• Landless2029@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If social media becomes decentralized we might even gain traction reversing some of the brainwashing on the masses. The current giants are just propaganda machines. Always have been, but it’s now blatant and obvious. They don’t even care to hide it.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 hour ago

      check out “the gentleman’s guide to forum sliding”….

      as long as teams of people sit in a row of computers using dozens of sock puppets, no place is safe once it gets kinda popular….

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    In the same way that email has been decentralized from the get go, social media could have been equally decentralized, and I don’t mean in the older php forums, but in a different way that would allow people to reconnect with others and maintain contacts.

    • Vladkar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m currently reading The Expanse, and at one point a character mentions checking in on the family aggregator his cousin set up to help everyone keep track of who’s living where.

      Dude spun up a private Lemmy instance for his family. The future is now!

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    There’s another alternative, which is no social media at all. There is no particular problem that it solved. If it disappeared, would your quality of life be worse in any way?

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Forums and communities like these were very important for me growing up in the rural US South

      • perestroika@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Same here. Forums (about science fiction, aeromodelism, electric vehicles) have been important to me, and continue to be important in some fields.

    • trailnotfound@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Sounds great, but completely unrealistic. People have almost universally embraced social media because we’re social animals. How would it disappear, short of an outright global ban?

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I’m actually going to suggest; Yes, possibly. But for a very specific reason.

      While much of social media isn’t ultra necessary, federated social media could be quite essential to collectivising and resisting state and corporate manipulation and propaganda. All other forms of media and news are corporate or state controlled, and thus can construct and project false narritives that are beneficial to their aims, much to our collective detriment.

      Social media has become the dominant way that many, possibly most people, see the news, discuss such news with eachother from people around the globe, and build a picture of what’s going on outside of their isolated part of the world. I think Noam Chomsky in Manufacturing Consent gives a pretty fantastic argument on the importance of citizen controlled media, and federated social media is about as citizen controlled as it can possibly get. It’s non-corporate self-hosted open source software as far as the eye can see! It’s not perfect, but holy shit this is as powerful as a tool to diseminate ideas and information on a grassroots level that we’ve ever had, and we should not underestimate its usefulness in the coming decade.

    • dbkblk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      There’s Peertube as an alternative. It lacks some content, but the platform is on par. It is developed by a French association called Framasoft. Thus said, you’re right, Youtube is still okay, even thus there are some fake videos and scam, but they are easy to avoid.

      • Acoustic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Peertube sucks ass, so much content simply not even there, most videos don’t work or they’re in either mostly french or russian, and this is on the biggest instances.

        Now I might be stupid, but I really don’t see how peertube is an alternative. Odysee or rumble are my personal best bets, but in case of youtube it’s hard to find a real alternative in my opinion. Especially as a creator.

        • Green Wizard@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          “This centralized website sucks, let’s fix it with the same thing!” Last time I used Odysee it was full of tinfoil hat flat earthers. Rumble is youtube for people that got banned from youtube, and Odysee is youtube with the block chain pointlessly added to it. If either site ever hits youtube’s size they’ll just become the same issue youtube is, enshitification is bound to happen. I know having options is better than a monopoly, and Peertube admittedly is rough, but I think as it’s decentralized and self hosted it is the better option.

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Rumble is youtube for people that got banned from youtube

            I thought that was BitChute? Or is Rumble BitChute but not banned from all posts on Reddit (Reddit did a global block of all BitChute links as part of the attempt to black hole the video of the Christchurch shooting and the video the shooter’s manifesto suggests was what pushed him over the edge into action).

        • dbkblk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I agree. I don’t use it for these reasons. But technologically speaking, it’s an open source alternative.

  • baatliwala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I haven’t read the full article due to sign up paywall, but…

    First, millions of small business owners and influencers who make a living on TikTok were left to beg their followers in TikTok’s last moments to follow them elsewhere in hopes of being able to continue their businesses on other corporate social media platforms. This had the effect of fracturing and destroying people’s audiences overnight, with one act of government.

    How is decentralised social media going to help with this if the entire point of decentralisation is the opposite?

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      On decentralized media (Mastodon at the very least), you can move your account and your subscribers to any other instance whenever you want. You move with your audience, and they’ll barely notice any change, using the same app to keep following the same person automatically.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Luckily, there’s normally little cost to switching Lemmy instances anyway. You can even probably take the same username and register on another instance, quickly rebuild your feed and that’s mostly it.

          As everything is connected and there’s not much reason accumulating account age/karma/you name it, the loss is pretty minor.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I just wish we had a bit more political balance here… I’m not talking about fascists, but more people that don’t blame everything on capitalism would be kind of nice…

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Perhaps it is balanced you just want it to be more in line with your views?

      I have never met anybody who said “yes, this community is perfectly balanced.” Everyone always thinks it needs to get more in line with their beliefs and values

    • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      There are a few misconceptions in your comment:

      While I do agree that there are other problems like racism and bigotry which existed before capitalism (based on an answer you gave in another comment) and while I do agree these also need to be addressed, I do disagree that capitalism isn’t a major source of problems of modernity.

      Why?

