With the lastest news of AI layoffs, I’m struggling to understand how the idea of a career still holds. If careers themselves effectively become gambles like lottery tickets, how do we maintain drive and hopes in the longterm endgame of our struggles?

I know AI as an honest utility is itself a lie to some extent, but this only aids my argument further. People’s career struggles are panning out to be valueless because of a nothing-fad that no one could have predicted.

        • jbrains@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          You are very wrong about that, but I still never fired me. 🤷‍♂️

          UPDATE: Downvoted for admitting that I, too, have battled severe clinical depression. Well done.

          • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I want to know who goes around giving a single downvote to entirely personal and uncontroversial comments. Happens to almost every single one of my comments. I’d rather have five or ten downvotes than just one. I dunno, I know I shouldn’t let it bother me, but it does.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Some jobs will be very difficult to replace with AI. People who can do so will try to flock to those. Personally, I think the only peaceful way forward will require UBI. Without that, sharpen the guillotines.

    • applepie@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Children… Every generation they need to learn the hard time that this is how it always has been!

      I don’t blame them, but you would think their parents who went throught this would try to educate their own kids. But most either too stupid to figure it out or too naive or just plain old bootlickes…

      So here we are, generation in, generation out slaving to make somebody else wealthy.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    What is life but a lottery?

    A lot of the drive towards AI is people thinking to save a quick buck, but longer term that places them in a very unsteady position themselves.

    All products end up being for “shareholder value”, and AI will be no different. Someone will find an enshittification vector and run with it.

    Suddenly, that “quick buck” becomes a monthly subscription that costs more than the people fired. Company data is harvested and sold, customers are advertised out, the shittiness of the system becomes a company problem.

    So we’re either going to see a stark change away from the current shareholder value model (about as likely as world peace), or we’re going to see a lot of CEO seppuku. Win win really.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Welcome back to blue collar, boys. Just keep it union so no one gets fucked on pay.

    Despite all the AI and robotics, semi trucks will probably stay manned at least another 20 years, manual construction of houses and building will still be around for another 25 years, welders (non mass production) like building and piping will be around for quite some time, auto mechanics, and Healthcare workers, hvac techs, electricians, plumbers, construction, mailman, airline pilots (at least passenger airline), gun for hire, firefighter, police, emt/paramedic, and MORE.

    There’s a lot of jobs that aren’t even close to being phased out. It’s just that most of them involve you actually not sitting on your butt all day.

  • rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I think in the next time it’s mostly the unskilled and office jobs. I think we still have a shortage of skilled IT professionals and people who can do more than webdevelopment and write simple python scripts. And we also have a shortage of teachers, kindergarden teachers, people who care for the elderly, doctors, psychologists. And despite AI creeping into all the fields, I still see a career there for quite some time to come. Also I don’t see an AI plumber anytime soon coming around and fixing your toilet. So I’d say handyman is a pretty safe bet.

    But I’d say all the people making career decisions right now better factor that in. Joining a call center is probably not a sustainable decision any more. And some simple office or management jobs will become redundant soon. I just think big tech laying off IT professionals is more an artificially inflated bubble bursting, than AI being now able to code complex programs or do the job of an engineer.

    It’s not really a gamble. We know what AI can do. And there are lists with predictions which jobs can be automated. We can base our decisions on that and I’ve seen articles in the newspapers 10 years ago. They’re not 100% accurate but a rough guide… For example we still have a shortage of train operators. And 10 years ago people said driving trains on rails is easy to automate and we shouldn’t strive for that career anymore.

    It’ll likely get there. But by that time society will have changed substantially. We can watch Star Trek if we’re talking about a post-scarcity future and all the hard work is done for us. We’d need universal income for that. Or we end up in a dystopia. But I think that’s to uncertain to base decisions on.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Saying AI is a nothing fad makes you sound like a boomer in the late 90’s and early 00’s talking about the internet. It is definitely not a fad. It will affect 80% of all jobs on the planet over the next 10 years.

      • aasatru@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Is it possible that I miss out on valuable insights by immediately dismissing the opinions of anyone who refers to machine learning as AI?

        Sure.

        Will I stop doing it?

        Sure as hell not.

        • AlexanderESmith@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Indeed. Though that’s only my surface level complaint.

          On a deeper level; LLMs just fuckin’ suck ass. They aren’t people, stop assuming they can do things that people can do.

          • Fubber Nuckin'@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t think they suck ass as long as you understand their limitations, but everyone seems to expect them to be able to fully replace human thought and uh, yeah they’re pretty bad if that’s your goal.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’ll be dismissing the vast majority of experts in the fields. The only people who refuse to call it AI are those who think AI refers to the stuff you see in sci-fi movies. The ones doing the work and who actually know what they’re talking about use AI to mean even the simplest thing like a bunch of if statements that make up a hard-coded decisions tree.

          • aasatru@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Artificial intelligence. There’s nothing intelligent going on in an LLM model. There’s learning, but not intelligence.

