cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/138601

“That son of a bitch, Bibi Netanyahu, he’s a bad guy,” said Biden privately, according to Woodward. “He’s a bad fucking guy!”

Reads like a bloody Onion article.

  • Crikeste@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What speaks louder?

    Actions or words?

    Fuck Joe Biden and fuck Amerikkka. ✊🏼

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    “But we’ll still give him whatever he wants. That AIPAC there frightens me”

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can we stop reporting on Biden or whoever else using salty language unless it’s something along the lines of “I’m cutting off the fucking military aid.”?

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    A “bad guy!” My word, Mr. President, what next, we’ll stop sending them money? Have some decorum.

    • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      More lies to make the rubes think he is against the genocide. He has done this many times before and its always utterly meaningless.

    • Soup@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s so simple, even a random person on the internet with no knowledge of how any of it actually works has figured it all out!

      Yeah! Just… break a decades-long agreement. There no nuance to this at all! No complications…

      amirite?

      There can’t possibly be any penalties or repercussions for that! I mean. A random internet citizen said to do it- so……

      Easy peezy!

        • Soup@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          What do you think happens when America stops supplying Israel? Think they’ll just stop attacking Palestine?? They’ve already said that don’t really need America chipping in. And they don’t.

          So… when America just- stops sending them arms, the next bidder steps in. That’s what happens.

          And that’s going to be either China or Russia. And they wont have any restrictions like America does. (And before you say “what restrictions” I’d urge you to try and understand what’s involved in the pact). Russia and or China will absolutely allow them to decimate Palestine. And even help if necessary.

          And if America doesn’t end up going to war with them over this, guess, who they’re all most likely turning their sights on once Palestine becomes a gravel pit?

          This is just ONE example. There are MANY others. Pay attention when the experts on the sublet discuss this. You’ll learn something just as I did.

          And lastly…. What could be done, at best, is America might be able to leverage additional conditions. And if you’ve been paying attention- they’ve been trying to do just that this entire time.

          Again- nuance. Understand it.

          • bishbosh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            So… when America just- stops sending them arms, the next bidder steps in. That’s what happens. And that’s going to be either China or Russia.

            lol, holy shit

            • Soup@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Man… I’m really done wasting my time trying to explain simple concepts to far leftists. What a fucking waste of time.

              • bishbosh@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                You really think China and Russia would give billions of free weapons to Israel?

                • Soup@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I really think they’d go to someone, and negotiates would ensue. I can’t predict the outcome because I’m not an idiot that makes assumptions.

                  And again, I am not the one making these decisions. I’m simply offering an example of how it would be incredibly difficult to just simply- stop.

                  Which is more than anyone that’s countering the argument.

                  “It’s so easy! Just stop sending weapons! Break a trade agreement! No consequences at all because Israel is so well know as a nice and understanding nation!”

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re right, they should keep supporting acts of genocide because doing anything else is just too darn hard.

        Very well said!

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        So we throw away the “rules based international order” and return to the pre-1914 unilateral rules and all the brutal wars that bought? So much better, amirite? Might makes right, and we’ve got the might for now!

        The US stance on Israeli leadership is decimating our ability to wield soft power influence. We are global hypocrites blocking ANY action, whilst expecting the world to fall in line to support Ukraine against Russian revanchism - even NATO members dissent from the US position. The global south is turning to China/OPEC+ trading blocs. They already tried to break the petrodollar, which would be a huge blow if successful.

        Even taking a realpolitik approach, without soft power all those US military bases used for ‘power projection’ lose their local consent, and become occupation sites inside non-allied nations. the Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan is a chill spot for launching COIN drone missions - whereas the Conoco base in Syria is constantly under drone and rocket attack.

        Supporting Bibi’s wars of aggression is a stupid play on multiple levels.

        • Soup@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I never said it was good to support it (though I’m sure that won’t stop people from reporting me for being a genocide apologist). Only that it’s a very complicated and nuanced thing to just assume it should be easy to simply stop because we want it to.

          Nothing would make me happier than to see the issue resolved and for people to stop being hurt. But that’s not for me to decide. With a vote or otherwise.

          And that’s because it’s a very complicated agreement. Nations don’t just decide to break them. Regardless of your strong opinions on the matter.

          • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Maybe stop sending them billions in weapons then, eh?

            I see at least three actions in that statement:

            1. Stop giving them billions in free weapons
            2. Stop giving them any weapons
            3. Stop them

            #1 should have happened a long time ago imo, if not used as a leverage to prevent an Israeli ground invasion of Rafah, the West Bank, Lebanon, striking enrichment at Natanz. “Free bombs for crimes against humanity” is a bad moral play, bad politics, and bad diplomacy outside the US:Israel sphere.

