• Blastboom Strice@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Kinda wondering if you’d get different results for using a different display (especially of different technology)

    This what I got from two consecutive tests anyways (weird that the percentage is different)

    Your boundary is at hue 168, greener than 81% of the population. For you, turquoise is blue.

    Your boundary is at hue 168, greener than 85% of the population. For you, turquoise is blue.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      I got 176 on both phone and monitor.

      The percentage is based on how many people have used the thing, so if it is suddenly popular and a lot more runs are completed it can shift the percentage.

      • Blastboom Strice@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        The percentage is based on how many people have used the thing, so if it is suddenly popular and a lot more runs are completed it can shift the percentage.

        Ohh now it makes sense, thanks

    • Shoot, I got significantly different results from two consecutive tests on the same device. I suspect the sequence of colors affects perception, too.

      In my first run, I perceived greater differences between the sequential colors and I got a couple that were in the extremes, and got around 65% (I don’t recall the hue number). The second run, many colors were only a little different from their predecessors, and I didn’t get any really obviously blue or green - they were all subtle variations of turquoise, and I scored at 76% (177).

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depending on how shit your screen is, you’ll even get a different result depending on how far above or below you it is.

      My IPS is fine, my cheap LCD second screen shows a gradient from green to cyan for most of it.

      That screen cost me a whopping £30 from CEX. They said it had dead pixels on one side, but on closer inspection, it appears to be either ink or blood.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s a CEX in a small town.

          I’m not assuming anything other than whatever money was handed over by the store for this thing was rapidly exchanged for the smallest available quantity of heroin from a local dealer.

  • Jakylla@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Your boundary is at hue 175, bluer than 65% of the population. For you, turquoise is green.

    Actually hard, because I use to distinguish Cyan from Green and Blue, so categorizing it to either blue or green was a bit difficult

      • Jakylla@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yup, maybe because of computer graphics; I tend to consider Cyan, Turquoise and Teal as some kind of synonyms (or really similar to eachother); ususally I call it when there is almost as much green as blue “Cyan”

        When looking at definitions, there are not the same colors, but are still all different shades of Green and Blue (I don’t personnaly recognize them well, so I consider them with the same name; like people call them Green or Blue here)

        My rainbow wheel be like: Red - Orange - Yellow - Green - Cyan - Blue - Purple - Magenta - Red

        Like for the pixels on your screen are RGB = Red, Green & Blue; and the paint in Inkjet printers are CYMK (Cyan, Yellow, Magenta, blacK)

        • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          If you start out with the primaries and keep mixing to get the hues between you’ll end up with 6, then 12, and then 24 hues at the quaternary level. Orange is a tertiary color with it’s opposite being Azure.

          • Jakylla@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            According to your website, teal would be a darker shade of Cyan

            Teal, #008080: https://www.canva.com/colors/color-meanings/teal/

            And by what I read #30D5C8, so Turquoise is a nuance near to Cyan, but grayer/desaturated (there is a bit of red), and a bit more towards green than blue (D5 > C8)

            Cyan/Teal (darker cyan) are the true middle between Green & Blue, with exactly as much green as blue in it

            • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              According to your website, teal would be a darker shade of Cyan

              Hmm… By just the numeric hex code, I agree, that makes sense. Just lowering the G and B values makes it darker. However, lowering BOTH G and B lowers B twice, since G can be broken into Y and B by color theory, so blue is removed proportionately more. So, somewhat disagree.

              I still don’t think Teal and Cyan are the same. I’d say Teal and Turquoise are closer, in my eyes. I think Teal is darker Turquoise moreso than it’s darker Cyan.

              But at the end, color is all subjective.

              • Jakylla@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yeah, exactly that kind of nuancing problem, that make me tell Cyan/Turquoise/Teal as “the same color” in everyday use (and for my fellows French people, that do not use to use Turquoise or Cyan words in everyday life, I use to say “Blue-Green”; but I don’t like to call these nuances either “Blue” or “Green”, as nobody never agrees depending on the nuance, and that makes awkward situations)

          • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            The issue with the term light blue is that people think of light as being warmer and green tends to have a higher chromatic luminance. A true “light blue” would actually be periwinkle as it’s the tint of primary blue.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Your boundary is at hue 185, bluer than 94% of the population. For you, turquoise is green.

      Funny because I what I call turquoise is what I call blue. The example they gave was too green in my mind.

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    Test is flawed. Does not allow for demilitarized zone between blue and green!

    This leads to blueward expansion by green and a preemptive war by blue!

  • brb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Your boundary is at hue 192, bluer than 98% of the population. For you, turquoise is green.

    You all need to get your eyes checked

  • hades@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    30 years on the internet, never seen so many people being wrong.

  • just_chill@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    J’ai fait le test et je trouverais intéressant de le refaire en changeant la luminosité/clareté des tons. Pour les tons clairs, dans le doute je choisi bleu, mais c’est possible que je fasse pas pareil pour les tons foncés.

    • inlandempire@jlai.luOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ouais je pense que le calibrage de l’écran joue beaucoup aussi, sur mon pc les trois dernières couleurs étaient les mêmes à mes yeux, à cause de mon écran un peu nul

      • just_chill@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Tout le monde cite le calibrage, mais je suis bien plus interessé par la perception perso. Je sais même pas si ça se calibre un écran d’ordiphone.

        • inlandempire@jlai.luOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Très bonne question, mais pour la perception je pense qu’il y a une part d’apprentissage culturel !

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    our boundary is at hue 176, bluer than 75% of the population. For you, turquoise is green.
    Je distingue ce que j’appelle en français, le bleu turquoïse et le vert turquoïse. Dans mon langage, c’est là que ce trouve la frontière entre les bleus et les verts.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was bluer than 97%. I’m not color blind and never thought my color perception was anything other than average, before.

    • mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you did we both did, I hold no opinion on this matter like a true neutral you’ll never know where I stand on this debate!

    • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Cyan is specifically defined as the color halfway between green and blue. Is yellow red? Yellow has just as much green in it as Cyan.

  • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Doesn’t the intensity of blue fade over the life of most OLED displays? Couldn’t that skew the results?

    • tleb@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Monitor quality and calibration will always affect these sorts of things but your results are probably close enough to reality