Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoHome Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square43linkfedilinkarrow-up1510arrow-down15
arrow-up1505arrow-down1imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square43linkfedilink
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-211 months agoNope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoStill wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.