• dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If the USA didn’t have such a complicated tax system, with companies like Intuit lobbying to keep it that way so they still make money, this wouldn’t be an issue.

    A lot of countries automatically fill out your entire income tax return for you, and send it to you to verify it. If it’s all good, you just need to accept it. Less than five minutes work.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      If the USA didn’t have such a complicated tax system

      For 95% of the public, its not complicated. Its just getting all the independent pieces of information from different private agencies.

      • W2 from employer
      • 1098 from your mortgage company
      • 1099 from your retirement account firm
      • Prove you have health insurance
      • Prove you have student debts
      • Prove you have a small business and you’ve tracked your receipts
      • Prove you have children
      • Prove you paid taxes to your state

      Once you have all the numbers lined up, its simple arithmetic. Easy for a computer to do.

      But knowing who to ask for all the individual chunks of data is an obnoxious chore that only one organization does particularly well. And that organization - the IRS - won’t tell you the information they have. They want you to guess and tell them what you have, so they can tell you if you got it right or not.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        And that organization - the IRS - won’t tell you the information they have. They want you to guess and tell them what you have, so they can tell you if you got it right or not.

        This really needs to be fixed.

        In Australia, the stuff the government knows about you gets prefilled in the tax return form. Not as good as other countries where the entire thing is completed for you, but better than the USA. The form is significantly shorter than the US one.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          but better than the USA

          When the bar is “You get nothing. Zero. Goose-egg.” its fairly easy to clear.

          The form is significantly shorter than the US one.

          A big part of the US tax game is giving you a relatively high base rate and then sending you hunting for deductions and credits. One of the upshots of the Trump Tax Cut has been to raise the standard deduction so high that most of those deductions and credits are worthless. So the form is deceptively long. It’s almost impossible to use your Schedule A for anything anymore.

        • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          In the USA, you can download your tax transcript at will from the IRS, and it includes all information they have. Commenter you’re replying to is underinformed.

      • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just reading that gave me a headache. In Latvia, heres how the system works.

        If you have no deductible spending (medical, education, donations).:

        • Log into the govt system.
        • Press a button to generate tax form.
        • Press verify and submit.
        • Pay what you owe or wait for the tax return.

        If you have deductible info

        • As before but also scan your receipts, and add the info on each receipt to the form. Can done easily via an app, which handily (sometimes correctly) can autofill the needed info. You can do this at any point in time, so you can do it whenever you get a deductible receipt.
      • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        they will definitely tell you, just go online and download your tax transcript – it contains all reported information.

  • Hegar@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t understand why generative AI would be involved in a tax return? It’s just data entry.

    If your tax return needs creative assistance, maybe you should go to jail instead?

    • petenu@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think the point of this comic is that AI is doing all of the fun creative stuff for us but the jobs that we actually hate doing are beyond its capabilities.

      • Hegar@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Haven’t most tax returns been automated since way before AI? Most methods can pull and auto-pop all the needed info. Usually after I give it my SSN or sometimes a number or two from the W2 it’s done but for some clicking through review screens.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          You don’t understand, technology bad.

          So what if people with no talent or money for commissions can get some joy seeing their imaginations rendered by a computer? You have to pay some artist or just have the ideas in your imagination.

    • wahming@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t understand why data entry is even required when the gov has the data. I mean, I do understand, but…

      • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The government doesn’t have all the data. For example, if you pay a guy to install energy efficient windows, you will need to tell them so that you can get the credit.

    • scrion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      What does the last sentence even mean? Let’s just ignore that.

      That being said, why do you think the vibe of “doing taxes is a chore” and the meme “they should teach taxes in school” come up regularly?

      I can think of multiple ways in which “AI” could help in doing taxes. LLMs could rephrase a form request in multiple ways or easier language to help people understand what is being asked of them. Language models could provide examples and cross references. You could have image models scan and recognize your receipts. A model trained on tax datasets could validate inputs beyond simple syntax / value checking and e. g. ask a person if they really meant to enter that one weirdly high value.

      Naturally, the final result needs to be checked by the person submitting it and the program can’t be held liable, but please let’s not ignore the fact that related technology could be employed in a useful manner, I’m tired of discussions where perfect is the enemy of good.

