Let me explain the question:

If fox news and religious propaganda are exactly that, propaganda, then they are victims.

If, however, every person is free to listen to what they want and then rant against liberals, migrants, Muslims, Arabs, trans, gays, atheists, you name it, then they are just gullible.

I’d have more patience for a victim than a gullible person.

Everybody is free to believe what they want to believe. What I don’t get is why they have to stir things up and why they believe they are the only ones getting it and everyone else is dumb, woke, a communist or is going to hell. Why can’t they keep their opinions to themselves?

  • illi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Maybe I’m missing some nuance of the word but if they believe the stuff because they are gullible… isn’t that what makes them the victim?

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    The gullible often become victims. I don’t understand the distinction you’re making. Between personal failing and societal failing? They feed into each other. Both warrant correction.

  • Name-Not-Applicable@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    It happens with liberals, too. Having said that, people really do need to go outside, get away from the 24/7 media feed, talk to actual people, and apply some critical thinking on their own. None of us is the main character.

    • Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m the main character, obviously, why else would the sun revolve around the earth? Purely to honor me the main character, reincarnated in this dying world to save it from the demon lord known as See Oh Too, and its generals Shell, BP, and Chevron. /S

      • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        save it from the demon lord known as See Oh Too, and its generals Shell, BP, and Chevron.

        HOORAY!

        /S

        …oh :(

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      You have simultaneously also described why you can’t easily unite a left-leaning base. My issue is obviously the most important (and so is everyone else’s to them) at every moment. Also if you are a rep you are honor bound to resign and recuse and be a perfect parent of the children in the other camp.

      Yes, we can walk and chew gum, but you can’t chase every car in the lot at the same time and you can’t shoot yourself in the leg out of honor when the competition is going to shoot your other leg for spite.

    • intelisense@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Honestly, I think there is a real problem with infantilisation - and (Warning: unpopular opinion) a large part of this is the marvel films and manga trend. Those always over simplify every problem to a short, violent solution.

      • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Those always over simplify every problem to a short, violent solution.

        Yeah, entertainment totally didn’t do this before Marvel and manga. 🤨

        • mynachmadarch@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Seriously, blaming entertainment (actual entertainment, not “news” that weasels in court calling itself entertainment) has been a thing since the stone ages. It wasn’t true about rock and roll, it wasn’t true about dime novels, it’s not true now about superhero stuff.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Are we really that sure that tv did not actually “rot people’s brains” to varying degrees? I would be interested in a more rigorous study of this before we dismiss all entertainment influences as simple culture war bullshit due to the genuinely overwhelming overuse of culture war arguments.

            • mynachmadarch@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’ve looked into this before for arguments with my mother trying to get her to stop saying there’s a gay agenda. Her argument was because I enjoy the videogames and sci-fi I wasn’t smart enough to understand the truth. The science has actually been done (though I’m sure more still needs to be done).

              Research by a scientist named Schwartz in 2016 showed that those predisposed to anti-social behaviour are also naturally pre-disposed to watch more TV. When accounting for genetic traits, previous research into negative affects of TV didn’t hold up amongst children and young adults (mentally, physically yes, but we already knew sedentary lifestyle has negative impacts).

              A (I Believe Johns Hopkins but I’m going from memory) 20 year data evaluation released in 2021 showed that excessive TV can contribute to cognitive decline over time (they measured a 0.5% reduction amongst the adults they tested). The main scientist I remember saying they didn’t account for type of media and did think educational content like documentaries would have a smaller impact though he couldn’t guess by how much. His worry wasn’t about the average adult making decisions but rather preserving as much mental capacity long term so as to help reduce impacts of dementia.

              A 2023 UK study backed up the 2021 and 2016 study. Excess causes increased health risks and a long term small measurable cognitive decline.

              Everything I’ve seen points to, for the most part, the amount being the problem as with everything. Moderation is key and living a diverse life that stimulates you mentally overall is important. Manga or Marvel movies when you want to relax is not going to rot your brain. Only consuming them will, same as with any type of media or genre.

  • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’d put them on the same level of victimhood as followers of people like Charles Manson. They probably wouldn’t have done what they did without his influence but they’re still culpable for the damage they’ve caused.

  • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Being abnormally gullible can be a symptom of some types of mental health issues. Extremely gullible people, especially, deserve compassion.

  • Tehhund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Blame is not a finite resource. Just because 2 people are involved doesn’t mean they’re both 50% to blame — they can both be 100% at fault.

    So to answer your question, the person is responsible for their onerous views. They chose to watch that trash and believe it. We can have compassion for them without absolving them of blame. At the same time, they are a victim of the people lying to them. So it’s fine to blame the person consuming the bullshit and the person producing the bullshit, and the fact that there are 2 people to blame doesn’t make either of them any less to blame.

  • whaleross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I think the “people are free to believe what they want to believe” is a mistake. This is the very statement that relativitises opinions and belief systems with facts and creates the illusion that they are all equal.

    Look at the “facts don’t care about feelings” crowd that believe wholeheartedly that statements pandering to their feelings are facts and disregard any actual facts as fake news. I don’t think it’s because they decided one day to pick and choose what is a fact and what is not, but they actually can’t tell that there is a difference in opinions, beliefs and facts in the first place.

    People need to accept that sometimes the truth is painful, that it contradicts what you want it to be, and worst of all - that you may have been wrong.

    Edit: that said, I think people are free to believe whatever they want to believe when it comes to unprovable existential esoterica like personal values, afterlife, religion, whatever. As long they accept it is a personal belief and not an universal truth.

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Don’t know that I’d characterize it as being “victims”, their media outlets have chosen to fuel anxiety and anger that was already there.

    The media is culpable for pouring fuel on the fire, but the fire was already there. They are emboldened to be loud since they find such loud agreement from media and online, but they already were thinking the same basic things.

  • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    They’re absolutely NOT a victim. A victim is an unwilling participant in an act committed against them.

    Stupidity isn’t not a viable excuse to be a victim.

  • therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    They are falling for engagement strategies all news media outlets use. They will say things that pander to a specific group pointing the finger at the other side so you’ll stuck with their station. Both liberal and conservative sites do this. Journalism is dead