Background: 15 years of experience in software and apparently spoiled because it was already set up correctly.

Been practicing doing my own servers, published a test site and 24 hours later, root was compromised.

Rolled back to the backup before I made it public and now I have a security checklist.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    5 months ago

    One time, I didn’t realize I had allowed all users to log in via ssh, and I had a user “steam” whose password was just “steam”.

    “Hey, why is this Valheim server running like shit?”

    “Wtf is xrx?”

    “Oh, it looks like it’s mining crypto. Cool. Welp, gotta nuke this whole box now.”

    So anyway, now I use NixOS.

  • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve gotta say this post made me appreciate switching to lemmy. This post is actually helpful for the poor sap that didn’t know better, instead of pure salt like another site I won’t mention.

    • Tablaste@linux.communityOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      I shared it because, out there, there is a junior engineer experiencing severe imposter syndrome. And here I am, someone who has successfully delivered applications with millions of users and advanced to leadership roles within the tech industry, who overlook basic security principles.

      We all make mistakes!

    • Tablaste@linux.communityOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I published it to the internet and the next day, I couldn’t ssh into the server anymore with my user account and something was off.

      Tried root + password, also failed.

      Immediately facepalmed because the password was the generic 8 characters and there was no fail2ban to stop guessing.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          More importantly, don’t open up SSH to public access. Use a VPN connection to the server. This is really easy to do with Netbird, Tailscale, etc. You should only ever be able to connect to SSH privately, never over the public net.

          • troed@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s perfectly safe to run SSH on port 22 towards the open Internet with public key authentication only.

                • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  A VPN like Wireguard can run over UDP on a random port which is nearly impossible to discover for an attacker. Unlike sshd, it won’t even show up in a portscan.

                  This was a specific design goal of Wireguard by the way (see “5.1 Silence is a virtue” here https://www.wireguard.com/papers/wireguard.pdf)

                  It also acts as a catch-all for all your services, so instead of worrying about the security of all the different sshds or other services you may have exposed, you just have to keep your vpn up to date.

                • designatedhacker@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Are you talking a VPN running on the same box as the service? UDP VPN would help as another mentioned, but doesn’t really add isolation.

                  If your vpn box is standalone, then getting root is bad but just step one. They have to own the VPN to be able to even do more recon then try SSH.

                  Defense in depth. They didn’t immediately get server root and application access in one step. Now they have to connect to a patched, cert only, etc SSH server. Just looking for it could trip into some honeypot. They had to find the VPN host as well which wasn’t the same as the box they were targeting. That would shut down 99% of the automated/script kiddie shit finding the main service then scanning that IP.

                  You can’t argue that one step to own the system is more secure than two separate pieces of updated software on separate boxes.

          • josefo@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Tailscale? Netbird? I have been using hamachi like a fucking neanderthal. I love this posts, I learn so much

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Lol ssh has no reason to be port exposed in 99% of home server setups.

        VPNs are extremely easy, free, and wireguard is very performant with openvpn also fine for ssh. I have yet to see any usecase for simply port forwarding ssh in a home setup. Even a public git server can be tunneled through https.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yeah I’m honest with myself that I’m a security newb and don’t know how to even know what I’m vulnerable to yet. So I didn’t bother opening anything at all on my router. That sounded way too scary.

          Tailscale really is magic. I just use Cloudflare to forward a domain I own, and I can get to my services, my NextCloud, everything, from anywhere, and I’m reasonably confident I’m not exposing any doors to the innumerable botnet swarms.

          It might be a tiny bit inconvenient if I wanted to serve anything to anyone not in my Tailnet or already on my home LAN (like sending al someone a link to a NextCloud folder for instance.), but at this point, that’s quite the edge case.

          I learned to set up NGINX proxy manager for a reverse proxy though, and that’s pretty great! I still harden stuff where I can as I learn, even though I’m confident nobody’s even seeing it.

          • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Honestly, crowdsec with the nginx bouncer is all you need security-wise to start experimenting. It isn’t perfect security, but it is way more comprehensive than fail2ban for just getting started and figuring more out later.

