• bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Primary reason I don’t understand the call for “drill baby drill”. We’ll end up with oil and needing to sell it for much cheaper than anticipated because the demand is low.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Big manufacturing stands to benefit from this too.

      Lubrication and grease is a big fucking industry. Everyone needs it, from automobiles to machines binding beds together to bridges and, hell, everything, EV’s even. The cheaper oil is, the cheaper that gets, and I know I’d love to walk away from a $35 oil change.

  • ytsedude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I would love for this to happen, but it just seems to be another reason why Trump wants tariffs on foreign EVs–both Elon and the oil/car execs don’t want clean, affordable vehicles! They only want us buying gas-guzzling tanks or deregulated, overpriced Teslas.

    • microphone900@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      It’s like they didn’t learn a goddamn thing from the 70s and the better, cheaper, more fuel efficient cars imported from Japan.

    • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      You do know we already have 100% EV tariffs from Biden, right? I don’t think Trump even needs to extend them, but I could be wrong.

  • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    China’s sales of electric vehicles and hybrids have in fact reached a tipping point. They’ve accounted for more than half of retail passenger vehicle sales

    If you have cheap electricity and cheap batteries, people will buy EVs. Colour me surprised.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Not if the batteries are cheap. I dont want a car whose batteries die after 1 year.

      Give me good batteries

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    That’s very good for them. I’d also like to see them going less dependent on energy for production facilities they import from like Kazakhstan where they just burn coal. As the world’s first, leading factory, they are able to set the trend for everyone else.

  • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    What’s with the title?! Here’s my alternative: China’s EV boom makes a dent in fossil fuel consumption.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Do you know what the word “threatens” means?

      You obviously don’t know how fast China’s been manufacturing cheap EV’s and solar panels. There’s a reason oil lobby owned politicians are trying to ban them from being imported.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      The biggest threat China presents to fossil fuel consumption is future economic growth. Putting 1.4B people into ICE personal vehicles would be a nightmare.

      Their battery tech is going to spare the globe generations of future consumption. They’re doing what Americans should have done 20 years ago, taking ICE engines off the market before they’re built.

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Those OPEC Countries, who rely on ICE Engines like they’re a future ATM Machine, are just maddening. They’re a HIV Virus plague on the world and NASA Administration need to launch them into LEO orbit.

    • Landsharkgun@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      It’s Bloomberg. A rag for capitalists, by capitalists. Less fossil fuel use is bad for them because it hurts their portfolio.

      • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        Uyghur Genocide

        Violating the sovereignty of Taiwan

        Unprovoked attacks on boats in nearby international waters

        Lying about being communist.

        Which of these are made up?

        • 1371113@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          It’s a while ago but you missed one of their earlier genocides, that is still ongoing, in Tibet.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Uyghur Genocide

          Point to the community in Xinjiang that looks like Gaza City

          Violating the sovereignty of Taiwan

          Imagine China encircling Puerto Rico with its navy, then complaining about the US violating its sovereignty.

          Taiwan has been contested territory for centuries. The US attempting to colonize it doesn’t reflect poorly on China.

          Lying about being communist.

          Americans can’t decide if China is bad because Communist or bad because Not Communist Enough.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    It’s a nice graph, but it’s only a projection and I’ve seen those go to shit before.

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Ah yes, the graph shows the demand of gas increasing from 2022 to 2024 despite EV’s becoming exceptionally cheap there in the last couple years, therefore the demand for gas will completely crash in the next couple of years, great projection.