Ben Shapiro “sell your collapsing coastal house” energy.

Two words my friend: robot bees toothbrushes

Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.

The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.

This is not the friendly middle aged man you are looking for

I certainly don’t do any punching. My weak floppy little arms were made for operating a keyboard.

I would honestly say avoid looking in the mirror when you’re having a GOOD trip. You’ll be trapped! Trapped I say!

The games people play in my ass

Check the other comment thread from the parent, there’s a discussion which goes into it.

There are many different vegans with many different viewpoints. I am not vegan, but I come pretty close - I do still consume a limited amount of dairy, but otherwise I don’t buy animal products. This is for the reasons you say - I don’t want to support factory farming. I also have a limited amount of time in my life for investigating everything I eat, however - I don’t honestly have the stamina to check every egg-containing product to see if it used battery eggs or not. I really don’t have the time to check if the “free range” eggs I’m buying are really free range or if they have sneaked around the regulations and it’s battery farming in disguise. It’s just easier not to buy any eggs.

I will accept eggs from people I know who keep chickens - no problem from me there. I think that humans having relationships with domestic animals is fine, generally we both benefit - the animals because they are protected from predators, they get fed, etc, and us because we gets eggs.

Some vegans would not agree with me. Some vegans don’t believe humans should keep any animals, including pets. I don’t believe there’s an issue with keeping some pets though. Domesticated animals wouldn’t even exist without us… Like it or not their “natural” habitat is living with humans. You couldn’t release all the dogs and expect that to be better for us or them.

Here you go

It’s an interesting point. If I need to confirm that I’m right about something I will usually go to the internet, but I’m still at the behest of my reading comprehension skills. These are perfectly good, but the more arcane the topic, and the more obtuse the language used in whatever resource I consult, the more likely I am to make a mistake. The resource I choose also has a dramatic impact - e.g. if it’s the Daily Mail vs the Encyclopaedia Britannica. I might be able to identify bias, but I also might not, especially if it conforms to my own. We expect a lot of LLMs that we cannot reliably do ourselves.

LLMs are just that - Ms, that is to say, models. And trite as it is to say - “all models are wrong, some models are useful”. We certainly shouldn’t expect LLMs to do things that they cannot do (i.e. possess knowledge), but it’s clear that they can do other things surprisingly effectively, particularly providing coding support to developers. Whether they do enough to warrant their energy/other costs remains to be seen.

That’s a pretty extreme reaction, it’s just a shop.

The stimulant effect of caffeine becomes progressively less effective as you continue to use it regularly and build up a tolerance - if you were to intermittently drink strong coffee you would probably find it having a stronger effect on your ADHD. That said, from my experience the ‘rush’ you get from drinking caffeine only once in a blue moon is quite unpleasant and the positive effects aren’t really worth it… Caffeine imo is best consumed regularly or not at all.

Damn, never heard this but it’s going directly into my vocabulary.

Please just give us a “maybe”

Are you suggesting that the model itself is a compressed version of its training data? I think it requires some stretches of how training works to accept that.

My model has 100% recall and 50% precision, not bad eh?

But - that model would not have 99.9% accuracy.

Recycle the garbage that comes out… Still more garbage out.