• iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile BG3 just has one district of Baldurs Gate available and it’s so detailed and jam packed with NPCs that it’s unstable for many people’s computers.

    • distantsounds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean Bethesda’s games are so full of bugs AND barren that I don’t see how this can be an actual talking point. BG3 is running just fine on my 6 year old pc

      • elscallr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure it’s fair to compare Skyrim and BG3. There was like 12 years of development between them, and quite a bit changed in that 12 years.

      • iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I had to move my co-op save to my wife’s PC to continue playing in Act 3. Three year old PC with a 3070. She would crash loading into the Lower City.

        • distantsounds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m a RTX 2080 user and everything is ok here. I’ve had more crashes on starfield than bg3 and have had to revert to earlier saves due to broken mechanics which I’m used to in the Bethesda style of things

          • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Coop in BG3 is fairly buggy (split screen specifically) , I played with my wife close to launch and we ran into all sorts of performance issues and bugs on a high end PC. Still a great game though, but you can tell that split screen didn’t get a lot of love during development

    • CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love BG3. It’s a very different game from Skyrim though. After all, that city is basically a third of the game. Plus BG3 has all kinds of travel and camera limitations that Skyrim doesn’t. That’s what lets them make the city truly seem like a sprawling city.

      By comparison, Skyrim basically lets you go everywhere and it has a far larger map. Skyrim chose the “big as an ocean, shallow as a puddle” approach when it comes to map design. Though NPCs are actually deeper than BG3. Skyrim NPCs have lifes, while BG3 is frozen in a moment.

      • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know Skyrim wasn’t that shallow. It’s not like most of its locations are window dressing like in an assassin’s creed game. Almost the entire map had somewhat meaningful encounters and mini story arcs

      • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There were many spots in Skyrim that were so pretty that I found myself just stopping and staring like I’d do in real life at scenic spots.

        • Noir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The first time you enter the Ratway and you encounter that weirdly beautiful scene of the woodcutter’s axe stuck in the stump?

          ✋😔👌