            #2 Is politically hard normally, impossible in an election cycle. I hate it, but here we are in the house we built. Make FEC the only campaign funds - it’s OUR government, not the highest bidder’s.

            #3 The US’s geopolitical track record shows that we’ll tolerate some awful, terrible people if they’ll get ‘on our side’ even if there’s a trend of massive and foreseeable blowback, the diplomatic corps don’t learn lessons.

            • Soup@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              And my point is:

              1. It’s more complicated than that
              2. It’s more complicated than that
              3. it’s more complicated than that.

              What I’m trying to say is that none of us are experts on the subject. And those that are suggest that, guess what?

              Yeah. It’s more complicated than that.

              And I chose to believe the experts on the matter. But when they’re ready to argue music theory, I’ll eat their lunch. 😀

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It is.

        It was easy enough for Reagan, Bush Sr, Bush Jr, and Obama.

        It is easy enough to do again.

        Seriously, do you have no idea about recent history?

    • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      In an election year? That’s political suicide in the US to Harris by proxy, given how many people are brainwashed over there.

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They didn’t stop to think: what if people don’t want to vote for genocide? Oh well, we won’t give them that option because genocide is an American value. See: native Americans.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sometimes I wonder if Blinken dreams he could back to the times of the Wild West just so that he could shoot Indians and their food supply from the top of his high train.

          • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Haha, yeah Blinken. After Blinken played guitar in some bar a few months ago and some reddit threads were overflowing with astroturfed comments saying he should be the next American president, I wanted to vomit. But clearly, the monied interests are planning to run Blinken for pres in the future. Thats the future of the mighty Democratic party. To do that successfully they will need to keep the American right on a crazy train so Blinken is palatable. Its going to be a messed up next 20 years.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The majority of Americans are opposed to sending weapons to Israel. Even the majority of Republicans.

        Supporting Israel for political gain is a vastly overstated argument. It exists to justify sending weapons to Israel.

        It is very similar to the previous claim that Biden should not have been replaced because he was the incumbent.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The majority doesn’t matter because of gerrymandering and the electoral college. AFAIK the majority of Republicans are not opposed to it. A simple majority that might exist does not matter if the other absolute majority of the other options is bigger. You are also acting as if it wouldn’t be politicized and propagandized if suddenly one group started coming out against Israel, which would significantly affect polling from independents and break away republicans. Politics are a reactive environment, not a static one.

          Support for Israel has been very high historically in the US. It is only recently where it has declined significantly, and not really enough to make it not be the elephant in the room. And I can assure you, any relation you see between this issue and Biden not being replaced is PEBKAC, that involves a host of very different issues that you are only simplifying down to be similar in your head. For one, the change from Biden didn’t result in another foreign state, specially one that has experience and weight with influencing US and western institutions, trying to influence US elections, rather, it dismantled the efforts from the foreign state already involved in election manipulation that were singularly focused on Biden, forcing them into disarray.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Biden just waking up… He must be one of the only users who only reads reddit’s worldnews and nothing else.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I saw Biden give a press conference about the hurricane, and as he was walking out the door one of the reporters asked about his communication with Netanyahu, and he said over his shoulder “We didn’t talk about the hurricane.”

    • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And than he sent them billions in bombs?

      It saves reporters time to just paste that info about more bomb shipoments to Israel into the “signature” part of the newsstory word processor and have the computer just tack it on at the end of every single story. Increasingly these news stories can write themselves. What a time to be alive.

  • Yewb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So an interesting thing about the Israeli military, they empower all levels of the command chain to make decisions to complete the mission.

    It leads to this interesting situations where top leader can claim complete ignorance and the mission was completed.

    Look up the big brain little brain stuff.

    • MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s standard in Western militaries. It means units aren’t paralyzed by unexpected circumstances while they wait for communication to go up and down the chain of command, and it improves resilience if communications or senior officers are incapacitated.

  • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The israelis cooperate with Bidens fake “leaks” as well, and pretend to be “upset”. As long as the arms keep flowing and the American youth and left is held down-- thats all that matters. While I loathe Trump, captured by Russia and murderous corruption, I also loathe Biden, a lifelong racist misogynist liar bought and paid for by the zionists. Both are also idiots putting on a pretty transparent show. The fact that many americans eat it up and accept it as normal doesnt speak well of us as a people. The western order is truly dead and buried.