• Spiderwort@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Maybe all digital content just shouldn’t be trusted. It’s like some kind of demon-realm or something. Navigable by the wise but for common fools like you and I, perilous. Full of illusion.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      interesting counterpoint. but i also imagine if ai content was correctly tagged, traffic to slop content would dramatically decrease, reducing incentive to post the content in the first place.

      i don’t know which force is stronger but i think both certainly exist.

    • NudeNewt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      This. Don’t let AI or AI posters know that you caught on. Just report them and be on your way.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Slop is insulting. If I take the time to read it, I want another human to have taken the time to write it.

    • reev@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The counter there is to have an AI summarize it. No time taken to write nor to read haha

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I foresee a future where we have an AI layer on top of corporate emails, translating from English to corpo-speak and back to English again.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        That would work if it didn’t get even that wrong a huge amount of time. There are entire subreddits dedicated to AI summary fails!

  • Lurker@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It is available on R34, Hentai and Porn Website.

    Truly we are just improving our tech to goon. LOL

    • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Tech progress has always been driven by humanity’s desire to either kill or fuck someone. I, for one, prefer horny-based progress. Make love, not war, and all that.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Personally, I don’t really care.

    I do enjoy some types of AI content, I do not enjoy others. Same as any other type of content. So that tag would be useless for my personal preferences.

    Anyway nsfw tag is made not for moral reasons, but to avoid those images showing when you are in an environment that’s not proper for them (basically so it doesn’t look like you are watching porn at work), this makes no sense for AI content, So I don’t see the point besides some kind of persecution driven by a particular ideology. So I don’t support it.

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Definitely, just to prevent it from being normalized. Just like crypto, flying cars, psychics, MLM businesses, this shit will fade in to the into the domain of low skill grifters.

  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I am in complete agreement with this. While you can currently tell what’s AI it won’t be long before we’re scratching our heads wondering which way is up and which way is down. Hell, I saw an AI generated video of a cat cooking food. It looked real sortve.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    And people want a NSFL tag and people want a…

    You get a tag, and you get a tag, and you all get a tag!

      • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        so if I use an AI engine to do in-painting on an existing image, then that’s fine? This image is AI enhanced:

        Would it need to be tagged? (obviously should be tagged NSFL)

        • ewigkaiwelo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          All of your points are valid, it is hard to draw definitive line, but so will be hard moderating the content because there will be people not giving correct tags to their posts, so even if there will be specific labels for “A.I. generated”, “modified using A.I.” etc people still will avoid using them, intentionally or not

  • Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    That might work for now when those of us who know what to look for can readily identify AI content for the time being, but there will be a time when nobody can tell anymore. How will we enforce the tagging then? Bad actors will always lie anyway. Some will accidentally post it without knowing its AI.

    I think they should add a tag for it anyway so those who are knowingly posting AI stuff can tag it but I fear that in the next few years the AI images and videos will be inescapable and impossible to identify reliably even for people who are usually good at picking out altered or fake images and videos.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    political posts should have a tag as well, so people can filter them out. people just bluesky, pixelfed, … instead of lemmy because of all the politics here.

    • Samsy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, we need to stop all the politics in here!

      Strokes his penguin over the head