or are you gonna tell this mother of 2, living in a village, working from office 20km from home, that she would be better off just sticking to the public transport which visits her place once every 2 hours.

    • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This is for insurance, not the cost of buying the car. Yes some people do need cars because of their situation and the majority of people here can recognise that but to pay so much just for fucking insurance!

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If this is just insurance then it is straight up wrong. The national average is like $200/m.

        • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          As I said in another reply I wasn’t mistaken and referring to the post title which was talking about insurance where as the image itself was referring to “car repayments”. That was my mistake.

      • ddplf@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Oh, that’s odd, I don’t get it. It says average car payment per month, I thought it means it’s the monthly loan payment, which is super fine.

        $550 is about what I pay ANNUALLY for AC for my 2015 Mondeo.

        But yeah, it would be close to $3000 annually if I wanted to lease any new vehicle.

        • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Ah OK, I see what you mean. I thought you were referencing the title of the post as it mentions that his neighbour is paying x amount per month for insurance but you are right the image accompanying the post does say average car payment which would referring to paying for the actual car.

          We were both concentrating on different parts of the post! You were right if referring to the image text, sorry.

    • idefix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I don’t get your comment. You can have a decent car new at 400€/month and I still think that’s ridiculously high.

      Used cars make so much more sense when you value rational arguments. (Or bikes, public transportation, feet).

    • apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      Yes people, I know you only use bikes and trains and whatnot. But some people neee cars, and you have to respect that. Or are you gonna tell this mother of 2, living in a village, working from office 20km from home, that she would be better off just sticking to the public transport which visits her place once every 2 hours.

      The point of this movement isn’t to simply ban cars like that will somehow solve all of life’s problems. Some people use bikes and trains not just because they can, but because they have to.

      Cars are a symptom of a pattern of development that makes us disconnected, both from each other and from our needs. It isn’t right that you should have to work 20km from home where the only option you have is to spend monthly payments on a car loan, insurance and gas. You should have the option to work from home, or closer to home, or within reach of easily accessible and usable public transit.

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I thought the same. Also it’s much higher for young males under age 25. Tbf testosterone is a bitch and that demographic causes a lot of the most extreme preventable accidents.

      Which ironically encourages people to ride bikes! If only that were not nearly a suicidal activity in the USA in so many places… 😢

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      No kidding, I pay less than $100 month to insure 2 cars with State Farm. I’ve never had an issue with them paying a claim, and my agent meets with me every few years to go over my options and every single time I walk away with better coverage and less payment.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    some people care DEEPLY about what kind of car everyone drives. that’s literally why overpriced cars even exist

    • dwindling7373@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      As a bike rider, doesn’t that skew even more the relative advantage you get by not giving a fuck? If nobody wants a “weak” car, they should be even cheaper than in a sane market that values cars by their ability to go fast and accurately from A to B, no?

      • zecg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        No, because they pay out the nose for huge SUVs these days which increases the chance they’ll kill us cyclists.

        • dwindling7373@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          No I meant coming from ignorance, since I am a biker, but on the matter of buying “ugly” cars.