Removed double quotes, added single quotes
someone later on -m “removed single quotes, added double quotes”
More commits == More money!!!
Real talk: I have worked at a company where an exec briefly had the bright idea to rank developers on number of commits made.
You can imagine how that turned out.
He wasn’t an exec for very long.
lmaoo, I can’t believe someone actually did that and was serious about it.
I’m already imagining commits piling up with comments like:- “add a newline”
- “move function up”
- “rename variable
userstouser_list” - “Revert previous commit”
- “no John, it’s
user_listand that’s it, don’t you dare change it again”
He wasn’t an exec for very long.
Good riddance I guess
Oh, no, we can do better.
Every single line of every single PR is an individual commit. And never squash-commit.
Talk about atomic commits
If you really want to nuke it from orbit: do it for every character.
It is absolutely technically feasible to go further than that, but I think that’s the point of diminishing returns in terms of effort.
Why do u prefer single quotes?
I have no preference! It was to do with Spring/yaml config and some really strange conflict which required the use of single quotes. I’m still a total noob in the world of software dev, so I wouldn’t be able to explain why it worked 🤣
Squash me later
My commit messages have gotten extremely lazy since I start squashing all my commits down to one. I just describe the PR on the first commit message and write nonsense in all the others.
deleted by creator
“Update”
It was my dotfiles, ok?
You’re going to regret not adding the second sentence to the commit message some day.
Tests: Add a few test files.
I thought we lost you … Jia Tan!
Initial commit
grats on formalising your (new) project
God read my code and it made Him cry“Changed consent banner text to reflect from legal, even though they are wrong”
“circumvented GDPR despite calling out strong ethical objections, because legal & management are forcing me to”
Update coffee list and tex files.
…and yes we have our office coffee list in a git repo.
Do new hires have to submit a pull request to get in on it? If so, I’m guessing the non-technical staff don’t get to drink a lot of coffee.
It’s actually just a paper list where people make ticks for coffee. That is then manually synced to an hledger file in git.
For what? To keep track of who’s drinking coffee? Are you charging for coffee?
I work in academia… There is no free coffee here.
Mfw I
git push -fAlways force-with-lease
Do you have any plans to open source your coffee list? I want to add this feature where I get an iced coffee in the morning
“fix for real this time”
“28496 - there, it’s fucking fixed you twat waffle.”
Ticketed bug bosses son found. Dude nagged his dad who nagged us until it got fixed. Boss doesn’t review code. And for the sake of a half dozen coworkers, I hope he never does.
deleted by creator
Oof
“;”
Previous commit was some stupid easy fix I didn’t even bother compiling. Well, I should have, because it was the first time in recent memory I committed some code with a missing semicolon…
Before anyone asks : no, we don’t do reviews ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join me and use
~to mean “shit changed just check the diff”For those I just commit with the message “ngl there’s a lot of changes in here”
Tweaked some things
+2543; -5642;“Moved code base from 2 spaces to 4.”
“I’m sorry, guys.”
git commit -m “if this doesn’t fix it I’m looking up availabilities at my nearest maccas”
Hrfg7ygfrvvby
