• dystop@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    hah, this one is funny!

    Also, echoing @Imotali@lemmy.world’s comment below (unfortunately you can’t sticky comments on lemmy): comments that express hate towards any group are a violation of instance guidelines. BE NICE.

  • Imotali@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    Mod here. Just want to openly and unequivocally state… I will remove your comment if you’re transphobic. I will refer to trans people to let me know if you are being transphobic. I will ban you if you make an egregiously off colour comment. and I will take pleasure in doing this. Fuck your transphobic bullshit, go somewhere else. Nobody wants you here.

    • Che Banana@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Fucking A right. n

      You are amazing, brave people and deserve a place in society where you are loved . M

    • Pokethat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Bruh, just do your job/hobby. Mods acting high and mighty is a big part of what made reddit so toxic.

      • Imotali@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is my job: to make perfectly clear what is and isn’t allowed. In no uncertain terms I will make sure this place is as free from transphobia as possible.

      • gunnm@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The good thing about Lemmy you can move to another instance with free speech.

        • Imotali@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          This is free speech. They get to say what they please. They are not free from the consequences of those words however. I, as a private citizen and not a governmental actor, can censor them.

          • gunnm@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I disagree, free speech means the right to express any opinions and ideas without censorship or restraint even if you find them offensive.

            You said you will remove any comment that is transphobic and ban if “you make an egregiously off colour comment”.

            That is not free speech, and it’s ok. Your instance, your rules.

            • Captain_Waffles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Free speech is about the government not being able to restrict your speech. Guess what? Lemmy isn’t the government.

              • gunnm@monero.town
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Lemmy is a protocol so there can be instances with free speech even if you don’t like it.

                • Captain_Waffles@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  This makes no sense in reply to my comment. Free speech is about the government, changing Lemmy instances won’t change the fact that Lemmy is not the government. My opinion, views, etc have nothing to do with this. As far as free speech is concerned a community would be free to remove trans positive comments if they so chose.

            • Imotali@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              They can say what they want without restraint or restriction. They are not free from the consequences of their words.

              They can say what they like. We can ban them if we don’t like it. That’s how free speech works in a consequentialist society (modern Western society is a synthesis of consequentialism and contractualism).

              • gunnm@monero.town
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Censor and banning opinions and ideas you don’t like is anti free speech.

                • Imotali@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  You were allowed to say it. I’m allowed to remove it. Welcome to the world. Don’t like it? Leave.

                  But also: nobody in the world actually likes the idea of absolutist free speech. The founding fathers certainly didn’t believe in such an idea.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is a pretty awesome way to protest and show solidarity. These trans men are ballsy as fuck and I salute them.

  • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I mean… it’s supposed to be a ‘beauty contest’ so why shouldn’t they compete?

    Not that I don’t think the entire concept of a competition over beauty is stupid, but they exist, so why not just see who wins?

    • Neve8028@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s funny because the original trans sports bans were justified by saying that they would have an unfair advantage. This beauty pageant ban is just transphobes saying that trans women are unfairly attractive lmfao.

  • FReddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’d be more interested in protesting the fact that it’s now legal to grope women in Italy.

    The landmark decision involved a school janitor who jammed his hand into a 17 year old girl’s panties.

    Pick the hill you want to die on.

  • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Wait, they have to tell the organizers such sensible details?

    Are they required to be virgins too?

  • planish@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Has anyone ever seen a “woman from birth”? Like a whole-ass adult woman popping out of somebody not appreciably larger than her? Ready for a beauty pageant at zero minutes old?

    Completely independent of gender, people should know that “women” are adults and have zero overlap with “children” or especially “newborn infants”.

    Or is this a bad translation from the Italian?

  • eggvng@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Elia Bonci, who also spoke to la Repubblica, said: “I took courage, used my deadname and signed up for Miss Italy because fighting transphobia is intersectional and even though I’m not a trans woman, I’ve decided to fight for their rights.”

    much respect to all that followed!

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        They are trans men, who the organizers consider women as opposed to the trans women who can’t compete because they consider them men.

          • PeiPei1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I’ll summarize:

            • The contest organizers don’t accept trans women (AKA assigned male at birth, transitioned to female)

            • This means that they are being transphobic, they aren’t treating trans women as women.

            • The person in the article is the opposite, assigned female at birth and transitioned to male. AKA a trans man.

            • This person is considered a woman by the beauty contest despite identifying as male.

            • He entered the beauty contest as a form of protest and to bring attention to the blatant transphobia.

  • uis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    What is protest part? Not sure it is malicious compliance either because contestant was not rebirthed as woman. Not that it’s possible unless you are buddhist.

  • Crampon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ok sure. But it’s not really an effective protest as they’re fulfilling the requirement to enter the competition. Because the competition is steered by judges they will simply eliminate the trans men in the first round.

    The rule is there to make sure the judges are not sexually aroused when they see a trans woman.

    A greater means of protest would be if the non-trans competitors all quit the pageant. But their look is their only talent, so they won’t.