• Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because what the US considers left (universal health care, helping the poor, school lunches and affordable education) is considered middle of the road normal stuff in Europe and other developed countries.

    • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      3 months ago

      Even the historical, biggest right wing party in Denmark would not remove any of the things you mentioned, except school lunches.

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    3 months ago

    Easy: even if you vote for Bernie that’s still at best center-left. The US just really, really leans right overall: there’s center-right (democrats) and far-right (republicans) and that’s about it.

    You guys are so afraid of socialism no party dares venture the true left.

    • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      3 months ago

      Americans being afraid of socialism is proof that propaganda works. It’s literally for the people.

      • SeedyOne@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        As does decades of systematically defunding education. The decades of leaded gas/paint by prior generations probably weren’t helping…

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Joe Biden is now the Nickelback /Big Bang Theory of Presidents.

        There’s nothing really bad about him, nothing really great, but they’ve been told to hate on him, so that’s what they’ll do.

    • azimir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      And a good chunk of our parties are now far far right.

      Added bonus: it’s not just socialism that we’re afraid of. We fear tons of things now. We’ve become a nation of fear and boiling hate under the hood and it’s truly toxic.

      Yes, I’ve been working to leave for a few years now. My children shouldn’t have to grow up in a culture of barely surviving, anxiety & fearful people scrabbling over scraps left to us by the ultra wealthy.

  • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because the American left would be considered right wing in most of the world.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Democrats would be the conservative party in my country. The Republicans would be watched by law enforcement for fascistic tendencies, or already outright illegal.

  • theluddite@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Other people have already posted good answers so I just want to add a couple things.

    If you want a very simple, concrete example: Healthcare. It depends on how you count, but more than half the world’s countries have some sort of free or low cost public healthcare, whereas in the US, the richest country in the history of countries, that’s presented as radical left wing kooky unrealistic communist Bernie idea. This isn’t an example of a left-wing policy that we won’t adopt, but of what in much of the world is a normal public service that we can’t adopt because anti-socialism in this country is so malignant and metastasized that it can be weaponized against things that are just considered normal public services almost like roads in other countries.

    A true left wing would support not just things like healthcare, but advocate for an economic system in which workers have control over their jobs, not the bosses. That is completely absent.

    Also, this meme:

    Two panel comic. top one is labeled republicans. bottom one is democrats. they're both planes dropping bombs except democrats has an lgbt flag and blm flag

    It’s glib, but it’s not wrong. Both parties routinely support American militarism abroad. Antimilitarism in favor of internationalism has been a corner stone for the left since the left began.

    • frostmore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      in my world, that’s called same shit different pile.

      also,while i am no right wing supporter, i constantly run into leftist who wouldn’t hesitate to brand me a phobe of their convenience ,none of the right leaning people i interacted with does this… anecdotal i know.

  • Binthinkin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because liberals are just center of right. If you go too far left things become better for workers and not the ruling shit heads.

    • frostmore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      3 months ago

      what happens when you go far left??

      my last interaction with them convinced me they aren’t any different from the alt right.

      • GONADS125@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        Allow me to enlighten you by illustrating how both sides are absolutely not the same

        Some highlights:

        There is a stark difference in the means with which the two groups engage in acts of extremism. In a study evaluating Left-Wing and Right-Wing domestic extremism between 1994 and 2020, there was one fatality as the result of Left-Wing extremism, versus 329 fatalities resulting from Far Right extremism in that 25 year period. [5]

        The Far-Right movement is the oldest and most deadly form of domestic terrorism in the United States, and The Anti-Defamation League Center on Extremism found that the Far-Right is responsible for 98% of extremist murders in the U.S. [24] Furthermore, for nearly every year since 2011, Far-Right terrorist attacks/plots have accounted for over half of all terror attacks/plots in the United States. [21]

        In the U.S., Right-Wing extremism was responsible for two-thirds of all failed, foiled, or successful terror attacks in 2019, and was responsible for 90% of attacks in the first half of 2020 alone. [21] Since 2013, Far-Right extremism has been responsible for more terror attacks/plots than the Left-Wing, ethnonationalism, or religiously motivated attacks/plots. [21]

        References

        These are excerpts from a blog post of mine, but I have ads turned off and do not benefit in any way from it.

            • frostmore@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              3 months ago

              I did,it compared right wing extermism to left wing extremism. one had more death than the other but extremism nonetheless…hence same shit different pile.

              or are you suggesting being a left wing extremist is the better option than say being in the middle ground…because death??

