• Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    27 days ago

    Motorola without a doubt. One of the few companies that still believe that a high end phone doesn’t need to cost 2000 dollars.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      I’m in camp moto as well. The other lovely thing is gestures. Shake your phone to put on the torch, turn it around and back twice to activate the camera.

    • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      The shake for the flashlight option my Motorola phone had was by far the best thing every. I can’t believe other manufacturers haven’t added that as an option.

    • VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Love my G31 as a daily driver and Music player. Does all it needs to, and for a very reasonable price. Also, has a headphone jack and an SD card slot :)

  • Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    For me it’s Motorola because they are one of the few companies still iterating and throwing different weird designs at the wall to see what sticks.

    • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      Agreed.

      $300 for the g84, I’m quite happy. Dual sim Call recording Stereo speakers Headphone socket Oled display Sd card Fast charge 5Ah battery Thin and light. 5g

      Only downside is mediocre camera. Ok if you don’t need to zoom in.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      27 days ago

      Hopefully they’ll throw one at the wall with a slide-out QWERTY keyboard lol. Whoever does that again (that’s not a niche device full of other issues) will get my money immediately.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      I agree. They seem to never get enough attention in the press but they make really nice phones.

      I will buy an edge 50 pro soon but having a hard time finding the white one for a good price.

    • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      This feels like the correct answer.

      Motorola and a couple others feel like at least they haven’t jumped on the “let’s charge them whatever the hell we can get away with” train. They’re still relatively inexpensive and are essentially just as capable and nice as the Samsungs and the Apples of the world. Hell, I get far more comments on my Motorola Edge 2023 with it’s textured faux leather back than others get with the latest Sammy or Apple identical square.

      It feels like these smaller producers are able to take a few more risks in design.

        • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          27 days ago

          Sadly yes. That’s the drawback. But its balanced by the fact that its pretty easy to find good custom ROMs after it ends its software lifespan

          • TheBraveSirRobbin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            I have the same phone, but don’t really have any clue what any of this means. If you’re up for it I wouldn’t mind an ELI5 on this so that I have at least an idea of what it means or what to look up. If you’re not up for the ELI5 I still appreciate what you put out there

  • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    27 days ago

    I ordered a Fairphone 4 and had it shipped over to the US before they officially supported US carriers and got their reseller state side to fix some minor issues.

    And its also cute I get to play the “Organic” card for a piece a tech. The device itself is good enough and with the repairability focus I can take my battery out as a party trick. (I have seriously done this, it works best for Iphone people)

    • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      How is camera on that? I remember earlier Fairphones were pretty bad in this regard, which was a deal breaker for me.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        27 days ago

        If the camera is that important, then look for a phone where the camera is the primary feature. Samsung has some nice ones these days, Fairphones offerings are generally average across the industry, many claim they are over priced, but that is due to their picky component/vendor selection (See their attempts at ethicaly sourced parts).

        • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          It’s not that it’s that important, but what I saw from Fairphone 1 or 2 (I don’t know which model exactly, maybe even 3) was really underwhelming. Not that my current phone makes epic photos, otoh it cost me about third of a Fairphone. Their mission is great and that’s why I’d consider phone from them. I wouldn’t mind slower CPU or less storage for my needs, but not improving camera from my current phone doesn’t make sense for me to switch.

  • timestatic@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    27 days ago

    Gotte be Fairphone. I bought the FP5 when it was out pretty new from Murena. It came with a de-googled android rom called /e/ preinstalled. Couldn’t be happier. I love the way you can just open the back and exchange any part with a simple phillips head screwdriver as well as exchangeable batteries. It’s still splash resistant tho. I love knowing neither google nor apple are tracking me and supporting open source software monetarily. It works a bit different from stock android but its nice to use. I also like how they have long software support and care about where their parts are sourced. For their performance they might be a bit pricy but it aligns with my ideals so I support it.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Whichever ones allow bootloader unlocking, make it not a PITA to unlock, and are generally developer friendly (or at least not antagonistic to developers).

    For a while that was Motorola, but I’ve read recently less models are allowed to be unlocked. OnePlus is also pretty good about unlocking the bootloader.

  • waz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    If you had asked me a couple weeks ago, I would have said Unihertz. I loved my tiny little Jelly Star.

    Unfortunately, the backlight for the screen died. It is still technically under warranty, but the options they gave me were 1) We’ll ship you the part, and you can pay a local shop to put it in. 2) Pay to mail us the phone, and we’ll fix it and get it back to you in the next month or two. or 3) Buy a replacement phone at a discount.

    It irks me that the only option that won’t cost me more money is having them ship me the part and trying to replace it myself.

    I still like the little phone, but there is no way in hell I am giving that company any more of my money.

    Sorry for the rant. To actually answer the question: I like my Google Phone. I don’t love Google per se, but the phone itself works pretty well.

    Edit: Since writing this, I received the replacement screen, and I will say that it was surprisingly easy to take apart and repair. I don’t think most people already have the tools to do so, and I still don’t think I should be responsible for the repair myself, but I do once again have a functional phone after spending 0 additional dollars. Also, I like the phone just a little bit more because it was substantially easier to take apart than all of the other phone’s I’ve worked on.

  • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    27 days ago

    Okay so not specifically to do with smartphones but Nokia was the most innovative and creative designer of cell phones altogether, until they made the unfortunate mistake of going all-in with Windows Phone with the Lumia. They should have been smart enough to see that like almost everything MS does, it was doomed from the start. It was their downfall :-( So sad because they made some of the most gorgeous phones in the world.

    I have a modest collection of Nokia phones and I’d like one day to have one of everything they made.

    Smartphones nowadays are just catalysts to exploitation. There’s no more innovation they’re just cramming more things they can claim as “features” without really making any substantial innovation anymore. There are a handful of gems here and there but they’re really spread evenly across the gamut of brands. Also there are so many more smartphones with cool designs and functionality that are just not available in the U.S.A. I don’t really understand why, other than the big names wanting to keep the market stuck to the same handful of gigantic bricks that refuse the idea of any flavor or character. Maybe they lobby to keep affordable and innovative designs out of the U.S. market so they can keep peddling their mediocrity forever.

  • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    iPhone, though this site hates Apple. I had a HTC Dream, then the okay successor, then switched to and iPhone 5s when my partner got one and at the time it was the best phone to touch type on. Android got better but I quit all Google services and hardware.

    I’ve had two iPhones that have lasted 5+ years. I’m current on a six year old XS max. I’m only upgrading this year because I want USB-C, a 120hz screen, and better low light pictures for cats.

    The only thing I use iTunes for is one click encrypted incremental backups and I stand by it’s the best backup software for phones. When I get my new phone, I will plug it into my computer, click a button, and it will be exactly like my current phone. And that’s awesome.

    I use windows for games and Linux for my servers, but I can’t say i don’t love my iPhonez.

      • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        Android people here often have a Spec Champion phone… and a Daily Driver one.

        I only have a daily driver iPhone I bought 6 years ago and it can still daily drive me.

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    Fairphone, as their hardware is comparable to other phones, while still supporting many custom ROMs. And they’re very repairable.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    27 days ago

    HTC 7: front facing speakers, microsd slot up to 2TB, 469 ppi , full brushed aluminum casing, smoooth OS, best phone i ever had, especially at the time, blew everything else out of rhe water.

    still can’t believe big companies aren’t making phones with front facing speakers.

    • ShouldIHaveFun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      27 days ago

      Sony Xperia still have front facing speakers.

      I really like that Sony didn’t abandoned good features just to follow the hype. Some of those features are a headphone jack, an SD card and a small screen (big screens also available in the 1 series).

      • Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        The xperia is more expensive then what I would usually spend on a phone, but it is probably the only phone that still has all those things you mentioned, which are nearly all dealbreakers for me. (Asus zenfone why did you have to become big :( )

        • ShouldIHaveFun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          25 days ago

          Have a look at the Xperia 10 Series (for example the Xperia 10 VI), they have all those features for what I find is a reasonable price.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        thank you!

        the new one does! xperia 1 vi, jesus that’s great, thank you.

        I wanted a fair phone, but front-facing speakers are absolutely huge for me.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Most new phones have at one front facing speaker. Does it really make a lot of difference with one more?

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        huge difference, yes.

        especially with volume, accuracy, clarity and pitch. on most phones with speakers spacing away from you, it’s like having one speaker plugged into your TV, it’s pointed away from you at corner of your wall.

        you can turn it up as loud as the speaker will go, but the sound quality isn’t going to increase.

        you can imagine the difference having a conversation with someone looking at you versus having a conversation with someone turned away from you.

        and the difference in quality between the speaker at the top of most phones and the bottom facing speaker is very clear, whereas most front-facing phones focus on two good speakers.

        Yes, it makes a huge difference if you enjoy music, movies, podcasts; anything with sound on an HTC One from 11 years ago will sound much better than what the newest iPhone or pixel can offer because the speakers are facing you instead of playing audio away from you(and the HTC one speakers kicked ass)

  • Eiri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    26 days ago

    I’d guess OnePlus. Been a while since I bought my current Samsung, but I miss their better interface and battery saving often.

    Though it truly is a shame that they started putting the fingerprint sensors under the screen, too. The meh sensor on the Samsung is possibly my biggest irritant. But reportedly at least the OnePlus one is better.

  • Noxious@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    Pixels are nice because of their hardware secure element and great Verified boot support, even with a custom OS. And those new Pixel 9’s are really fire 🔥

  • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    Apple actually makes good hardware, believe it or not. The only real shortcomings of the iPhone are the software and the reparability. Say, hypothetically, you could load a custom ROM on an iPhone. It would be my favourite in that case.

    We don’t live in a good world, though, so it has to go to Google. It will continue to be Google until Apple fixes their business. I dislike the buttons being on one side, I dislike the gap between display and the border, and I dislike the cameras being covered when I try to get a grip on the back–but alternative OSes exist. The software is everything. I have far more utility here than on the more expensive iPhone.

    Though, I have to say that I might genuinely consider an Xperia if they had alternative OSes. Good cameras, headphone jack, nice build… it’s a shame I can’t put CalyxOS on one.