      Because the cornerstone of capitalism is to use money to generate more money in a feedback loop towards (nonexistent) “infinite money” (which is different from feudalism, roman empire or ancient Egypt which all had some sort of market without being capitalist economies).

      SInce it is impossible to make infinity money, an inherent part of capitalism are the crises cycles of boom and bust.

      It also makes the creation of services as an afterthought (because making money is more important) and it is also tied to the enshitfication we’re seeing today.

       

      I think you’re calling as “capitalism” a thing that is actually “technological innovation (under capitalism)”

      We’re all aware of free/open source softwares

      We’re all aware that it is possible to develop technological innovation outside of capitalist framework (and again: Capitalism = Using money to make more (infinite) money)

      almost all of scientific researches advances are because of passion of the researches instead of the greed of capitalism.

      Yes… Everyone “needs” money to survive. But I hope you do agree that nobody in the world needs billions of dollars to simply survive.

      for God’s sake, a lot of people living in “third world” dream of earning 300 dollars a month to survive and consider that making 1000 dollars a month is a small luxury (I’m from brasil and 1000 dollars is around R$ 4000 or R$ 5000 while most people lives with R$3000 or less)

      What I’m saying is that, past the required money for surviving and for having a few “luxuries”, there is no need for anyone having millions or billions of dollars every month and that it would be possible to keep scientific and technological grow under such conditions because curiosity and desire for changes are part of human nature.

      if it was entirely impossible for humans to develop things without being paid before, then nothing around open/free software would exist.

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      For real. I once had the misfortune to admit to having some Centrist ideas, and the down votes were immediate and generous. No discussion, just personal attacks.

      And we wonder how things got to where they are.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      If nearly everything currently wrong with the country weren’t due to capitalism run amok I could sympathize. But unfortunately it’s not the 1960s anymore.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Okay, buddy. It’s all capitalism. Good luck with your pamphlets! I actually like the idea of making Western nations question capitalism… This said, no. It’s not “nearly everything” wrong with the world.

        Wake up, my friend. It’s 2025. Just because people in power are getting worse, doesn’t mean we can’t strive to be better.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Just because people in power are getting worse, doesn’t mean we can’t strive to be better.

          Yep, let’s rake our forests and rinse our recycling to handle climate change!

          If your house burns to the ground, no worries, you can just collect floatsom from the beach and build a new one!

          Dude, some things cannot be solved via positive vibes and being a good neighbor, and if you want my honest opinion on it, I think pushing everyday people to be accountable for everything while the broligarchs are accountable for nothing is a big part of the problem.

          In other words, you should strive to be better than an apologist for the system.

        • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Wake up, my friend. It’s 2025. Just because people in power are getting worse, doesn’t mean we can’t strive to be better.

          Except the entire capitalist system works against us striving to be better. It’s not like the American health care system sucks because the people in power suck. It sucks because to fix it you’d have to take capitalism out of the health care system because capitalism drives the profit motive within the health care system which makes it suck.

          Same with transitioning from oil to renewables. Fucking Exxon knew half a century ago that climate change is a thing and will lead to catastrophic results. They were in prime position to shift from oil to renewables and reinvent the global energy system, but it was more profitable to run disinformation campaigns and actively work against the transition so they did that instead. Even now some of the oil CEO-s are like “we’re already so fucked there’s no reason to go for renewables so let us keep making that money”.

          Same is now going on with electric vehicles. It’s much more profitable to sell ICE cars and fight the change instead of actually changing. I don’t remember if it was Mercedes or WV or some other manufacturer, anyway one of the big german car CEOs pretty much went “we can’t change to electric vehicles in time for the regulations. But you shouldn’t punish us with fines because we’re too big to fail.”

          The list goes on. The reason people here are so anti-capitalist is because most of us see that even if we want to strive to be better we can’t because capitalism keeps dragging us down. It’s like that scene in “Don’t look up” where the world comes together to save itself and just as the crisis is about to be averted the capitalist tech bro fucks it all up because who cares if we’re risking our entire planet, there’s money to be made. Capitalism will try its best to undermine any effort that prevents maximizing profits.

          Do you really think we’ll get to the 15 hour work week in 2030, like Keynes predicted? Definitely not under the capitalist system. We have empirical evidence that 32 hour work week improves productivity and we can’t even get that because the capital owners refuse to accept it. Literally something that could easily improve all our lives and we can’t get it done because of capitalism.

          Nobody is against striving to be better but wanting to get rid of capitalism is striving to be better because capitalism is like a steel ball attached to your ankle. It’s just weighing down all your efforts to be better.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Most civilized countries know that there is more than one way to implement capitalism, and the current US way is a catastrophic shit show.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Human nature? Greed? Racism? Biggotry?

        There’s an upsetting number of topics… And now I’m depressed. Because life is depressing when you think about it too much, isn’t it?

        • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          It sure is. It’s important to touch grass on a daily basis to stay sane. I personally go outside take a stroll and caress some leaves.

