• otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even worse is captions saying what happens. Like it’ll be a video of a baby trying to sit on a chair and missing and falling…and the caption will say “bro missed his chair”.

    Why does a 7 second video need spoilers?

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s up there with the overlay of the “creator” pointing at the spoiler text, needlessly obscuring the actual content.

    • FireWire400@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s the attention span shrinking as time goes by.

      I have a brilliant idea actually; a video sharing site with a maximum video length of one second. “How much can you fit in a second? Find out for only $10/month”

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That just made me miss Vine and early Twitter… Attention span be damned, there’s an art to crafting a good joke with a length constraint that I don’t see much on the internet anymore

  • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I did X and this happened!

    Also, if the title of a news article is in the form of a question I just mutter to myself “no” and keep scrolling without even reading it.

  • LostXOR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    Especially when the video is only 15 seconds long. Has the average attention span really fallen so far that one can’t wait like 10 seconds for the funny part? (The answer is yes, I know, I’ve seen kids scrolling through TikTok and skipping a video after just a second or two).

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Have you ever considered that those kids already saw the video and don’t want to watch again?

  • Schwim Dandy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    I appreciate the warning as it readily admits the majority of the content is boring enough to make you want to scroll away.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yup! That’s in fact what I myself don’t do.

      I cross posted this post from another to MildlyInfuriating because it’s the kind of content this community is for. Not because I myself was soliciting advice.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nah, I like to close my eyes at the penultimate second of any video I would otherwise have watched to the end. Just to be difficult.

  • scops@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Is this some New Social Media platform problem I’m too elder millenial to understand?

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s like the TikTok equivalent of YouTube clickbait titles and thumbnails. I don’t even use TikTok, but I can hear the stilted AI lady voiceover saying, “Wait Until The End. You Won’t Believe The Transformation.”

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Longer engagement times on videos are rewarded with higher priority in the Feed and more advertising revenues.

    These videos are responding to the economic incentives created by the social media industry. Nothing you - personally - do will change this because you - personally aren’t the target audience.