I have been seeing plenty of guillhotine and mollotov jokes here, and as the title says, punching nazis.

I’ve been reading a book about nonviolence and anarchism, and he basically shows how we shouldn’t use violence, even in extreme cases (like neo nazis).

The main argument is that the means dictates the ends, so if we want a non violent (and non opressing) society, punching people won’t help.

And if it is just a joke, you should probably know that some people have been jailed for decades because of jokes like these (see: avoiding the fbi, second chapter of the book above).

Obviously im up for debate, or else I wouldn’t make this post. And yes, I do stand for nonviolence.

(english is not my first language, im sorry if I made errors, or wansn’t clear.)

(if this is not pertinent, I can remake this post in c/politics or something)

(the book is The Anarchist Cookbook by Keith McHenry, if you are downloading from the internet, make sure you download it from the correct author, there is another book with the same name.)

  • Wogi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    If two parties are at odds with one another, and one on them is willing to use violence and the other isn’t, the violent party wins.

    Non violence works when people care about what you’re going through. If the right people know and care they’ll come in and do violence for you to make it stop. Or at least verifiably threaten violence. But violence is happening whether you did it or not.

    Nazis don’t give a shit about you, they’re eager for violence. They want to exterminate entire classes of people. Non violence does not work on Nazis, we’ve already seen this play out once before.

  • littlecolt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Punched a Nazi in the jaw at a party once. He left and everyone was happier once he did. Fuck that Nazi and his sore Nazi jaw.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not a naturally violent person and thankfully haven’t found myself in a position where I’ve needed to defend myself or others from neo-nazis. But I’m sure I would if it came to it. Neo-nazis are few and far between in my country, but if I seen one get a kicking I wouldn’t be standing in to help them.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I became a leftist, because I got enough of the liberal “they go low, we go high” mantra. You never turn the other cheeck to a person, who will proceed to punch it again. In fact, if they once failed to do better in such cases, they’re just want to abuse your fair game.

  • Womdat10@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Non-violence is a nice ideal, but just that. There’s only so much protests can do, if nazi germany had been met with non-violence, imagine what would have happened. Conversely, imagine how many lives would have been saved if Hitler had been stopped before becoming it’s leader. It’s the same thing with US politics, Trump is basically a neo nazi. This is undeniable if you read project 2025. The US is drifting further and further right, and that means closer and closer to becoming a new nazi germany. And besides all that, if someone is advocating for killing me, then I’m going to want them gone.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Tolerance ends with intolerance. Being nice and civil leads to things like the storming of the US Capital. If US Republicans, for example, felt no resistance then they would organize a crusade into Springfield Ohio.

    It is because we live in a world of controversy and civil unrest that racists cannot simply commit massacres and lynchings like in the old days.

    We have to show fangs, not bellies, to aggressive animals.

  • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    3 days ago

    (transcribed from a series of tweets) - @iamragesparkle

    I was at a shitty crustpunk bar once getting an after-work beer. One of those shitholes where the bartenders clearly hate you. So the bartender and I were ignoring one another when someone sits next to me and he immediately says, “no. get out.”

    And the dude next to me says, “hey i’m not doing anything, i’m a paying customer.” and the bartender reaches under the counter for a bat or something and says, “out. now.” and the dude leaves, kind of yelling. And he was dressed in a punk uniform, I noticed

    Anyway, I asked what that was about and the bartender was like, “you didn’t see his vest but it was all nazi shit. Iron crosses and stuff. You get to recognize them.”

    And i was like, ohok and he continues.

    "you have to nip it in the bud immediately. These guys come in and it’s always a nice, polite one. And you serve them because you don’t want to cause a scene. And then they become a regular and after awhile they bring a friend. And that dude is cool too.

    And then THEY bring friends and the friends bring friends and they stop being cool and then you realize, oh shit, this is a Nazi bar now. And it’s too late because they’re entrenched and if you try to kick them out, they cause a PROBLEM. So you have to shut them down.

    And i was like, ‘oh damn.’ and he said “yeah, you have to ignore their reasonable arguments because their end goal is to be terrible, awful people.”