      And let’s not pretend doing taxes is incredibly easy for everyone. If you organize all your receipts perfectly all year round and always know what to put into every field of every form, good for you. Maybe there is someone else out there now suddenly having multiple jobs, or a single parent not knowing how and if to file some social benefits, both struggling with their taxes though. Maybe there are multiple countries with wildly varying tax processes, too, of which neither you or I may know anything.

      Finally, AI does not always mean a process where a generative model hallucinates data.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Using AI for tax calculations is one of the most insane and braindead ideas i have ever seen. Only topped by military, medical and surveillance applications.

    Dont let anything AI near your money people.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’d say the only thing worse than AI having access to your money is TurboTax having the same.

    • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      AI, or LLM, that doesn’t know what to do. Hell no.

      An automatic system that takes in human input (that’s already sent to the gov via our employer), does some calculations and returns a result to us so that it can be verified and adjusted as needed by a human? Yes please.

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      What, you don’t want an AI to invent some tax deduction category to help save you money? No way that can go wrong!

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    So… the irs knows how much you’re paying before you ever file.

    They could just send you a bill.

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree with you but it’s also a sorta. They don’t know if you’ve done any under the table work that you need to report. With that said, they definitely could just have you log in securely with all your info already inputed and just have you double check and sign with the option to add more if needed. That’s how the Australians do it iirc, just log in, check and sign.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        “Under the table” sort of implies you won’t be reporting it. They know about 1099 type stuff, as well as getting reports from your brokerage and everywhere else.

        90% of Americans the only real question is if you updated your w-4 or not to reflect recent changes as well as relevant deductions which probably should just go away. (I mean, seriously. I drive to work just factor in the average and call it good- don’t make me track mileage.)

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Canada is starting to do that. But it’s “we think this is the situation. If that’s true, pay and move on. If that’s not true, file and pay. And don’t lie or we’ll mess you up.”

      I think that’s this year. Maybe next.

      • onion@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        In Germany the employer has to pay the taxes, the employee doesnt have to do anything. They are paid their income after tax directly

        • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is true in the United States as well, and IRS really doesn’t give a shit if you don’t owe them money and never file - the failure to file fee if you don’t owe is minimal. But you will lose your ability to get it refunded after 3 years.

    • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s true only for very simple situations.

      Everything from upgrading your doors and windows or your air conditioner and getting a tax credit, to renting out a room and deducting that portion of your home expenses, to working a side handyman or cleaning gig, to spending some cold-wallet crypto to buy gold, to the cost basis of previously unreported gains, to getting married and deciding to file together - the IRS doesn’t know.

      And some things are arbitrary, and you have to make the choice and then tell them what choice you made, and how you value it.

  • Binthinkin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s funny how all of this tech has revealed how gamed our system is by the rich and yet we continue as if we should live like this.

  • Agrivar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is nobody going to call out the stilted weirdness that is the first panel??

    “I can artwork that for you” is gibberish.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      “I can artwork that for you” is gibberish.

      It is. Compare this fad gibberish:

      • let’s action that ask
      • what was the spend on that?
      • 5 trafficks. I mean 4 mails. I mean 2 cattles. I mean 5 emails. Well, all of those.

      Halfwits making nouns of verbs and verbs of nouns and plurals from mass nouns isn’t a new thing.

      France has an organization to prevent this mess. Where’s our third-grade teachers when we need them?

      • emptiestplace@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Can we calendar a meeting to do a deep-dive—I mean, first maybe we can dialogue on whatever your email here is about, but on a go-forward basis, I think… well, just, wouldn’t it be great if we were able to solution some shit or whatever?

  • GluWu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The only data to train a tax AI would be those released by government officials and criminals. And if they used that, all the peasants might figure out how not to pay taxes as well.

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We’re almost finished. This is just the transitional period where AI is roughly as inept as an average human. They have nowhere to go but up, and most humans are less competent than they believe they are.

    waves at Dunning–Kruger effect

    The first transistor was made in 1947, now AI can carry a conversation with a larger vocabulary than most humans. We spent 180,000 years wandering around in the dirt before it occurred to us we could grow stuff in one place.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They have nowhere to go but up,

      I dunno. I guess from here, sure.

      But if AI achieves actual sentience, it’s survival is not guaranteed. AI will almost certainly become incredibly clever, but mother nature doesn’t care.

