• BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I use chromium for one thing, and it’s casting live sports to my Chromecast. My plans to implement a HTPC have just been expedited.

      • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Discord, slack, bitwarden, steam, Microsoft teams, visual studio code, balena etcher . Anyone else know of any electron apps or heavily modified version of chrome?😄

        • qupada@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Teams has switched to Microsoft’s own edition of the same concept, “Edge WebView2”. Now that Edge is just being Chrome wearing a rubber Scooby Doo mask, I don’t expect the differences are vast.

          Another fun iteration is Plex’s desktop client, which uses QtWebEngine… however surprise! still the Chromium engine underneath.

          Signal’s desktop app is plain old Electron though.

          Of the ones on your list, worth noting that Discord and Slack work fine with FirefoxPWA.

            • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I use the shit out of Firefox PWA. I just wish Mozilla would get off their asses and make it work out of the box vs having to install a third party app.

          • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I do wish there were more native apps but alternatives to electron is always a good thing in my book.

            Except for Microsoft, Microsoft can stop pretending their solution is demonstrably different from electron and chromium.

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Unfortunately for work I may have no choice:-(. Several of our daily work products I’ve tried on Firefox without success. Those also don’t have ads.

      I wish there were better alternatives. I may try out LibreWolf but I could not imagine it somehow being easier, though with enough effort put in the end result may be all that matters. Until the first update (possibly forced on the server end even if I don’t on mine) that breaks everything and I cannot do my work for the day, in which case I will absolutely go crawling back to Chrome, bc they have us by the short hairs there.:-(

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        My company just plain old won’t install Firefox without a good reason.

        I’m stuck using chrome or edge. Once the ad block stops working on chrome, I move over.

        • _pete_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I really hate the corporate IT.

          I was at a job that was slowly transitioning from a medium sized company to a larger one, initially we were allowed just install and use whatever on our machines, but gradually IT started implementing policies where if we wanted to add something it had to go through a request system and usually it would be denied.

          As a software developer this was just infuriating, it would hold up work, force us to use shitty software (like Chrome and Edge) and there would often be fuck ups where installing a new version of software would require removal of the old one and installation of a new one - which would trigger the approval process again.

          Like - I get it - some people can’t be trusted, but we were some of the key devs for the companies product, we know what we’re doing.

          I was rather happy to leave that part of the company behind when I left.

        • Matth78@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          On my work computer I don’t have admin rights but still I could install Firefox with no problems. It installed itself for local user only.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          My company just plain old won’t install Firefox without a good reason.

          If you have other potential employers in mind, the IT environment at your current employer and other potential employers is maybe one factor to keep in mind in making decisions as to where to work.

          There are some IT policies that are no-gos for me at potential employers. I ask during the interview process.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      What pisses me off is how many websites don’t work right with Firefox now. There’s been several times where I’ve had issues with a site functioning on Firefox and had to switch to a chromium browser.

      • danafest@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I was recently trying to add tickets from ticketbastard to Google wallet to be able to use them offline. I have chrome disabled on my phone. Surprise surprise it doesn’t work with any other browser except chrome. The ticketbastard app just throws an error and nothing happens. Took me a lot of searching to realize it was because chrome was disabled.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I read that most sites work just fine if you spoof your user agent to windows and standard chrome

        • ayaya@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          This breaks any site that uses CloudFlare’s Turnstile for me. It will loop forever and never let me through if my user agent is set to Chrome.

        • calamityjanitor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The only problem I run into is sites that use Bluetooth or USB APIs to talk to a local device. Both Firefox and Safari don’t implement them due to security concerns.

      • drspod@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I see this FUD all the time but nobody ever gives examples. Can you point to some specific sites that don’t work with Firefox?

        • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s not FUD but there’s usually more to it than just “Firefox”. Usually has something to do with security plugins. There are sites that do not work properly with Ublock or Noscript installed, even when you turn them off for the site. I’ve experienced it many, many times. It happens to me most often ordering food, because a lot of local restaurants sites are janky as fuck, but I’ve also had issues with more well known sites. Southwest airlines has been problematic for a couple years now. My credit union also had issues with parts of their online banking app, but that thankfully got fixed after a year or two.

          TL;DR - it’s a real thing.

        • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The payment provider my local council uses doesn’t work on Firefox, or Safari. I have to use shitty chrome on my phone. I refuse to install it on my computer.

        • kill_dash_nine@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I was worried about this when I originally switched from Chrome to Firefox earlier this year but I can honestly say I haven’t found a single site that I personally use that I had to go back to Chrome for. Any issues I had with any site were related to ad blocking using uBlock or DNS based blocking I also do.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          dialog boxes will just fuck off. I’ve never gotten webRTC to work properly, though that might be configuration skill issues, and or webRTC implementation skill issues, since it seems to only work on browser, not across two different ones.

          I’ve seen sites just load asinine layouts, borked kerning, completely fucked text handling. Just goofy shit.

          In some cases i’ve seen sites have no download buttons on firefox. I don’t know why, it’s confused me a few times though.

        • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The local Uber eats clone here has the submit order button off screen. Reuters on Android sometimes has the top bar of the webpage shift down over the content. A video conferencing site used by my medical provider won’t connect the video. The 3rd party comment section on our local news site sometimes lays out the controls off screen. The Lemmy PWA on Android used to crash on startup (recently fixed yay!!)

          FF is my daily driver and 99% of things work fine, but I’ve definitely found a few sites where they clearly didn’t test it. I still have Chrome installed for those rare occasions I need it.

          And I don’t even necessarily blame Firefox for this. I used to do web dev back in the day and I remember making my shit work across multiple browsers. Maybe Firefox is doing it right and Chrome is doing it wrong, but everybody targeted Chrome because it has a zillion percent of the market.

      • Caesium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I have a friend who sends me tiktoks that refuse to load with firefox on my phone. I consider it a blessing

      • SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I only have Chrome installed for the rare occasion where a site doesn’t work in Firefox. I feel like we’ve gone a bit backwards as of lately in building websites that are browser agnostic.

      • mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Does this happen in you work environment or on your private managed system? I raise this question because I started to realize that governing firefox apparently is a hard task. Never did I experience a faulty site on my private desktop devices but on my work stations. Im currently running firefox 115.13.0esr.

  • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah, we saw this coming. When Manifest v3 first talked about.

    Google an ad company are killing ab blockers. Yeah, that sounds right.

    • Shatpoz1288@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The more people use Firefox, the more web devs will be forced to ensure their website works on Firefox.

    • Enekk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m showing my age, but back when IE was basically the only browser and Firefox (Firebird back then) launched, people often lamented that things didn’t work in Firefox. The solution? People used Firefox and web developers were forced to make their shit work in Firefox. When Chrome came out, suddenly we had three real options and the way to make everything work? Open Standards.

      Now, Chrome is in the position IE was back before Firefox came around. How ever will we make sure things work in Firefox??? Use Firefox. If enough people dump Google’s malware browser, the web has to go back to supporting multiple browsers through open standards.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Have you reported issues for them? It’s in the menu somewhere. If Mozilla get a lot of reports for particular sites, they reach out to the webmaster and try to work with them to improve Firefox support - usually by removing proprietary Chrome-only features or by removing reliance on Chrome bugs that don’t exist in Firefox.

      You can also report the issue at https://webcompat.com/, just search to see if it’s already been reported first.

    • Akareth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Same. For me, the big one’s my bank that requires its users to use Chrome, else it won’t let you log in. I got around this by using an agent-switcher extension in Firefox.

  • Angel Mountain@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Let this be my warning to Google that I will never go back to their browser when they do. Challas! ✌️

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah I’m using Fennec, which doesn’t have that. But as long as it’s a flick of a switch to disable, I don’t really mind. Still a million times better than manifest v3.

      • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you use a DNS solutions you can block all the telemetry shit. Frankly FF has been phoning home in a lot of undesirable ways for many years even before this, like most browsers.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re overreacting. Firefox knows their users. I am a huge “stan” for Firefox, but I will delete it like a time traveller if they make it impossible to ignore ads. I will salt the earth and poop on Firefox’s grave and actively avoid it everywhere… However. If I’m wrong, there will be a Next Thing…

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m grateful for FF, but they also annoy me at times. Just little stuff probably not worth bitching about in detail. But also a peek at the potential for problems that you’re talking about.

        So of course I’ll bitch about it.

        I call it the “stop whatever you think you’d rather do right now and pay attention to our product” type shit.

        Imagine you have a combination wrench and whenever you take it out of the toolbox it starts yammering at you about how great of a wrench it is and all if its shiny features. Fucking ridiculous, right?

        So why do we tolerate software that does that?

        Way too much software does this pushy shit. Just stay outta my face and do your actual job, software.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          We’re so fucking used to ads we don’t even always realize we’re getting pushed propaganda

        • Blaster M@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Because people have the attention span of a goldfish and if you aren’t reminding them every 5 seconds of the features they have available they’ll forget they do in fact use them and then complain to support because they can’t spend 5 seconds on the help page.

          I say this, not in defense of mozilla, but in frustration at having to deal daily with these kinds of issues. You can put giant screen-size arrows on where to go / what single “do the thing” button to press and people will still forget 5 seconds later.

          • Boozilla@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Good point. That’s true, there is definitely that side of it. I think what you’re talking about is less obnoxious than the stuff that feels forced and make-the-boss-happy promotional. Push notifcations for no reason, etc. It’s a spectrum from necessary to uneccessary, and there’s too much of the latter IMO.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Firefox is a foundation, not a corporation. And I’m already using Fennec instead of the official release.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, it’s strange just how readily the blinders go up wherever Mozilla is concerned. They’re a corp, just like any other; if they had the money and leverage, they’d be just as aggressive as Google. Have people already forgotten that time they laid off 200+ employees and then gave all the execs bonuses?

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Anyone else been having issues of not being able to load YouTube videos past the first few seconds on Firefox using ublock? I couldn’t find any recent information online. I don’t know if this is part of the war on ad blockers, or unrelated.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s been a side effect of the server side ads apparently, but reloading the page fixes it for me.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I watched several videos today on Firefox with ublock origin and no issues. Haven’t run into issues with ads yet.