    And then he went back to ignoring me. But I haven’t forgotten that at all.

  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Anarchism isn’t non-violent. To assume anti-oppression and pacifism are one and the same is to make the same mistake Engels makes in On Authority.

    Authority is violent, but violence is not authority.

    Edit: on this topic I’d recommend Anark’s video on Power, where he explains that anarchism seeks to create a horizontal power structure. It is not the absence of power structures, it displaces oppressive power structures with egalitarian ones.

  • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The biggest advocates for non-violence are white cis heterosexual men. It is the failure to recognize the multifaceted nature of violence itself. Punching a Nazi can mean that other Nazis stop looking up to them, and they stop being able to effectively organize.

    You should be selective and strategic with who you punch. Typically you will want to go for leadership, or the guy who offers a connection between two groups that you consider a risk.

    That being said, you should also consider that you probably aren’t going to have as much success punching a Nazi on their terms. A lot of them are into their gym and guns so it tends to be to your advantage to catch them alone when you are in a group. Sometimes the opportunity will come after one of their demonstrations when they are walking to their car. Other times, it can be useful to find where they live and work.

    Punching Nazis isn’t an everyday thing but its unrealistic to claim it isn’t sometimes necessary. It works very effectively as part of a bigger picture. Alongside it, you can put stickers on their doors in the middle of the night. If the circumstances, you can do silly stuff like convincing one that another fascist is sleeping with his equally shitty wife.

  • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve never seen one but I tell you what, if I see one, I will beat the living fuck outa em

  • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Fascists don’t respond to logic or reasoning, they know only violence so you should speak to them in a language they understand

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131857.2018.1519772

    Violence in a vacuum? Deplorable. Violence against a person preaching or encouraging violence? Questionable. Violence against a known fascist? Absolutely acceptable.

    Fascists hide in the grey areas of free speech and often make arguments, much like this post OP, that twist ethics to support their rhetoric.

    https://www.npr.org/2017/08/19/544641070/explaining-again-thenazis-true-evil

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functionalism–intentionalism_debate

    You may want to investigate the original author of the anarchist cookbook William Powell. He later wanted to remove the book from publication.

    https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-Powell-American-writer

    Also please do not follow any of the recipes, especially the match head bomb as they’re all a great way to lose fingers

    So in conclusion, considering your original points sound similar to the historical defense of fascists, and that book looks to carry the language of fascists.

    How serious is the author of that book about not getting punched?

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      When we had a bunch of white supremacists driving in their lifted trucks, yelling at the BLM protestors and threatening violence against them, there was no use in trying to argue with them. They were just interested in getting into a fight so they could justify using their guns in “self defense”.

      • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        That’s not the nature of my argument. You’re talking about an escalation of violence. I’m talking about preventing them from entering cultural space in the first place. I could spend days listing the proof that there are Nazis in our police and armed forces. That leftists are often the only ones targeted by police.

        I’m talking about direct interpersonal conversation and action.

        Those guys in lifted trucks are useful idiots.

        I open carry at counter protests, I open carry at Drag Story Time. I often have to have long protracted discussions with the police when I protest. Mostly about my protect trans kids and TERF Elimination Squad morale patches and what loadout I have. I am often silent during chants at the protests I attend.

        However I’ve never seen direct instigation from counter protesters like you’re describing, directed at me. They tend to focus on the vocal protestors. I stand next to the megaphone with ear pro on. I try to move slowly and predictably.

        I’m not there to return fire. I’m not there to keep any peace. I’m absolutely not there to instigate or escalate anything.

        This is only my personal experience and means nothing. I am not suggesting this is a useful or necessary act. I’m not encouraging anyone to do this. I never bring a concealed weapon. I always coordinate with the organizers of the event or the protest. I will happily leave if asked however I’ve never been asked before or after to not attend. I only carry at the protest and do not bring weapons into planning spaces or enclosed areas.

        Edit: Since I started going a couple few have joined me. There are much more yelling contests now. But there’s no shoving or pulling or fighting over flags and signs anymore. I really hope in a couple years shit mellows out and I can chant again. “Bottoms Tops we all hate cops!” Is a newer one I really like.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      This is a false dichotomy. There are effective ways to defeat Nazis beyond punching them or reasoned debate.

