• NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Do public schools not teach keyboarding anymore? I ask because I had a keyboarding classe two-hrs 1day per week in grade school plus a full class one year in 7th grade and then again for a full year in high school, and they were always taught by some of the oldest teachers in the school. -My high-school teacher started his career teaching typewriter typing something like three or four decades prior to teaching me in 2004. It seems strange that new young people aren’t getting that same basic education.

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      We didn’t have specific typing class but we had IT in both primary and secondary, at least late gen z got plenty of computer time in school and most I know in my generation are decent typists at least

    • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      When I was a kid they taught penmanship too. I was awful at it but then when I was an adult I had a job where I actually had to use those skills and I was glad to have them - same with everything I learned in Home Ec, most the stuff I learned in wood/metal/auto shop, etc. I think all of those classes are extinct now, based on how people talk about school never teaching them anything useful.

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Gen X here. Honestly, I was a shit typer until I got a keyboard for my sega dreamcast and bought “Typing of the dead”.

    I went from hunt and peck to well over 100wpm.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Typing of the dead

      Still my favorite example of gamification: take a useful task and make it so fun that people will gladly devote hours and hours of their time to it.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I didn’t know I was learning a life skill at the time. I was having such a good time playing and wanted to get better and better. I guess this sorta holds true for any sport.

        My girlfriend (wife now) at the time also played with me using two keyboards. She types over 120wpm.

  • tunetardis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    As a Gen X, I think my typing speed peaked around late high school/early university? I tried to teach myself touch typing and got moderately proficient. Then I got into programming where you need to reach all of those punctuation marks. So my right hand has drifted further to the right over the years, which is better for code but suboptimal for regular text.

    One thing that’s really tanked for me though is writing in cursive. I used to be able to take notes in class as fast as the prof could speak. Now I can scarcely sign my own name.

  • dragonlobster@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    The physical keyboard is just a tool. There are alternatives like speech-to-text software, virtual keyboards with swipe features, or stenotype.

    The goal should be to use whatever is most effective and efficient for yourself, so if Gen Zrs are more used to touch screen, maybe they should invent a touch screen interface that you can use with the computer, maybe even incorporating the mouse somehow.

    For me personally the touch interfaces right now are fucked up - I always tap the wrong letters on my phone, the auto-correct and suggestions used to compensate for this often times make it even worse, and swipe doesn’t come up with the words I want, I often have to swipe multiple times. I can’t imagine operating a computer like this, but maybe for Gen Zrs it’s no problem.

    Maybe in the future you just need to think the word and it appears on the screen, and typing would be obsolete.

    • mwguy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The goal should be to use whatever is most effective and efficient for yourself,

      And if taught as they should be, that will be the keyboard.

      Counting out 5*5 on your fingers works and might be the fastest way you’ve been taught to multiply, but that doesn’t mean we should excuse schools not teaching times tables and how to use a caluclator.

    • piccolo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Keyboards exist the way they are because typewriters did it that way for nearly 150 years, and had to be that way because they are a mechanical device. We havent even changed the design of PC keyboards since IBM basically perfected it in the 80s. Theres probably a lot of room to improve the keyboard, but we dont because simply its already a refined invention and fimilar. For example, qwerty made sense on a mechanical device, but it makes zero sense on an electronic device. But familiarity keeps people on qwerty. Funny enough, this effects touch keyboards too.

    • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      As a Gen Z, I just don’t get it. One-off message, note or comment is fine. But have you never happened to have a long-ish conversation while on your phone? You get tired soon and want to go for a normal-sized physical keyboard.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    By the time the generation after them get to working age, somebody will have invented the Swype keyboard for office use.

    It will always be in uppercase unless you press the “no cap” button.

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Man look at millennials turning into boomers at record pace

      “back in my day we did things properly, now all these damn kids… etc etc”

      • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        it’s not becoming boomers. It’s about rarely meeting one who knows that, for example, wifi is not the internet. I’m not asking for detailed tech knowledge. But getting a blank face if asked something as simple as “where did you save the file?” or replying with “in the gallery/google photos” means you are not tech savvy. these are the absolute basics.

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          What’s your sample size, do you actually talk to many gen z

          If you asked them where they saved a photo on a smartphone they’re not going to tell you a filepath because that’s not how people use smartphones. I probably couldn’t tell you where photos are stored physically on my phone without going out of my way to find that info

          Also Google photos is a valid answer to that question because the file is saved in Google photos, just because it’s cloud storage doesn’t make it not storage. In that case local storage is basically just a cache anyway

          • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            because that’s not how a phone is used.