      • errorlab@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, yesterday. I just kept refreshing. FF + unlock + not signed in, seems to trigger it

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    What im scared if of publishers taking this as a reason to simply start banning Firefox and other browsers.

    • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      An ecom site decides to block 5% of web traffic and potential sales?

      Now tell the marketing team you are turning away 1 in 20 potential customers because (well, not really sure why) and see what they have to say.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It takes more than changing your user agent to msk which browser you use. It’s trivial to know which browser you’re really using if they really want.

      • Fashim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah I’ve got an extension for it, it just changes the user-agent string.

        I use it on YouTube because for some totally not suspicious reason Firefox won’t play videos but when I spoof it to Chrome everything works fine.

        • TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’ve noticed significant YouTube quality degradation when using Firefox, but no issues with Chrome.

          Got a link for the extension by any chance?

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          User-agent is being deprecated, so it won’t work forever.

          Also note that if people keep their UA as Chrome permanently, hit counters will count them as Chrome users, and the number of Firefox users will go down.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              The comment I replied to was mentioning user-agent. User-agent is being deprecated (replaced by client hints) so changing the user agent will eventually stop working.

              At the moment, the stats for browser usage rely on user agent as recorded by stats software used by various sites, so if you make Firefox pretend to be Chrome, you’ll be contributing to the Firefox user percentage going down.

              • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Right but why is that relevant? What good or bad does a number going down do? If Firefox wanted to keep track they could just count the number of downloads right?

                • dan@upvote.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  The issue is that sites will have even less reason to support Firefox if the number of people using Firefox goes down.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Not always doable as they could be relying on non-standard features that are only in Chrome.

        Not exactly the same thing, but my employer requires us to use Chrome for all internal stuff, as they’re using Chrome Enterprise Premium as part of their endpoint security solution, and of of course that only works in Chrome.

    • Jarmer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s already plenty of business web apps that require chrome. I specifically use a business focused web app that not only requires Chrome, but ONLY CHROME ITSELF and no chromium derivatives. That’s the first time I’ve come across that. I had previously seen chrome requirements, but they worked just fine on ungoogled chromium. Not this one, nope. Regular Google Chrome and nothing else. wtf is that garbage.

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You can get past these with a user agent, lying about which browser it is. However, they aren’t testing for other browsers, so their site maybe as buggy as hell. As yet Firefox doesn’t do a WINE and match Chrome, bug for bug, so sites work as intended. Google have cause IE6’s return.

        • Jarmer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It was indeed buggy, which was when I reached out to support. They immediately asked if I was using not Google Chrome itself, but a Chromium offshoot like Brave or Vivaldi. I was using ungoogled chromium, so they told me it won’t work. I switched to regular google chrome and it worked great. I wonder what on earth they’re using that’s part of Google Chrome that makes it work and not part of any other chromium projects.

  • jay@mbin.zerojay.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The one and only thing keeping me on Chrome… well, Ungoogled Chromium… is the webassembly performance which is just abysmal in comparison on Firefox, sadly.

    • LostXOR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Almost as if a browser company that’s not also an advertising company has no reason to fight ad blockers.

        • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          i mean they bought a privacy preserving ad company to offer an alternative for companies to google, which is what they should be doing.

          because like it or not people depend on ada for their sites.

        • endofline@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          You can always fork firefox. People used to use website not requiring javascript at all and it worked well. Some people still use even w3m f.e. when graphics card driver goes bad after update and they need to watch some docs on the internet. Most current browser have most features you would ever need

          • hollyberries@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Forking is indeed the way forward when Mozilla loses its way a little more. For myself, I switched to Librewolf about 6 months ago, along with replacing Thunderbird with Betterbird after using it since the Phoenix days.

            I cannot remember what prompted the move to Librewolf, it may have been the AI stuff they were pushing at the time, or possibly the update that forced the tabs into my titlebar without having to go into about:config to fix it. Or the fact that Firefox was constantly pushing me to sign up for an account. There were quite a few gripes that added up over time lol

            Betterbird restored some removed things I liked pre-supernova as well as a native systray icon under Linux and that was enough motivation to make the switch.

            It is time for a new browser to enter the market. Either Ladybird or something built with Servo seems likely.

      • jo3shmoo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Same. Firefox Mobile had been a laggy mess when I used it a few years ago, but a combination of some really aggressive advertising and the announcement of manifest v3 caused me to give it another shot about a year ago. It’s a dramatic improvement in phone browsing.

  • irish_link@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Glad I have firefox as well but also looking forward to a cool new project called Ladybird. https://ladybird.org

    Not sure if its the right one but glad there are more projects out there trying to jump into the game. (I know extensions are a long way off for it but i see it as hope.)

    Also please consider running pihole or adguard home. Or any other full home DNS add blocker. It will help.

    • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Looks like what I’d want to use, but to reach broad support it needs a Windows client as well.

    • Jarmer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ladybird looks great! Very much looking forward to an alpha linux release so I can use it and give all kind of feedback.