It was only in 1969 (nice) that fungi officially became its own separate kingdom.

  • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I overheard someone talking about veganism and said they only eat plants. I asked them about mushrooms, “of course it’s fine, those are plants”.
    No amount of convincing worked.

    So I’ve seen it once.

  • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Pluto is a planet, though. It’s officially considered a “dwarf” planet, and as “dwarf” is just an adjective, it’s still a planet (just like a short person is still a person). The other 8 new dwarf planets (Ceres, Eris, Makemake, Haumea, Gonggong, Quaoar, Orcus, and Sedna) are also all planets - so we have 17 planets total.

    Seriously, though. By the same 3 criteria that Pluto isn’t a planet, Mercury isn’t (as it isn’t in hydrostatic equilibrium).

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think an issue here is that taxonomic and colloquial definitions don’t always agree.

    Spiders are colloquially bugs, but they’re not taxonomically “true bugs” (which is itself a colloquialism for Hemiptera). Tomatos are colloquially vegetables but taxonomically fruits…but afaik vegetable is a purely colloquial term anyway.

    And as someone else in the thread mentioned, colloquial berries are not always taxonomic berries.

    So…colloquially, “plants” sorta means, “macroscopic multicellular living non-animal thing,” but taxonomically it’s something else.

    • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you’re talking about tomatoes, the difference is the context, and it isn’t a choice between colloquial vs scientific taxonomy, but between culinary/nutritional vs botany/taxonomy (and). You can talk about either in a colloquial context or a formal context, though generally there isn’t much reason to talk about botany in a colloquial setting.

      From a nutritional perspective, mushrooms are generally considered vegetables, too.

      afaik vegetable is a purely colloquial term anyway.

      I thought you were wrong but I looked it up and I appear to have been mistaken. It makes “tomatoes are fruits, not vegetables” sound nonsensical, as it implies that “vegetable” is a different taxonomical option, when really it’s just a word for objects with a particular collection of traits that are relevant in a different context. What we should he saying is “While tomatoes are not fruit in the food pyramid, taxonomically, they are.” Doesn’t really roll off the tongue, though. Maybe “Tomatoes are vegetables AND fruits!” would solve that?

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Similarly, “a planet” can be understood in technical or colloquial context which changes the meaning. It can have a specific meaning or a vague flexible meaning, just like with berries.

      BTW raspberries are my favorite berries… sort of. Watermelons are pretty good too.

  • 0ops@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve met people who were certain that bugs weren’t animals

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      like everything else in this thread, doesn’t it depend on the context? like I’m willing to bet that if you polled a ton of people to “draw an animal” the overwhelming majority would draw vertebrates

  • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    …this would trigger a friend of mine so badly (fungi enthusiast and Pluto stan). I want to send it, but at the same time… I’m not sure I’d hear the end of it.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Send it and report back. I am interested in subscribing to their newsletter. you’ll let them know, right?