            But it is how any phone/desktop/laptop pollworks. So you’re proving my point. Most can’t even tell if the file they want is on the device in the first place, if they use stuff like cloud backups. To those people, the file is “in google”. Not tech savvy

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      You would think they know how to use a browser but in reality they only use apps. TikTok being their preferred search engine speaks volumes.

    • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think for the most part they are just “good” at using mainstream social medias nothing really more

  • bebabalula@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    There’s a common misconception among boomers and gen x that “digital natives” like gen z have a god-given tech proficiency. However, there’s nothing about being born with a smartphone in your hand that teaches you anything about tech.

    It’s not like people are getting better at changing oil as car ownership becomes more common, right?

    • Branquinho@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think “digital naive” is a better phrase than “digital native”. They are born with computers all around them. But most adults forget to / are not able to educate them about technology and their implications.

      • eleitl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I call them digital savages. You wouldn’t ask a jungle tribe about the Krebs cycle either.

      • Disaster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I believe it’s a little more sinister than that. There is less education around these issues because many services have adopted a highly polished, “Walled-Garden” approach to their presentation. This keeps people who’ve grown up with the concepts in their walled garden loyal to that specific service, and makes it difficult for people to dig under the hood and work out how things really function without the sugar coating. They get irritated quickly because they’re used to everything “Just working” and don’t have experience on more open systems.

        Therefore, they would like there to be no need for tech education unless you plan on a professional career as a tech.

        As long as ownserhip don’t get carried away with enshittification chasing next quarter’s finance call and drive users away by annoying them into putting the extra effort in to learning about alternatives, they could keep it that way forever.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Note that to some extent, this might have been a necessary step in the relative popularity of computing.

          Folks remembering how flexible and open ended things were in the 90s were a tiny sliver of the population. At the time about 1% of the world were participating in the internet, now the majority of the population participates on the internet.

          I would have loved for the industry to keep up the trends of the 90s (AOL/Prodigy lost out to a federated internet, centralized computing yielded to personal computing) instead of going backwards (enduser devices becoming tethered to internet hosted software, relatively few internet domains and home hosted sites being considered suspicious rather than normal), but this might have just been what it took for the wider population to be able to cope.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Gen X and older witnessed a young generation born into kind of working, but kind of janky technology. They saw kids figure out obscure VCR programming interfaces that let the kids record something they wanted, but only by navigating very obtuse interface rendered exclusively with 7 segment displays with a few extra static indicators. A teenager playing that new DOS game, but first they had to struggle with getting the conventional memory, upper memory, EMS/XMS and just the right set of TSRs running, involving mucking about with menu driven config.sys/autoexec.bat tailored for their use cases. Consumer electronics and computers of the time demanded a steep learning curve, but they could still do magic, leading to the trope in the 80s and 90s media of tech wonder kids doing awesome stuff way better than the adults. Even if you have a super advanced submarine and very smart people, you needed your teenager computer kid to outclass everyone.

      By now, we’ve made high res touch screens that can be embedded in everything for cheap, and embedded systems that would be the envy of a pretty high end desktop from the year 2000, which was capable of running more friendly operating environments. The rather open ended internet has largely baked in how the participants get to play. The most common devices lock down what the user can do, because the user can’t be trusted not to break themselves with malware.

      The end result is that we may have the same proportion of people with the deep technical skills, but a lot of people are now unimpressed. In the mid 90s, less than 1 percent of the population had direct internet experience, and by 2008, 25% had that experience. So even if you still have 1% of really tech savvy people, there’s over 24x as many non savvy people that don’t need to marvel at those savvy people because they are getting about what they want out of it.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Oh, I remember my childhood and how everybody (and sadly myself) considered us so knowledgeable because we sit chatting via ICQ, writing stupid shit in forum text RPGs, playing WarCraft III, Perfect World, IL2, KotOR and X-Wing Alliance all day.

    • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The boomers says that to them but that’s really not true, this day this generation is less and less “tech savvy”, they’re just good at using the basic way social media

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yes.

      Calling GenZ tech savvy for always using a cell phone is like calling grandma a mathematician because she spends all day at the slot machine.

  • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    My class never had typing classes in school. Our IT lessons were very limited.
    My current style is a hybrid of sort of blind typing based on pc gaming (you cant hunt for keys in a match) and looking for keys using about 4-8 fingers.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    How would you learn keyboard typing, if one always types on the phone?! (I am not even Z and have to look on the keyboard)

  • ian@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Not being fast at typing does not mean you are not tech savvy. There is more to tech than typing. Like an architect doesn’t need to be good at brick-laying to be a good architect.