            The people objecting to the use of the term AI to describe computerized parrots are the people who think intelligence still matters as a concept.

            • howrar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Right, so if that’s the discussion you care about, that’s totally fair. Most researchers I know couldn’t give a rat’s ass what you call it as long as there’s something to call it. I think we’ve all long accepted that no two person will have the same idea of what intelligence means.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Many of those boomers retired comfortably without ever learning the slightest bit of computer literacy. Even now, plenty of jobs require little-to-none.

      Furthermore, we are in the “dotcom bubble” stage of “AI”. The people least knowledgeable about it are the ones throwing billions of dollars at whoever claims to “use AI” for literally anything. We are on, (or maybe for those of us who are paying attention, right after), the Peak of Inflated Expectations.

      Trough of disillusionment dot jpeg


      Remember when 5-ish years ago all anyone would talk about in the tech space is how being a truck driver would be an obsolete job in the near future? I remember.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I do hope we hit the trough of disillusionment and stay there for a good long while, because we don’t have any safety nets in place for the billions of people who will be impacted, but who knows. Business owners certainly don’t give a fuck.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    The best reason to try is not based on the chance of success.

    The best reason to try is that it hurts less than doing nothing.

    When you’re active, life hurts less. This is the most rational reason I have found, in my 40 years of searching, for getting out of bed in the morning.

    Finding motivation is a hard problem for me. The most consistent source I’ve found is the understanding that giving up does not bring relief. It brings hell.

  • Hackworth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    A.I. is likely going to change the world as much as the printing press (at the very least, and possibly as much as the industrial revolution). I wouldn’t call it a nothing fad. It is definitely shaking up my career (video production) already. And at least from my point of view, becoming a creative generalist is the best way to adapt. Work is going to become more about knowing a little to moderate amount about a whole lot of things, so that you can effectively orchestrate a hierarchy of AI agents. Deep specialization increasingly carries too much risk, and the A.I. are much better at some aspects of it than we typically are.

    • Emmie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Finally time for my adhd to shine, I can do so many things but suck at all of em

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is going to be a fucking painful transition - I daresay its going to be one of the most painful transitions in history… but the solution is social upheaval. I can’t tell you when it will fire but I doubt we’ll ever see 20% unemployment in developed countries so probably sometime when we’re in the mid-teens. It’s unlikely we’re going to see a voluntary solution to wealth inequality so shit will get violent and it’ll suck for everyone.

    The AI revolution will take a while to come to fruition and it will require a lot of oversight initially, but we’ll gradually scale back the oversight and concentrate a few areas of the economy into extremely few hands (sort of like what’s happened with tech giants)… eventually we’ll hit the breaking point and hopefully we’ll come out the far side with an equitable post-scarcity economy. If you’re lucky you’ll be dead by then though because it’s going to fucking suck but, inevitably, either the wealthy will lose or we’ll go extinct.

  • dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    You need people who actually know what is going on, and you need people to replace them when they get too old or senile. Because AI is being shoved everywhere, but it is basically a VC scam. Turn yourself into the solution to that one problem that AI can’t solve.

  • nihilvain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I predict that “career” as we know it today will disappear shortly. We will have to change careers every 5 to 10 years. Depending on where the wind is blowing from and if there will be any vacant jobs. Being an expert in a field will not have much of a value as that expertise will be stolen by AI during one’s employment anyway. What can be helpful in this dystopia waiting for us would be analytic problem solving skills, creativity, constant learning and curiosity. But no matter what, we will all end up with minimum wage.

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    4 Ps.

    Pimps: operators of the gray and black market. Immune to automation since companies that can hire developers don’t want to be involved.

    Prostitutes: people who provide a service that clients do not want automated.

    Professionals: highly educated, very skilled. Automation just makes them go faster.

    Project Managers: people who deal with the gestalt of legal/political/technical/institutional debt. They can’t be replaced since you can’t yell at an AI and expect them to just “fix it already”.

    There is overlap. Live music and much of the service industry. But as a general rule you pick one of the four and you should be fine.

    It’s interesting that you say no one could have predicted this. Labor saving devices are not exactly new.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    In my field, I’ve seen how computers have changed work and I expect AI to just be a continuation of it. The people who generally get replaced are the skilled labor and the unskilled professionals. I expect that trend will continue as AI gets integrated into the field. Even then, there is still going to be a lot of work regarding verification.

    • nihilvain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The thing is; now it doesn’t matter if your job has been done properly by AI or not, what matters is that it’s just cheaper. And when all companies jump on this bandwagon of enshittification for profit it becomes the standard. This already happened with customer support. It’s nearly impossible to get a human when you call for support. All customers hate it, make their life harder. But still all companies do it and with no alternative you just have to accept it. From what I see, the adoption to AI happens in two ways: either you want to make your human driven processes better by utilizing AI or for cheaper with AI but with ‘passable’ quality. And it looks like companies are mostly in the second camp. So I don’t think besides some exceptional cases and industries the quality of work will be a determining factor.