      Violence is justified in life or death struggles where other options have become unrealistic. That’s not the situation we’re in in the West 99% of the time. Deplatforming, doxxing, civil resistance, and various other forms of nonviolent struggle all have a better track record than street brawls which have done nothing but empower fascists. In fact, the sense of fear and chaos that these events creates is exactly the environment in which fascism will thrive. Street brawls between fascists and leftists were prominent in the Weimar Republic and did nothing to stop Nazi power—if anything it made it easier for the right to unite and paint leftists as unreasonable extremists. We see similar patterns happening today.

      Politics is not the same as armed struggle. We are not engaged in armed struggle against fascism in the west. Perhaps we will be but right now one of our goals should be to avoid that becoming necessary. In the current moment public relations and persuasion matter immensely. Punching Nazis achieves little other than making people lose sight of the dangers of fascism and focus instead on “extremism” from “both sides”.

      And OP has done nothing to suggest they are sympathetic to fascism so your threats against them are extremely rude and unjustified.

      Edit: I also should have stressed that the most important thing is to organize. People power is the real power. Collaborate with and help everyone, not just your Maoist book club or whatever. One of the ways the Fascists won in the past is by dividing people and going after minorities one at a time. If things do devolve into armed struggle, you’ll be much better prepared if you’ve got deep roots in the community.

      • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        You can mock and deride them in media of course. But when a Nazi asks about violence you always respond with language they understand.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I disagree. Fascists want to simplify every conflict this way—“They’re coming to kill you, so we need to kill then first”. By accepting the conflict on those terms, you’ve already conceded a rhetorical battle.

          Leftists have rarely excelled at martial conflict. It’s not typically our strength. Our strength instead is that we fundamentally want to help people and make the world more free and just. We win by making sure people understand that. Getting into fist fights with Nazis undermines this strategy and doesn’t do anything to fundamentally undermine their power.

          • Baaahb@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Nazis aren’t interested in what communists have to say. A communist, for the record, is anyone a Nazi disagrees with. The only acceptable place for a communist, according to a nazi, is in the ground. If you want to let Nazis come for you, I guess that’s fine for you. When Nazis co.e for your loved ones and you Stans there like a fucking coward and let them take them because “much precious nonviolence” I guess that’s your call.

          • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I can kick 200cm from the ground, so I’m going to use that tool to keep the world just :/

            Edit OH SHIT OH SHIT 180CM not 200 I’m not Jet Li

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is the way I’ve come to look at it: non-violence is ideal, but non-violence is one of many “languages.” (Obviously here we’re just talking about violence, but yknow some is political, some is social, etc.) Some people can speak many of these, some people only speak one or refuse to use others (like how you say you will only use nonviolence.)

    The issue is that some people only speak one language, and aren’t going to “understand” (be persuaded or moved by) others no matter what. A bigot only understands hate and emotion so they aren’t going to be swayed from that position by logic or facts because they don’t “speak” that language.

    What I’m getting at, is that for people who only speak violence - non-violence doesn’t mean anything to them except an easy target. They aren’t going to consider your viewpoint because you won’t fight back, they won’t back down because “clearly you aren’t a threat.” They’re going to violence until they reach their ends. With somebody like that, you have to “speak their language.”

    Of course on an individual level you (maybe) can get the police to handle it, but on a social level like dealing with nazis you have to keep them scared of return violence. They are violent by nature (the entire ideology is elimination of undesirables) and should be treated as such. Let them know that we punch nazis. Let them know they aren’t the only ones with guns and unlike most of them we go to the range. Let them know if they wear iron crosses and shit they’re getting kicked the fuck out. Fuck them, and let them know we’d be happy to fuck em up if they want to give us the opportunity.

    I’m generally anti-violence myself, but I’m also a large guy so I’m lucky enough to be able to avoid it. I can’t bring myself to be a pacifist though. Knocking some kid around is easy come take a swing at me and see how it goes. Shrug