          Regarding your initial point : I see “capitalism” as the family of systems that enable that kind of IT monopoly. Sure, human traits such as greed and bigotry are probably the source of evil but it seems to me they have to be tapped, and enabled. The fact that the conversation often ultimately turns back to capitalism is legitimate imho.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yes, it is. But it’s not the only problem… In fact, there are a thousand other problems I wish we could all discuss with at least half the fervor as this topic.

        But no. This is the topic.

        • Balthazar@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I’m sorry bud, but that’s how the rumour mill worked since humans could talk. The message your trying to bring is good, don’t get me wrong. You are trying to currently change human nature somewhat.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Not trying to get into a whole ugly thing, just curious what your pro-capitalism stance is. Because I would definitely fall into this big Lemmy category of seeing 90-905% of modern problems being rooted in capitalism. So I would (civilly!) disagree, no doubt. Doesn’t mean we can’t have a reasonable discussion!

      • gerryflap@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I don’t have much time and energy for long discussions, but I just wanna share my feelings.

        I feel like people here see capitalism as a very black and white thing. Either it’s there and corrupting everything or it’s gone and everything is awesome. Personally I don’t think that’s the case. In my opinion there are some cases where the market can solve things more efficiently than a government institution, granted that this market is regulated and controlled by the government. I’m against unbounded capitalism like we see way too often nowadays.

        But here in western Europe, while certainly not perfect, the situation is way better than in the US. The government controls companies, gives them a slap on the wrist if they get too greedy. And while it still poisons a lot that it touches, the competitive aspect of it also makes sure that many inefficiencies are cut. In my opinion even we are not regulating it enough, and I do consider myself left-wing. But completely abolishing capitalism doesn’t make sense to me either.

        I think some things are better left to the government, stuff like healthcare, public transport, utilities like water or maybe even energy. Other things are better left private (but regulated): restaurants, barbers, supermarkets, most product development like phones, cameras, cars, computers, etc. There’s a huge grey area there that I don’t really have an opinion on.

        But I don’t see how a society without capitalism can provide stuff like decent smartphones, game consoles, restaurants, festivals, etc. These more “luxury” goods rely on competition to innovate and provide decent experiences, and here capitalism works better in my view.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        LOL. I’m not pro-capitalism, but thank you for proving my point.

        I actually think, as one example, the US’s healthcare system should 100% be socialized.

        • TheFriar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Proving your point…about what? I was just curious to hear someone’s thoughts who went against the idea that most modern problems can be traced back to the roots of capitalism. But fuck me, right?

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Public provision of services is not socialism, it’s just common sense. The first mass state pension system was rolled out by that crusty reactionary Bismarck. Every rightwing country still has fire departments and (mostly) public road systems too. Not doing it that way is just stupidity, not ideology.

          What is socialism is when people doing the work have control of the means of production. Control, not a token share. One example is cooperatives. By this definition (which goes back to Karl Marx), neither the USSR nor Communist China were socialist, they were totalitarian state capitalist entitites. China still is, though less incompetent than under Mao. And this isn’t some revisionist point of view. Rosa Luxemburg and other contemporaries saw it happening at the onset.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I don’t understand this sentence. The two words I don’t know in this context are “gore” and “matrix”

  • porsche13@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Decentralized money as well. We need to move away from the control of government and corporations (they are now one and the same). I’m putting more and more of my money in bitcoin. The dollar will continue to erode while wages stay flat. And Trump and his new oligarch buddies will completely decimate the American economy and stock market while they make out like bandits, leaving everyone else the bag holder. Your 401k isn’t safe anymore.

    • cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Trust me bro, if your underground stash of money is robbed or stolen because you refuse to trust a bank to safeguard it, it will be considered your fault

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Same but with Monero. I don’t need my friends, neighbors, $5 wrench attackers, and governments knowing how much money I have. And neither should you.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yes, but it does not work well. You constantly get failing payments due to inadequate channel liquidity unless you’re using a large centralized wallet provider and using a large centralized wallet provider defeats the purpose of peer to peer digital cash that’s uncensorable.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Unfortunately, Lemmy demonstrates pretty clearly that decentralized systems are just as vulnerable to propaganda and brain rot.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      At least we can easily pack up and move camp in familiar territory (same apps/frontends, etc.)

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Really? Just as? There are rogue groups and certainly rogue mods and individuals with axes to grind, but I’ve never dealt that there was anything on a system wide basis or anything that was driven by profit here. There’s some really wild hive-mind attitudes here too but, I don’t see how it could possibly be as attractive as centralized platforms for manipulation, profit, or thought control. Feel free to shine some light on my naivety if there’s something I’m missing here.

    • ShadowWalker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      So long as it is humans posting this will be a problem. The benefit of a federated system is that you can’t compromise the person at the top and then everything collapses.

      I just jumped on here today (from seeing this article on Reddit) but my understanding is that the advantage is that the CEO can’t decide he wants to suck authoritarian cock and destroy our ability to discuss and/or organize.

      (Admittedly I joined the biggest server I could find so I kind of violated that idea as well).

    • UNY0N@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      That’s the nature of the beast. You can’t have human users on a network without at least some slop.

      But the decentralized network ensures that a “techno-baron” has no more say than you or I, which is exactly what the internet is supposed to do.

      That’s decidedly better than a centralized system, especially now.