• MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Russia is going to run out of troops.

    IDK when, but they’re basically feeding their population into a meat grinder trying to take Ukraine.

    That’s not too say the Ukraine isn’t taking losses… I’ve just, seen some numbers that indicate that Russia is going to run out of people to send to their deaths before Ukraine will.

    Putin needs to give this up before he doesn’t have a military anymore.

    • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      To be clear: The Russia’s losses are increasing month after month, but their recruitment capacity is not. They are recruiting about 1000 soldiers every day, maybe a bit less. And the number seems to be going down, not growing. They are losing 1300 to 1800 each day now meaning a net loss of something like 400 to 900 soldiers per day!

      They won’t run out of population anytime soon, but they will run out of soldiers.

        • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yup. And that means the Russia will be losing huge amounts of troops and equipment without gaining anything from it. The Ukrainian economy is very small, I think about the size of Slovakia’s economy. The EU can hold Ukraine’s economy up as long as it wants to. Nobody is doing the same for the Russia.

          If the Russia had to switch to defending territory without gaining anything more, how would it push for a victory before its economy collapsing?

          • VerifiedSource@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Russia has been steadily and slowly gaining territory over the last year.

            If the Russia had to switch to defending territory without gaining anything more, how would it push for a victory before its economy collapsing?

            The current attempt is Trump. It’s doubtful the Russian economy will collapse any time soon. They still have some slack and the Russian population could suffer far more. Their strategy after the first couple of months was to outlast Ukraine and its supporters. The moaning about costs in the countries supporting Ukraine is only growing. Russia has a firm lid on all opposition.

            Nobody is doing the same for the Russia

            China

            • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              the Russia has been steadily and slowly gaining territory over the last year with a speed of 0.7 % of Ukraine’s territory per year. Which is not strategically relevant. Strategically seen, the Russia has not advanced.

              I don’t really see China starting to actively cover the Russian budget. That would jeopardize China’s trade with Europe.

              The Russia’s strategy has been to outlast Ukraine’s supporters will to support Ukraine. That will never happen, unless the voices making the fake claims about time being on the Russia’s side are given too much space. Helping Ukraine is so much cheaper than the costs that incur if the Russia takes over Ukraine that there is no logical reason for the EU to end Ukraine’s support ever. Even if some countries were to withdraw their support, enough will retain it to keep Ukraine’s head over water.

              The Russian economy will collapse, sooner or later.

              • VerifiedSource@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                The Russian economy will collapse, sooner or later.

                I agree, but think it’s later. Russia needs to lose on the battlefield as well before they stop the war.

      • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        They are losing 1300 to 1800 each day

        Russia is losing up to half a million men per year? What’s your source for this? It seems outlandish

        • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Ukraine publishes daily statistics about Russia’s manpower losses. One would think those numbers are simply propaganda and any army would “of course” exaggerate such numbers.

          But, firstly: The numbers reported by Ukraine rise and fall hand-in-hand with the numbers given by Oryx. There is something of an almost fixed multiplier between Oryx numbers and official data provided by Ukraine. And the Oryx numbers are always published later than Ukraine publishes its own, so Ukraine cannot be just copying Oryx’s numbers and multiplying them. And it’s logical that Oryx shows only a fraction of the real number, because for most Russian combat losses there is no photo proof, and Oryx only counts what has photo proof.

          So, at least the Ukrainian numbers rise and drop without fake data added. Then the question is whether the scale of the numbers is correct, or if Ukraine intentionally inflates them with some static multiplier. Since there is data about the Russia’s recruitment capacity and the whole size of the Russia’s army, it’s visible that by recruiting about 1000 per day they can keep their army’s size constant. That shows that the losses must be around the same ballpark. And it coincides with the numbers published by Ukraine.

          But yes, now that Russians mostly do not have tanks to use in their attacks, they are really using pure meat wave attacks, and that costs a LOT of men. There’s a reason Putin is trying to convince Trump to force Ukraine into an armistice. Losing that many soldiers – indeed almost half a million per year! – is extremely unsustainable, no matter what image Putin is trying to give.

          And remember: these numbers are about irrecoverable losses, of which only a fraction are deaths. The number of deaths is far lower.

        • coolusername@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          I think these guys are CIA bots. They aren’t using common sense. Everyone including the state department and CIA agrees that Russia has air superiority right? What do you think the casualties of Russia are compared to Ukraine?

          • Slartibartfast@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Lol what? Russia does not have air superiority. You need a functioning air force for that. They’re to scared to fly anything and Moscow has been hit by Ukrainian drones.

            Lol air superiority. Lol I say.

    • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Russia is running out of troops but their recruitment numbers are way higher than Ukraine’s. I support the Ukrainian armed forces unconditionally and have donated to them multiple times so believe me that it brings me no pleasure to say this, but there is no way Russia runs out of soldiers before Ukraine does.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      It’s not that they will run out of people. They have people, but to keep recruitment levels so high and equipment manufacturing so high they are overcharging their economy. Right now in Russia there are three types of jobs if you want to make money afaik, work in the military complex (arms manufacturing), in the gas extraction industry or directly in the military.

      It’s Dutch disease x100, if the state at some point stops being able to fund the war machine, their economy collapses.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Wow, what an incredible take with zero supporting information, either information I’ve seen published, ever, or information provided by you, the poster.

        Thanks for this, DrDickHandler, it’s really helping this conversation evolve into something better!

        (/s for anyone too tired to see it)

    • Triasha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      It’s also possible they will stop the zapp Brannigan tactics and dig in to wait for the west to lose interest.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Russians are going to be less willing to die to invade Ukraine than Ukrainians are to defend their homes.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        As a person who lives in a place, I would be hard pressed to ever be unwilling to defend the place where I live. I can’t even imagine giving up the fight so a foreign government can occupy the land I call home.

        I would be surprised if Ukrainians would ever get tired of defending their home land.

        I can, however, see Russians being unwilling to sign up to invade a country that clearly doesn’t want them there.

        All I’m trying to say is: I agree.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Ukraine is taking horrendous losses that we should be more concerned about. Stay focussed on Ukraine succeeding, not just Russia failing