              • BluesF@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                One death from left wing extremism in 25 years, versus 329 from the right, 32900% more. To say that this is the “same shit” is clearly absurd. We aren’t discussing the merits of the middle ground. You seem to be suggesting that just because something is labelled as “extremist” it is automatically bad, regardless of what it actually is or what harm it causes.

                • frostmore@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  one extreme isn’t exactly better than the other. they are extremes and should be regarded as such.

                  left extremism does not represent good neither does it represent evil,same goes for right wing extremism.

                  what i find interesting is people seem to think left wing extremism is the ONLY way to go,ignoring the fact that left wing extremism also practice discrimination, ostracism,bigotry and racism,not that much different from right wing extremism.

              • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Extremism is not good or bad, just like being in the middle is not good or bad either. What matters is what’s correct.

                For example, between being pro-fascism and anti-fascism, anti-fascism is both extreme and correct.

                • frostmore@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  sure,if that’s what you think is correct.

                  i am sure when you preach that being gay is God’s intention,i am sure Christians and Muslim will agree that correct.

                  don’t forget to label me a homophobe if that’s what it is now.

      • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        When you go far left, you have ideologies like Socialism, Communism, and Anarchism, all ideologies that oppose unjust hierarchy and advocate for the good of all.

        The far-right is completely different from the far-left, because the far-right has ideologies like fascism and feudalism. This is an inherently violent, reactionary position found to uphold the status quo, ie the division of power, via absolute measures.

        These are not the same.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This image from 2020 sums it up decently…

    https://imgur.com/a/WqMvpo0

    Also: you guys messed up the colors for the parties, red is for left leaning parties, blue is for right leaning. But I guess that is just the US being the US, like temperature, weight and distance units.

  • rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Because there is no party available to elect, who care for the workers/people.

    You have a system that is designed to take money from the poor and lower class and give it to the rich. You don’t have proper workers rights, spend about twice the amount for healthcare compared to an European person and get substantially less out of it. People work more than 40h/week in more than one job and can’t make ends meet… There are vast rural parts that look more like a third world country. Everything is made for commerce and nobody cares for LGBT people or women unless there’s some money or publicity in it.

    And you have about 2 parties who both participate and stand for that scheme.

  • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    There’s no leftist party, nothing Socialist in the least. The furthest “left” you go is the DNC, which is liberal, and therefore right wing. The furthest right you go is the GOP, which is fascist.

  • MrMobius @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    A few years ago I would have agreed with this statement. But lately, I’ve seen a change described in several press articles and news pieces. The younger generations in the US demand true social justice and aren’t afraid to say they’re socialists, against capitalism or consumerism. It’s a burgeoning revolution of course, since the establishment is still in control of traditional political parties. But this crack in the old broken system could bring about positive change in the long run. At least I hope so.

  • Anthony@buc.ci
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    @return2ozma@lemmy.world One way to think about “the left” is that it values freedom from domination. Who in the US is fighting to reduce the level of domination we experience in important areas of life (health care, education, food, housing to name a few)? Should we really have to pay and put ourselves into debt–thereby becoming dominated–to go to school, live somewhere, or maintain our health? Even the so-called left in the US supports this arrangement generally; at best they fight over the details, not the structure itself.

  • vin@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Examples of true left would be codeterminisn in Germany and banning tuition fees in Finland.

  • stembolts@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If one were to gather political parties from around the world and sort them as left-leaning, center, or right-leaning, one could do so. However when it came time to compare the left-leaning parties of other developed nations with the left-leaning parties of the united states, it would quickly become apparent that the “most-left” party in the united states aligns with center-right and far-right parties of other developed nations. So, doing such analysis you quickly come to realize that the united states has no true left-wing party. We have conservative and conservative-light. It should also be noted that the conservative party in the united states is much further right than most other developed nations.

    Also, remember, right-left is a duopoly, much like Pepsi and Coke. There are so many more dimensions to politics than right-left, there’s a thousand different parties for every ideology. For more info on this, check out the podcast linked at the end. Support ranked choice voting if you want to take steps to end this duopoly. What do you have to lose? Entrenched life-long, un-removeable politicians. What do you have to gain? Choice. Variety. More direct democratic representation and politicians that better reflect their voter’s interests.

    Freakanomics
    Episode 356
    America’s Hidden Duopoly
    https://freakonomics.com/podcast/americas-hidden-duopoly-2/