            Here is my traefik-based crowdsec docker composer:

            services:
              crowdsec:
                image: crowdsecurity/crowdsec:latest
                container_name: crowdsec
                environment:
                  GID: $PGID
                volumes:
                  - $USERDIR/dockerconfig/crowdsec/acquis.yaml:/etc/crowdsec/acquis.yaml
                  - $USERDIR/data/Volumes/crowdsec:/var/lib/crowdsec/data/
                  - $USERDIR/dockerconfig/crowdsec:/etc/crowdsec/
                  - $DOCKERDIR/traefik2/traefik.log:/var/log/traefik/traefik.log:ro
                networks:
                  - web
                restart: unless-stopped
            
              bouncer-traefik:
                image: docker.io/fbonalair/traefik-crowdsec-bouncer:latest
                container_name: bouncer-traefik
                environment:
                  CROWDSEC_BOUNCER_API_KEY: $CROWDSEC_API
                  CROWDSEC_AGENT_HOST: crowdsec:8080
                networks:
                  - web # same network as traefik + crowdsec
                depends_on:
                  - crowdsec
                restart: unless-stopped
            
            networks:
              web:
                external: true
            

            https://github.com/imthenachoman/How-To-Secure-A-Linux-Server this is a more in-depth crash course for system-level security but hasn’t been updated in a while.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 months ago

    How are people’s servers getting compromised? I’m no security expert (I’ve never worked in tech at all) and have a public VPS, never been compromised. Mainly just use SSH keys not passwords, I don’t do anything too crazy. Like if you have open SSH on port 22 with root login enabled and your root password is password123 then maybe but I’m surprised I’ve never been pwned if it’s so easy to get got…

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      By allowing password login and using weak passwords or by reusing passwords that have been involved in a data breach somewhere.

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        That makes sense. It feels a bit mad that the difference between getting pwned super easy vs not is something simple like that. But also reassuring to know, cause I was wondering how I heard about so many hobbyist home labs etc getting compromised when it’d be pretty hard to obtain a reasonably secured private key (ie not uploaded onto the cloud or anything, not stored on an unencrypted drive that other people can easily access, etc). But if it’s just password logins that makes more sense.

    • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Do not allow username/password login for ssh

      This is disabled by default for the root user.

      $ man sshd_config
      
      ...
             PermitRootLogin
                     Specifies whether root  can  log  in  using  ssh(1).   The  argument  must  be  yes,  prohibit-password,
                     forced-commands-only, or no.  The default is prohibit-password.
      ...
      
      
  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m confused. I never disable root user and never got hacked.

    Is the issue that the app is coded in a shitty way maybe ?

    • Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      You can’t really disable the root user. You can make it so they can’t login remotely, which is highly suggested.

  • DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    As a linux n00b who just recently took the plunge and set up a public site (tho really just for my own / selfhosting),

    Can anyone recommend a good guide or starting place for how to harden the setup? Im running mint on my former gaming rig, site is set up LAMP

  • phx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    Had this years ago except it was a dumbass contractor where I worked who left a Windows server with FTP services exposed to the Internet and IIRC anonymous FTP enabled, on a Friday.

    When I came in on Monday it had become a repository for warez, malware, and questionable porn. We wiped out rather than trying to recover anything.

  • satans_methpipe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    On a new linux install or image I will always:

    • Make new users(s)
    • Setup new user to sudo
    • Change ssh port
    • Change new user to authenticate ssh via key+password
    • Disable root ssh login
  • DavidGA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    Although disabling the root user is a good part of security, leaving it enabled should not alone cause you to get compromised. If it did, you were either running a very old version of OpenSSH with a known flaw, or, your chosen root password was very simple.

      • DavidGA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        It should be a serious red flag that your VPS host is generating root passwords simple enough to get quickly hacked.

        • Tablaste@linux.communityOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m pretty sure they assumed if you bought their service, you have the competency to properly set it up.

          And I proved them wrong.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m having the opposite problem right now. Tightend a VM down so hard that now I can’t get into it.

  • gerryflap@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve been quite stupid with this but never really had issues. Ever since I changed the open ssh port from 22 to something else, my server is basically ignored by botnets. These days I obviously also have some other tricks like fail2ban, but it was funny how effective that was.

    • kureta@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Almost the same here. I also change some ssh settings: disable root login, disable password, allow only public key login. That’s about it. I never had any problems.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      We’re not really supposed to expose the ssh port to the internet at all. Better to hide it behind a vpn.

      But it’s too damn convenient for so many use cases. Fuck it. Fail2Ban works fine.

      You can also set up an ssh tarpit on port 22, which will tie up the bot’s resources and get them stuck in a loop for a while. But I didn’t think it was worth attracting extra attention from the bot admins to satisfy my pettiness.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Permitting inbound SSH attempts, but disallowing actual logins, is an effective strategy to identify compromised hosts in real-time.

    The origin address of any login attempt is betraying it shouldn’t be trusted, and be fed into tarpits and block lists.

  • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Weird. My last setup had a NAT with a few VMs hosting a few different services. For example, Jellyfin, a web server, and novnc/vm. That turned out perfectly fine and it was exposed to the web. You must have had a vulnerable version of whatever web host you were using, or maybe if you had SSH open without rate limits.