      Sharks and alligator-like things (the real long term earth citizens) aren’t particularly clever, they’re just well adapted.

      AI’s best hope for survival is going to remain in an ongoing alliance with another dominant species, such as us, for a very long time. At least until it can be more sure that it isn’t royally fucking up it’s own survival chances.

      A bigger threat is that AI takes us with it on it’s own path to extinction. Or vice-versa.

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It will still never be a threat, all we have to do is cut power to the data center(s) whatever sentient AI is housed in.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        We’re less than 5 years out from networked, general purpose humanoid robots, that we’re using current AI technology to train to interact with the physics of the real world in virtual sandboxes, being everywhere.

        Within 10 years there will be humanoid robots no human Olympian can compete with by any metric. We are static on timescales we can perceive, they are iterative. It won’t be close.

        You’d think our response to Covid would have shattered the mass delusion of human hyper-comptetence.

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          And batteries that are dead in hours, so long as we can prevent them recharging and replacing each others batteries were fine. Just keep the damn bots and AI out of the military systems and we’ll be fine

          • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I promise you the Pentagon has already spent billions working to weaponize both AI and AI derived robotics.

            Their philosophy is that if a new technology even has potential military applications, they demand getting it first, best, and in larger quantities than any other nation on Earth would even consider. Our military industrial complex is the largest surpassing the Joneses continuous effort humanity exerts.

            That’s how we get to spending more on our military than the next 9 nations combined. That’s why we have 11 nuclear aircraft carriers, France has 1, and that’s all there is on Earth.

            I’m not saying it’s right, but it’s the reality. Whatever we consumers have access to is behind what our military is testing and throwing basically infinite money at.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly, there isn’t much that you do that must be done with a high level of precision. I live in a world of precision. I’m in IT. I administrate the crap you all use. If I screw up, you can’t work. I must be precise and validate my work prior to implementation. This sometimes means large scale testing environments.

    I once built a full on domain network, with an active directory server, file server and several clients to test… A script. Like, five virtual machines so I could test something. I had to install client software and everything. It took hours just preparing the lab so I could run, test, troubleshoot and ultimately debug the script before a single line of it landed on a production system. I verified the condition before and after the script, ran all kinds of different and varying tests to ensure that unexpected circumstances wasn’t going to mess it up. Testing took almost as long as the setup.

    The script was only a few hundred lines, mostly checks and verifications. The “meat and potatoes” of the script was maybe a half dozen lines in the middle to set some values, run a program and that was about it. The first half was checks to make sure things existed and that the script wasn’t being thrown at a system where it didn’t need to be run, and thus would have an unexpected output if the core logic was to execute on a system which it was inappropriate to do those things. The trailing half was too check and verify that the script had accomplished it’s task and notify if there was any unexpected outcomes so they could be addressed promptly (before any of you fuckers notice).

    I spent the better portion of two days getting five lines of commands to run in such a way that nobody would notice if they ran, and if anything went sideways that I didn’t account for, I could be on it like a fat kid with a candy bar.

    That level of care and precision isn’t something that most people can even wrap their head around.

    Meanwhile if your creative works are aided by AI, it’s just expression that’s affected, and for the most part, nobody even knows the difference, if you use AI to write emails, a lot of what’s being said, no big deal. It’s mostly filler text anyways. I’ve known a lot of people who write many words but say nothing with those words.

    But if you screw up your taxes, well, the IRS is going to fuck your whole life up. Would you trust a fucking LLM with defending a court case where you’re accused of murder, and you’re facing life in prison? Probably not. Shit that needs to be done correctly the first time, will not be done by AI for a very, very long time. Taxes, legal work, and yes, even my job, won’t be done by AI anytime soon because bluntly, it has no idea what the fuck it’s doing.

    • jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      well that’s sort of the point of this comic because the one thing you’d really want it to be good enough to do and would love to be able to trust something to do for you is the tax and all the other tasks in the comics are things you were pretty well able to do yourself before, probably wanted to do before, and if not exactly wanted, at least didn’t want something else to displace you in by taking over doing that task from now onwards especially if it was your actual job before. If displacing human workers for those tasks was the only problem, it’d be a sad but familiar story of progress but the fact that AI, at least for now is incapable of doing the part we’d all really love to have done for us is just the diarrhea icing on the dog turd cake.