• anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    They are not wrong, in typical US style they will just declare its done and leave Ukraine in enormous debt and left to fend for itself

        • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          There’s usually a big spike in “grassroots opposition” to anything supporting ukraine whenever ukraine gets support.

          Lemmy was originally created by “communists” who kept getting banned on Reddit). They get a bit riled up whenever something that goes against the interests of their favorite formerly sort of red country happens.

          They’re fanatics, zealots. they don’t even need to be paid to shill for these despotic regimes. They do it for free.

          They’re just like the far right in the US… useful idiots who huff propaganda

          • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The comparison of their style of rhetoric to right wingers in the US makes sense. On the surface it’s hard to tell which group is talking

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The block feature has slowly made my experience here a hell of a lot better. These threads tend to give me new fodder for it

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Was about to say, at least the US withdrawing from Afghanistan isn’t literally a cause of the entire country collapsing into 14 smaller new states and also the entire western bloc

      • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Tbf it kinda is, because if the US had gone into Afghanistan with a plan to help Afghani’s fix infrastructure, homes, trade routes, etc things would have turned out far better than they did.

  • shiroininja@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean he’s kinda right if we don’t just commit to fully helping Ukraine instead of waffling with every budget, bill, and election.

    But him saying that is a good way to motivate stubborn Americans, so he can keep on saying it. It’ll get us going.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Really?

    Last I checked, we haven’t had almost 500k casualties and lost billions in military craft to old mothballed weapons we since moved on from.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s actually kinda incredible for Russia to have not realized that the US is literally just letting Ukraine integrate itself into NATO standards by training on and building up NATO standard equipment as it runs out of the shitty Soviet era alternatives

      Meanwhile Moscow is instead developing a dependency on Iranian and Chinese made military hardware, stuff that neither is especially willing to part with given their own war plans.

      The US could 1000% just barely provide enough aid to tactically let Russia chew its teeth out trying to break Ukraine, but it’s sending what Ukraine needs to win whenever it can because the US sees Ukraine winning as more important than Russia losing at this point.

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Unfortunately “barely enough” is closer to the mark. Ukraine should’ve had this funding last year and we should’ve been close to the next round at this point. If this is actually all America can muster when it is committed to “winning” then then thats a bit sad and scary considering the incompetent broke ass country we are trying to beat while having homecourt advantage.

        The only thing that gives me solace is that this is carefully architected to bleed out Russia and not actually a show of real force.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        US is literally just letting Ukraine integrate itself into NATO standards by training on and building up NATO standard equipment as it runs out of the shitty Soviet era alternatives

        Not just Ukraine, either! All the NATO Easteron Bloc countries donated their Soviet equipment (and much more) and are actively rearming and retraining their own militaries on NATO standard equipment.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        US is literally just letting Ukraine integrate itself into NATO standards by training on and building up NATO standard equipment

        Excellent point. Due to the equipment Ukraine now has the west is at a point where they will stand to lose a lot of valuable technology if Russia wins making it necessary for western intervention if things go bad for Ukraine.

      • BigilusDickilus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        At the risk of being jingoistic, this type of opponent is exactly what our military is designed to utterly destroy. If the US was an active participant it would have very quickly wiped the floor with the Russian army and would be dealng with Russian backed insurgents in the east.

        Ukraine has been beating them with the stuff we routinely throw away (when the Republicans don’t get in the way), I am convinced they have no non nuclear answer to our actual military.

        • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          40 years ago maybe, but afaik after 20 years of Iraq and Afghanistan the us army has shifted quite far into focusing on counterinsurgency and away from fighting vs mass armor and artillery

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The USA has plans, thousands of plans and how to modify them agains the russians (well the USSR), and that’s as important as having the right tools/weapons.

          • BigilusDickilus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I mean, they’ve gotten way better at it, but most of their equipment and doctrine are still targeted at utterly destroying a near peer level threat. The f-22 wasn’t designed to fight insurgents, nor is it suited to that task.

            I would think that the USAF would happily establish and easily enforce a no fly zone over Ukraine and could probably pull it off within a few days of getting the order conservatively.

            There was the story a few years ago when a well equipped and trained Wagner battalion “accidentally” picked a flight with a US army unit or base in Syria and got immediately demolished.

            Writing this out definitely feels like braggadocio and it likely is. But I would think the Russians don’t want to find out why we don’t have universal healthcare first hand.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Russian officials publicly assure the world that their invasion will only last 1 week due to their overwhelming military superiority.

    109 weeks later without a victory, kidding twice as many soldiers and equipment, Russian officials swear that the US, not an active combatant, is going to be so embarrassed.

  • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Russia says US support for Ukraine will end as ‘humiliating fiasco’ like ‘Vietnam and Afghanistan’

    Of course that Is what Russia says. They were hardly likely to say ‘That’‘s it, game over for us, we’re withdrawing all our troops now.’

    • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not to be a pedant but the US (and UK) armed and trained the mujahideen who largely went on to become the Taliban who oppressed their population and allowed al’qaeda to reside, train and plan attacks from within their borders which ultimately lead to the 9/11 attacks which precipitated a lengthy occupation by allied forces in which many more thousands died, and the eventual withdraw of said forces resulting in the Taliban taking back control, oppressing their population and no doubt once again providing a safe haven for terrorists aligned against the west.

      I would say that if Ukraine ends up “like afghanistan” it would be a very bad thing indeed for everyone. Russia, the west, Ukraine. Everyone.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        true. I just found it funny that they would compare that country given they abandoned it do to them being supplied by the US. Agreed though that it bit us. It was where stinger missiles gained fame.

  • Tebbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ukraine wants the help. Afghanistan didn’t. Also, the Soviet Union did a similar thing in Afghanistan.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Afghani’s did want the help. They just didn’t want someone else telling them what they should do … again.

  • ganksy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh well I guess we’ll just take our ball and go home then/s. Jokes on you, we freakin live for failure!