• justsomeguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    2 months ago

    I for one appreciate that ubisoft chose the top down view of poop as their logo. it’s the perfect symbol for everything they represent and they’re incredibly brave for wearing it proudly on their chest.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yup. Millions subscribe to MMOs and Game Pass. Live service games like Genshin Impact and Fate/Grand Order are incredibly popular. There are also games with crazy intrusive DRM like kernel level spyware and always online DRM that are still installed by millions. How can you look at these stats and not think people are fine with paying for temporary games? If the game is good enough, players don’t care. Ubisoft’s problem is their games aren’t good enough.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    2 months ago

    Shareholders need to get confortable not owning the value of their share.
    Seriously, it in the name: they hold shares not their value.

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      They should also get comfortable paying taxes when the of their shares increases. (If only that were true…)

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      CEOs need to get comfortable with not existing.

      CEO at my job can’t even do the most menial task in the warehouse. Companies will be fine without their posh little darlings

  • Thann@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Shitty companies need to get used to loosing money

  • Glifted@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    I want to be optimistic that the industry will learn from these failures but they only ever seem to learn the wrong lessons

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      UbiSoft will fail and get bought up by Microsoft, who will have learned the exact opposite lesson because their stock price went up.

      Meanwhile, Larian will keep churning out bangers until someone eventually offers the owners a too-stupid-amount-of-money to turn down, and then it will be folded into the enshitificatio engine, too. Or they’ll release a flop, lose access to low-interest loans, and collapse under their own weight. Thus proving good games aren’t worth the risk to make.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The fact that so many people use Steam mean that gamers haven’t really learnt either. Some games are DRM-free on Steam, but a lot aren’t.

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep, after the bombing of Suicide Squad’s game, and Hogwarts selling 24 million units, Warner’s exec said they would still try to push live services.

  • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pretty sure their recent stock drop has more to do with them releasing a bad game based on a dying IP than on what an exec said months ago.

  • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    I call this “The curse of Might and Magic”. This franchise was established by Jon Van Caneghem who founded New World Computing. The company later got into financial trouble and was absorbed by 3DO. Over time (mainly due to the commercial failure of its console, which came after the acquisition of the M&M property), 3DO started slipping into the hole. It dissolved, and in its fire sale, Ubi purchased the rights to Might and Magic. The rest, as they say, is history…

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      So, it’s the Hope Diamond of Computer Game IPs?

      They better sell that IP to The Smithsonian.

      BTW what do we have to pay an entry fee to The Smithsonian, and The British Museum is free to anyone that can make it there? Seems like something our taxes should be taking care of…

      • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Unless they changed something in the last year or so, all the Smithsonian buildings in DC have free admission.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh good! I just remember the last time I was in DC, I had to pay admission. That was in the mid '90s so, I’m guessing they managed to fix that later.

      • hydreno@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Generally The Smithsonian locations are free to enter. Some parts cost extra like the butterfly room at the natural History one.

        A quick Google says the only one that does cost anything is the Cooper Hewitt in New York.