Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoStand your groundslrpnk.netimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1628arrow-down14
arrow-up1624arrow-down1imageStand your groundslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoLotters? Is this some vernacular I’m unfamiliar with?
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoThey attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
minus-squareTypotyper@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 months agoOr “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoThat’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
Lotters? Is this some vernacular I’m unfamiliar with?
It says, in fact, LOπERS.
LOPIERS
WILL BE SH∞T ON SIGHT
They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
What’s a loiter?
That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.